Titanium Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Good to Excellent Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Metal Allergy Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The main purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with positive skin patch tests who underwent medial mobile-bearing titanium niobium nitride unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during a mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with positive skin patch tests were included in this prospective study. The clinical evaluation consisted of Oxford Knee Score and Knee Society Score (KSS) reports. Each patient was clinically evaluated the day before surgery (T₀) as well as at T₁ (11.9 ± 1.3 months) and during the final follow-up T₂ (67.2 ± 19.1 months). The positioning of the UKA was evaluated during the final follow-up using standardized radiographs (T₂: 67.2 ± 19.1 months).

RESULTS

Oxford and KSS ranged from a respective mean preoperative value of 23.0 ± 2.7 and 51.5 ± 5.0 to 42.1 ± 1.7 and 87.6 ± 2.2, respectively, at T₁ (P < .001) and to the final values of 45.0 ± 1.9 and 91.9 ± 3.4, respectively, at T₂ (P < .001 both vs T₁ and T₂). At T₂, the mean femoral angle was 7.0° ± 4.5°, mean tibial angle was 3.0° ± 2.1°, and mean tibial slope was 5.1° ± 3.2°. A significant difference was found between KSS and Oxford with ANOVA for repeated measures over time (P < .001). The Oxford and KSS scores showed significant improvements during each follow-up. No complications were found, and not a single patient required a revision surgery during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The hypoallergenic titanium niobium nitride mobile-bearing UKA showed comparable results to standard CoCr UKA regardless of the gender, age, BMI, and implant size of metal allergy patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Careful patient selection processes and accurate medical histories played key roles in the choice of hypersensitivity-friendly implants.

Ability of a wash regimen to remove biofilm from the exposed surface of materials used in osseointegrated implants

The skin/implant interface of osseointegrated (OI) implants is susceptible to infection, causing excess pain, increased morbidity, and possibly implant removal. Novel distal femoral OI implants with binary nitride coatings have been developed with little physiological modeling to collect microbiological evidence of resistance to bacterial attachment. This in vitro study evaluated a Ti-6Al-4V alloy coated with TiNbN and treated with low plasticity burnishing (LPB) to assess attachment and biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) under physiologically modeling conditions compared to standard Ti-6Al-4V alloy materials with a polished ("Color Buff") or non-polished finish ("Satin Finish"). Washability of the materials were also assessed and compared. It was hypothesized that the TiNbN/LPB treatments would resist bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation to a greater degree than the other two materials, and have a higher degree of bacterial removal following a clinically relevant wash regimen. Material types were exposed to a constant flow of broth containing MRSA and were analyzed using bacterial quantification, surface coverage analysis, and SEM imaging. Quantification data showed no difference in bacterial attachment among the varying material types both with and without the wash regimen. Surface coverage and SEM analysis confirmed results. The wash regimen led to an approximately 3 log₁₀ reduction in bacteria for all material types. Though the results did not support the hypothesis that a TiNbN coating/LPB treatment might resist bacterial attachment/biofilm formation more than other alloys, or have less bacteria after cleaning, results did support the potential importance of a daily wound-hygiene regimen at the skin/implant interface of OI materials. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.