1
|
Thaher O, Tallak W, Hukauf M, Stroh C. Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Patients with Super Obesity (Body Mass Index > 50 kg/m 2). Obes Surg 2022; 32:1546-1555. [PMID: 35175541 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-05965-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With increasing BMI, the complexity of treating patients with obesity rises. The focus of this study is to investigate the effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on perioperative morbidity and remission of comorbidities at 3 years in patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective multicenter analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to enroll patients with a 3-year follow-up after SG or RYGB between 2005 and 2019 and a BMI of > 50 kg/m2 preoperatively. Patients' BMI and comorbidity status were recorded preoperatively. RESULTS We analyzed data from 2939 patients who had at least a preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m2. A total of 1278 patients underwent RYGB surgery, and 1661 underwent SG. The distribution of sex, BMI, hypertension, reflux, and sleep apnea was significant between the two groups. Three years after surgery, the percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 62.21% in RYGB and 55.87% in SG (p < 0.001). The change in hypertension (p < 0.001) and reflux (p < 0.001) was significantly in favor of RYGB. The change in diabetes mellitus was not significant between the two groups (p > 5%). There was a minimal difference in sleep apnea in favor of SG (p < 0.001). Mortality and overall complication rates were not significant in either group. CONCLUSION Both procedures positively affected comorbidities, BMI, and %EWL in patients with super obesity 3 years after surgery. In some categories, RYGB was better than SG. Nevertheless, the decision between the two methods remains a matter of the surgeon's experience and the patient's general condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Thaher
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
| | - Wael Tallak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Municipal Hospital, Straße des Friedens 122, 07548, Gera, Germany
| | - Martin Hukauf
- StatConsult Society for Clinical and Health Services Research mbH, Am Fuchsberg 11, 39112, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christine Stroh
- Department of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, SRH Municipal Hospital, Straße des Friedens 122, 07548, Gera, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Konstantonis G, Singh KV, Sfikakis PP, Jamthikar AD, Kitas GD, Gupta SK, Saba L, Verrou K, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Laird JR, Johri AM, Kalra M, Protogerou A, Suri JS. Cardiovascular disease detection using machine learning and carotid/femoral arterial imaging frameworks in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:215-239. [PMID: 35013839 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05062-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The study proposes a novel machine learning (ML) paradigm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) detection in individuals at medium to high cardiovascular risk using data from a Greek cohort of 542 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, or diabetes mellitus, and/or arterial hypertension, using conventional or office-based, laboratory-based blood biomarkers and carotid/femoral ultrasound image-based phenotypes. Two kinds of data (CVD risk factors and presence of CVD-defined as stroke, or myocardial infarction, or coronary artery syndrome, or peripheral artery disease, or coronary heart disease) as ground truth, were collected at two-time points: (i) at visit 1 and (ii) at visit 2 after 3 years. The CVD risk factors were divided into three clusters (conventional or office-based, laboratory-based blood biomarkers, carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes) to study their effect on the ML classifiers. Three kinds of ML classifiers (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Linear Discriminant Analysis) were applied in a two-fold cross-validation framework using the data augmented by synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) strategy. The performance of the ML classifiers was recorded. In this cohort with overall 46 CVD risk factors (covariates) implemented in an online cardiovascular framework, that requires calculation time less than 1 s per patient, a mean accuracy and area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 98.40% and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) for CVD presence detection at visit 1, and 98.39% and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) at visit 2, respectively. The performance of the cardiovascular framework was significantly better than the classical CVD risk score. The ML paradigm proved to be powerful for CVD prediction in individuals at medium to high cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Konstantonis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Research Scientist, AtheroPoint™, USA, Roseville, CA, USA.,Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, M13, UK
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Gr. Noida, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Kleio Verrou
- Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Manudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|