Comparing a novel wide field of view laparoscope with conventional laparoscope while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

The limited 70° field of view (FoV) used in standard laparoscopy necessitates maneuvering the laparoscope to view the ports, follow the surgical tools, and search for a target region. Complications related to events that take place outside the FoV are underreported. Recently, a novel laparoscopic system (SurroundScope, 270Surgical) was reported to dramatically expand the FoV from 70 to 270°. This study focuses on differences in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the SurroundScope compared to the standard laparoscope.

METHODS

Forty-four laparoscopic surgeries were performed and video recorded. A subanalysis of 21 Cholecystectomies was performed and compared to 21 Cholecystectomies, performed with the standard laparoscope during the study period by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

No accidental or intraoperative adverse events occurred when using the SurroundScope. Subanalysis of 21 Cholecystectomies revealed shorter fog/smoke cleaning times using the SurroundScope compared to the standard scope (1.45 ± 5.08 sec vs. 54.95 ± 137.77 sec, p = 0.0454). Furthermore, operations performed with the SurroundScope had a shorter trocar placement duration (85.0 ± 40.9 sec vs. 111.3 ± 70.5 sec; p = 0.077), shorter time to achieve critical view of safety (9.5 ± 4.14 min vs. 15.8 ± 11.87 min; p = 0.015), and shorter procedure duration (31.9 ± 10.4 min vs. 42.9 ± 22 min; p = 0.025). In post-operative evaluations, the surgeon noted that tools could be continuously followed and ports were visible without camera manipulation. Also, the surgeon agreed that the procedure could be better planned due to the wide FoV and that surgical workflow was improved. Furthermore, the surgeon agreed that the procedure was safer using the SurroundScope.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial results demonstrate the advantages of the SurroundScope over standard laparoscopy. By expanding the FoV, visualization is improved, the procedure is more efficient, significantly shorter and most important, patient safety, per surgeons' testimonials is improved. Further investigation to quantify these benefits in a larger group of patients and among various surgical procedures should be considered.

Effects of wide-angle laparoscopy on surgical workflow in laparoscopic cholecystectomies

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy is now the gold standard approach to many surgical procedures thanks to its many advantages. Minimizing distractions is essential to a safe and successful surgery and an undisrupted surgical workflow. The SurroundScope, a wide angle (270°) laparoscopic camera system has the potential to decrease surgical distractions and increase workflow.

METHODS

Forty-two laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed by a single surgeon, 21 with the SurroundScope and 21 with standard angle laparoscope. Video recordings of surgeries were reviewed for calculating the number of entries of surgical tools into the field of view, relative time of tools and ports viewed in surgical field and number of times camera was removed due to fog or smoke.

RESULTS

The usage of the SurroundScope resulted in a significantly lower number of entries to the field of view compared to the standard scope (58.50 versus 102; P < 0.0001). Usage of SurroundScope resulted in a significantly higher appearance ratio of tools, with a value of 1.87 compared to 1.63 for standard scope (P-value < 0.0001), and the appearance ratio of ports was also significantly higher, measuring 1.84 compared to 0.27 for the standard scope (P-value < 0.0001). In addition, the SurroundScope had to be removed and reinserted due to smoke or fog in only 2 cases (9.5%), compared to 12 cases (57.1%) in the standard scope group (P-value < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The SurroundScope camera system improves surgical workflow in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This conceivably increase the safety of the operation due to the utilization of the wide-angle view and "chip on the tip" technology.

The introduction of wide-angle 270° laparoscopy through a novel laparoscopic camera system

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy has enjoyed improvements over the last three decades primarily in achieving high definition, but the 70° field of view (FOV) remains unchanged. Complications related to events that take place out of the FOV continue to be reported. Additional problems leading to poor visualization are fogging and smoke accumulation. A novel laparoscopic system (SurroundScope, 270Surgical) was developed and dramatically expands the FOV from the 70° to 270° by adding side cameras at the distal tip of the laparoscope, while LED illumination eliminates fogging and improves smoke effects. This study describes the initial clinical experience with SurroundScope and its potential advantages over traditional laparoscopy.

METHODS

SurroundScope was studied at Bnai Zion Medical Center in Israel and the Minnesota Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery in America. 27 laparoscopic surgeries were performed, and at the end of each procedure, evaluations were completed by all surgeons and camera holders.

RESULTS

All 27 cases were completed successfully without adverse events. No injuries occurred as a result of surgical tool manipulation outside of the central frame while 133 potentially adverse events were identified on side frames. There was no fogging across the 27 cases. The impact of smoke was negligible in all cases, as laparoscope removal or venting was never necessary. Surgeon respondents indicated that tools could be followed from the port to the site of surgery without camera manipulation. Most surgeons strongly agreed that the potential to identify bleeding was improved. Camera holders strongly agreed that the ergonomics were improved and that they moved the camera less than with a standard laparoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial results demonstrate numerous advantages for SurroundScope as compared to traditional laparoscopy. The important benefits of expanded FOV, complete lack of fogging, and negligible smoke may improve patient safety, reduce adverse events and the duration of surgery. Further investigation to quantify these benefits is recommended.