Accuracy of 3D printing compared with milling - A multi-center analysis of try-in dentures

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) has been used to produce removable complete dentures. Most workflows include fabrication of milled or 3D-printed try-in prostheses. 3D-printing accuracy is affected by laboratory-specific and operator-dependent factors. This international five-center study sought to compare the accuracy of 3D-printed and milled try-in dentures.

METHODS

The construction file of a maxillary removable complete denture was selected as a reference. Eight try-in dentures were 3D printed at each of the five centers. Each center used their own printer (Objet260 Connex, Stratasys; MAX, Asiga; Anycubic Photon, Anycubic 3D; PRO2, Asiga and cara Print 4.0, Kulzer) along with their own material, printing settings, post-processing and light-curing parameters. At center 2, eight try-in dentures were milled to serve as a benchmark (PrograMill PM7, Ivoclar Vivadent). Dentures were scanned and aligned to the reference file using best-fit algorithms. Geometric accuracy was analyzed using the root mean square value (trueness) and standard deviation (precision) of the distributed absolute mesh deviations. Mean values of the five sets of printed dentures and the single set of milled dentures were compared.

RESULTS

Milled dentures showed a mean trueness of 65 ± 6 μm and a mean precision of 48 ± 5 μm. Thus, they were significantly more accurate than the 3D-printed dentures in four out of five centers. In mean absolute numbers, 3D printing was less true than milling by 17-89 μm and less precise by 8-66 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although milling remains the benchmark technique for accuracy, differences between milled and 3D-printed dentures were non-significant for one printing center. Furthermore, the overall performance of 3D printing at all centers was within a clinically acceptable range for try-in prostheses.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The accuracy of 3D printing varies widely between and within laboratories but nonetheless lies within the range of accuracy of conventional manufacturing methods.

A Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Value from Radiograph with Interocclusal Records made During Jaw Relation and Try-in: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of programming the articulator using the radiographs and the interocclusal records made during Jaw relation (Arrow point tracing) and Try-in stage. The study comprised of 15 edentulous subjects with well formed maxillary and mandibular ridges, with no signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders and neuromuscular disorders. Digital Orthopantomograph was taken for all the subjects. The condylar guidance angles were traced on Orthopantomograph for right and left sides and the values were recorded. The protrusive interocclusal records were made at jaw relation stage and at try-in stage using bite registration paste (Bitrex- vinyl polysiloxane) for all subjects. These interocclusal records were used to programme the Semi-adjustable articulator (Hanau Wide Vue) and the condylar guidance values on the right and left sides were recorded. The condylar guidance values so obtained were compared with the values obtained by Orthopantomograph. The condylar guidance values obtained by the various procedures were subjected to statistical analysis. The results showed statistically significant difference between the condylar guidance values obtained from Orthopantomograph (Radiograph) and the condylar guidance values obtained at the stage of jaw relation and also between Orthopantomograph and condylar guidance values obtained at the stage of Try-in. Condylar guidance values obtained from the Radiographs were higher than those obtained at the stage of Jaw relation and at the stage of Try-in. However, we notice that the mean condylar guidance values obtained at the stage of Try-in were nearer to the mean condylar guidance values obtained on the Radiographs.