M1 Macrophage Derived Exosomes Aggravate Experimental Autoimmune Neuritis via Modulating Th1 Response

Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), an immune-mediated disorder affecting the peripheral nervous system, is the most common and severe acute paralytic neuropathy. GBS remains to be potentially life-threatening and disabling despite the increasing availability of current standard therapeutic regimens. Therefore, more targeted therapeutics are in urgent need. Macrophages have been implicated in both initiation and resolution of experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN), the animal model of GBS, but the exact mechanisms remain to be elucidated. It has been increasingly appreciated that exosomes, a type of extracellular vesicles (EVs), are of importance for functions of macrophages. Nevertheless, the roles of macrophage derived exosomes in EAN/GBS remain unclear. Here we determined the effects of macrophage derived exosomes on the development of EAN in Lewis rats. M1 macrophage derived exosomes (M1 exosomes) were found to aggravate EAN via boosting Th1 and Th17 response, while M2 macrophage derived exosomes (M2 exosomes) showed potentials to mitigate disease severity via a mechanism bypassing Th1 and Th17 response. Besides, both M1 and M2 exosomes increased germinal center reactions in EAN. Further in vitro studies confirmed that M1 exosomes could directly promote IFN-γ production in T cells and M2 exosomes were not capable of inhibiting IFN-γ expression. Thus, our data identify a previously undescribed means that M1 macrophages amplify Th1 response via exosomes and provide novel insights into the crosstalk between macrophages and T cells as well.

Expression of Th1/Th2 cell-related chemokine receptors on CD4+ lymphocytes under physiological conditions

INTRODUCTION

Chemokine receptors (CRs) and the prostaglandin D₂ receptor, CRTH2, have been used as surrogate markers for cytoplasmic Th1 and Th2 cytokines. The presence of regulatory T (Treg) and Th17 cells may affect the analysis of such surrogate markers, as they share several CRs with Th1 and Th2 cells. This study aimed to determine the optimal surrogate markers of Th1 and Th2 cells under physiological conditions.

METHODS

Surface and cytoplasmic markers of CD4⁺ peripheral lymphocytes were analyzed in healthy volunteers by flow cytometry. Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg cells were identified as IFN-γ⁺ , IL-4⁺ IL-13⁺ , IL-17⁺ , and CD25⁺ FoxP3⁺ CD4⁺ lymphocytes, respectively.

RESULTS

The percentages of CXCR3⁺ and CCR5⁺ CD4⁺ lymphocytes clearly correlated with those of Th1 cells. The percentage of CRTH2⁺ CD4⁺ lymphocytes showed the closest correlation with that of Th2 cells. The percentages of Th2 cells correlated with those of CCR3⁺ or CCR8⁺ CD4⁺ lymphocytes, with the majority of CCR3⁺ and CCR8⁺ cells unlikely to be Th2 cells, themselves. The proportions of CCR4⁺ or CCR7⁺ CD4⁺ lymphocytes did not correlate with those of Th2 cells, possibly due to their expression on the surface of Treg and Th17 cells. Th2-related receptors were classified into three different groups for better understanding.

CONCLUSION

CXCR3 and CCR5 are useful markers of Th1 cells. With the exception of CCR4 and CCR7 expressed at measurable levels on Treg and Th17 cells, CRTH2 and CRs, CCR3, and CCR8 may be employed as surrogate markers of Th2 cells. The proposed surrogate markers may help physicians in interpreting the disease state.