Pizones J, Martín-Buitrago MP, Sánchez Márquez JM, Fernández-Baíllo N, Baldan-Martin M, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ. Decision Making of Graduation in Patients With Early-Onset Scoliosis at the End of Distraction-Based Programs: Risks and Benefits of Definitive Fusion.
Spine Deform 2019;
6:308-313. [PMID:
29735142 DOI:
10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.005]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective comparative analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Study early-onset scoliosis (EOS) graduated patients to establish founded criteria for graduation decision making and determine the risks and benefits of definitive fusion.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
EOS is treated by growth-friendly techniques until skeletal maturity. Afterwards, patients can be "graduated," either by definitive fusion (posterior spinal fusion [PSF]) or by retaining the previous implants (Observation) with no additional surgery. Criteria for this decision making and the outcomes of definitive fusion are still underexplored.
METHODS
We analyzed a consecutive cohort of "graduated" patients after a distraction-based lengthening program. We gathered demographic, radiographic, and surgical data. The results of the two final treatment options were compared after 2 years' follow-up.
RESULTS
A total of 32 patients were included. Four patients had incomplete records. Thirteen underwent PSF, and 15 were observed. The mean age at initial treatment was 8 ± 3 years, with a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 2.9 years. Both groups had similar preoperative and final radiographic parameters (p > .05). The criteria for undergoing PSF were as follows: implant-related complications, main curve magnitude (PSF = 63.2° ± 9° vs. OBS = 47.9° ± 15°; p = .008), curve progression >10°, and sagittal misalignment (SVA). During PSF 12/13 patients underwent multiple osteotomies, one vertebrectomy, and 3 costoplasties. Surgical time was 291.5 ± 58 minutes; blood loss was 946 ± 375 mL; and the number of levels fused was 13.7. Coronal deformity was corrected 31%, T1-S1 length gained was 31 ± 19.6 mm and T1-T12 length gained was 9.3 ± 39 mm; kyphosis was reduced by 22%. However, coronal balance worsened by 2.3 ± 30.8 mm. No major complications were encountered in these patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Graduation by PSF depended on unacceptable or progressive major curve deformity, sagittal misalignment, or complications with previous implants. Observation depended on curve stabilization, Cobb <50°, and coronal misalignment <20 mm. Definitive fusion effectively corrected coronal and sagittal deformity and increased trunk height. However, it exposed patients to a very demanding surgery without improvement in coronal balance.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, therapeutic.
Collapse