Static posturographic balance in neurotologic patients may be associated with middle-high-frequency hearing levels during ageing process

BACKGROUND

Understanding how sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) impacts postural balance in patients is important, as postural balance predicts the risk of falls.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

We aimed to clarify the relationship between characteristics in the configuration of audiograms and static postural balance as measured by posturography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 385 outpatients (mean [± standard deviation] age, 58.4 ± 18.4 years) with SNHL by audiometry and posturography. Data were analysed by multiple regression models with the outcome of postural sway area with eyes closed (PSA) and predictive variables of audiometric data, adjusted for sex, age and the presence of nystagmus.

RESULTS

The increased hearing threshold in the better hearing ear was associated with poorer or higher PSA (beta coefficient [β] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03-0.75, per 10-dB increment). No difference in PSA was detected between patients with asymmetric or symmetric SNHL. None of the frequent diagnoses (presbyacusis, Meniere's disease, and idiopathic sudden SNHL) were associated with poorer PSA. Hearing thresholds at middle (β = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.10-0.67) and high frequencies (β = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.07-0.55) were associated with poorer PSA, whereas those at low frequencies was not.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Postural balance in neurotologic patients may be associated with middle-high-frequency hearing levels during ageing.

High bone mineral density in lifelong trained female team handball players and young elite football players

PURPOSE

Low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures are a major concern in the female population and preventative strategies are needed. Whether team sports participation may reduce age-related bone loss in elderly women is still uncertain.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty healthy, non-smoking women participated in this cross-sectional study, i.e., elderly (60-80 years) team handball players (EH, n = 35), elderly untrained controls (EC, n = 35), young (18-30 years) elite football players (YF, n = 30) and young untrained controls (YC, n = 30). A whole-body and two regional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed to evaluate BMD and a blood sample was collected for measurement of bone turnover markers (BTMs).

RESULTS

EH had higher BMD in all regions of the lumbar spine, except for L1, compared to EC (8-10%), and higher BMD in the femoral Ward's triangle (9%) and trochanter (7%) of the left leg. Furthermore, EH had higher mean leg BMD (8%) and whole-body BMD (5%) than EC. EH and YC had similar BMD in femoral trochanter, L1-L4 and mean leg despite an age difference of ~ 40 years. YF had higher BMD in all regions of the proximal femur (18-29%) and lumbar spine (12-16%) compared to YC, as well as higher mean leg BMD (20%) and whole-body BMD (13%). Sclerostin was 14% lower in EH compared to EC. YF showed higher PINP (98%), osteocalcin (57%), and CTX (83%) compared to YC.

CONCLUSION

Lifelong team handball training and elite football training are associated with superior bone mineralization and changed bone turnover in elderly and young women.

Short-term comparison of postural effects of three minimally invasive hip approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty: Direct anterior, posterolateral and Röttinger

INTRODUCTION

There is renewed interest in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the development of minimally invasive approaches. The anterior and Röttinger approaches are attractive for their anatomical and minimally invasive character, but with no comparative studies in the literature definitely suggesting superiority in terms of quality of functional recovery. We therefore performed a case-control study, assessing: 1) whether the postural parameters of patients operated on with the anterior, Röttinger and posterior minimally invasive approaches were similar to those of asymptomatic subjects, and 2) whether there were any differences in postural parameters between the three approaches at short-term follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the anterior and Röttinger approaches are less disruptive of postural parameters than the posterior approach.

METHODS

Seventy subjects (44 primary THA patients and 26 asymptomatic control subjects) were enrolled. Operated subjects were divided into 3 experimental groups corresponding to the 3 minimally invasive approaches: posterior (n=14), anterior (n=15) and Röttinger (n=15). Two single-leg stance tests (left followed by right leg stance; 10s per test) were carried out on a stabilometric platform, within 2months after surgery for all THA patients, and for controls. Six significant parameters were selected for statistical analysis: test performance, mediolateral and anteroposterior displacements of the center of pressure (CP), path length, average CP displacement speed, and the ellipse containing 95% of CP projections. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the 3 study groups and the control group according to age, gender, BMI, or side (or between study groups regarding WOMAC score). No significant differences between approaches were found for success on postural tests (P=0.14). Subjects operated on with the anterior or Röttinger approach showed significant differences from asymptomatic subjects for 2 postural parameters: path length (Röttinger P=0.04, anterior P=0.03) and average CP displacement speed (Röttinger P=0.04, anterior P=0.03). Subjects operated on through the posterior approach showed no significant differences from asymptomatic subjects.

DISCUSSION

The study hypothesis, that the anterior and Röttinger approaches for hip arthroplasty are less disruptive of postural parameters than the posterior approach, was not confirmed. The anterior and Röttinger approach groups showed higher average CP displacement speed and path length, suggesting that they use up more energy resources to maintain static balance. The posterior approach had the least impact on postural parameters in the first 2 postoperative months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

The influence of time of day on static and dynamic postural control in normal adults

[Purpose] We attempted to determine whether static and dynamic postural control ability fluctuated depending on the influence of the time of day (9 am, 1 pm, and 5 pm), and at which time point postural balance performance was best in healthy individuals. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-four healthy subjects participated in this study. The static and dynamic postural balance test was conducted during three sessions (i.e., at 9 am, 1 pm, and 5 pm) with a counterbalanced order for prevention of learning effects. As outcome measurements, AP distance, ML distance, and velocity moment were adopted in the static balance test, and the performance time and total distance were measured in the dynamic balance test. [Results] For the static postural balance test, COP distance was shorter and COP velocity was slower at 9 am compared with those at 1 and 5 pm. In particular, the COP distance at 9 am was statistically different from that at 13 pm. During the dynamic postural balance test, performance time and total distance were influenced by the time of day, as the best performance was observed in the morning. [Conclusion] This study found that static and dynamic postural balance abilities were greatest in the morning and worst at 1 pm. Understanding of the mechanism of the time-of-day effect on postural balance will be helpful for assessment and treatment of postural balance by physical therapists and in making desirable clinical decisions.