[Factors influencing patient competency and health care of service members of the German armed forces with deployment-related mental illness: A patient interview study]

BACKGROUND

The number of service members of the German armed forces suffering from deployment-related mental health problems is steadily rising. Preliminary studies have shown that less than 50 % seek professional help. There is little knowledge about the factors influencing the development of an adequate level of patient competence to cope with the complexity of the clinical picture and the care of people with operational disabilities in the interprofessional network.

METHODS

The article presents data gathered by semi-structured, guided interviews from 14 affected individuals analyzing salient beliefs about the perceived factors influencing their patient competence and care through the interprofessional network of supporters inside and outside the German armed forces. Data evaluation was carried out by means of content-structuring, qualitative content analysis using the method of deductive-inductive category formation.

FINDINGS

Based on the interviews conducted, we identified four groups of salient beliefs having an influence on patient competence: identify changes and limitations, recognize illness, redirect one's life, help shape one's life again, and four groups of salient beliefs having an influence on care: intangible / material support, medical supplies, psychosocial support, third-party support. All main topics could be assigned to three levels of influence (individual, individual-contextual, contextual) and stored with a total of 70 topics (codes).

INTERPRETATION

The development of an effective "social structure" was named by those affected as an important influencing factor. Family members, comrades, superiors, and military GPs appear to have a significant impact on patient competence and care. The respondents' opinions about the importance of internal factors such as the soldier's self-image and fear of stigmatization are consistent with previous findings. Structural factors like supply procedures were mentioned as specific German armed forces phenomena.

Are migrants diagnosed with a trauma-related disorder at risk of premature mortality? A register-based cohort study in Denmark

Background

Mental illness is common among refugees displaced by conflict and war. While evidence points to the relatively good health in terms of longevity of migrants resettled in the destination country, less is known about the mortality of the most vulnerable migrants with a trauma-related diagnosis alone and those with an additional comorbid psychotic disorder. This study aimed to provide an overview of the number and mortality of foreign-born individuals diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder or Enduring Personality Change after a Catastrophic Event (PTSD/EPCACE), a psychotic disorder or both.

Methods

A nationwide register-based cohort study, including residents in Denmark, followed from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2016. The exposure was PTSD/EPCACE and psychotic disorders as well as region of origin. Relative all-cause mortality was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models and calculated for migrants with one or both groups of disorders compared to those from the same region without the disorder.

Results

During the study period, 6,580,000 individuals (50.4% women) were included in the cohort. Of these 1,249,654 (50.5% women) died during follow-up. For men and women from the former Yugoslavia, the Middle East and Northern Africa, a PTSD/EPCACE diagnosis alone or with comorbid psychotic disorder was not associated with increased mortality after adjusting for region of origin. A psychotic disorder alone, however, was associated with an increased mortality rate.

Conclusion

Despite the severity of many refugees' traumatic experiences, a diagnosis of a trauma-related psychiatric disorder did not appear to increase the mortality rates.

[Trauma Disorders - A Relevant Health Problem]

Trauma Disorders - A Relevant Health Problem Abstract. In medical practice traumatic stress disorders are underdiagnosed. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) must be considered in case of pronounced need for control, severe anxiety and restlessness, jumpiness, mental torpor, dissociative disorders, social withdrawal, distrust or vegetative over-arousal. Simple screening instruments such as the "Primary Care PTSD Screen" are suitable for an initial assessment. As long as symptoms are not serious and long-lasting and there are no risk factors for the development of severe PTSD, it is a matter of creating external and internal security, informing about possible support, acknowledging the suffering and establishing secure interpersonal relationships. In the case of a pronounced PTSD with considerable psychological strain, a referral for further psychiatric or psychotherapeutic clarification and treatment is appropriate.

Psychosocial care for seriously injured children and their families: a qualitative study among emergency department nurses and physicians

BACKGROUND

Approximately one in five children who sustain a serious injury develops persistent stress symptoms. Emergency Department nurses and physicians have a pivotal role in psychosocial care for seriously injured children. However, little is known about staff's views on this role.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate Emergency Department staff's views on psychosocial care for seriously injured children.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 nurses and physicians working in an Australian Paediatric Emergency Department. We used purposive sampling to obtain a variety of views. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and major themes were derived in line with the summative analysis method. We also mapped participants' strategies for child and family support on the eight principles of Psychological First Aid (PFA).

RESULTS

Five overarching themes emerged: (1) staff find psychosocial issues important but focus on physical care; (2) staff are aware of individual differences but have contrasting views on vulnerability; (3) parents have a central role; (4) staff use a variety of psychosocial strategies to support children, based on instinct and experience but not training; and (5) staff have individually different wishes regarding staff- and self-care. Staff elaborated most on strategies related to the PFA elements 'contact and engagement', 'stabilization', 'connection with social supports' and least on 'informing about coping'.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong notion of individual differences in views suggests a need for training in psychosocial care for injured children and their families. In addition, further research on paediatric traumatic stress and psychosocial care in the ED will help to overcome the current paucity of the literature. Finally, a system of peer support may accommodate wishes regarding staff care.