Tumor BRCA testing in ovarian cancer and EQA scheme: our experience of a critical evaluation

Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a widespread molecular biology method integrated into clinical practice to detect genetic variants, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The scheduled external quality assessments (EQA) is integral part of clinical molecular laboratory quality assurance. The EQA provides an efficient system to compare analytic test performances among different laboratories, which is essential to evaluate consistency of molecular test. EQA failures demands targeted corrective action plans. In this context, the complexity of the NGS techniques requires careful and continuous quality control procedures. We report a tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing benchmark discrepancy provided by the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network in our laboratory during a round of EQA for somatic mutation testing of BRCA genes in relation to ovarian cancer. The critical analysis emerging from the tBRCA EQA is presented. We underline that harmonization processes are still required for the EQA in the molecular biology field, especially if applied to the evaluation of methods characterized by high complexity.

Tumor BRCA testing can reveal a high tumor mutational burden related to POLE pathogenic variants

•

Some gynecologic tumors harbor a POLE pathogenic variant, raising prognostic and therapeutic issues.

•

Tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant exhibit multiple BRCA1/2 variants, reflecting the high tumor mutational burden.

•

Tumor BRCA testing could be a way to detect tumors harboring a highly mutagenic POLE pathogenic variant.

Objective

Tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, associated with high tumor mutational burden, are good candidates for immunotherapy. However, POLE pathogenic variants are not currently screened in routine clinical practice. Can these tumors be identified by means of an already available test?

Methods

We describe seven tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, among eight patients with tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants (from 4 to 20). All patients were managed at Institut Curie, Paris. Five patients were selected because of unexpected tumor BRCA testing results with multiple variants and another three patients were selected because of a POLE pathogenic variant detected by large tumor testing. We looked for other tumor variants by Next-Generation Sequencing in tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants, and for multiple BRCA1/2 variants in tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant.

Results

Four of the five tumors selected because of multiple BRCA1/2 variants exhibited a POLE pathogenic variant, and all three tumors selected for POLE pathogenic variants exhibited multiple BRCA1/2 variants.

Conclusions

Tumor BRCA testing could be a way to detect tumors harboring a highly mutagenic POLE pathogenic variant.

The BRCA1 c.788G > T (NM_007294.4) variant in a high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patient: foods for thought

In this report we described the case of a BRCA1/2 (BRCA) molecular testing performed on tumor sample in a High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (HGSOC) patient with two different Next Generation Tumor Sequencing (NGTS) pipelines. The two clinical reports leaded to apparently different BRCA status, providing important foods for thought. After NGTS, the gene sequencing information (i.e., reads) are aligned to the reference gene sequences obtained from public databases, in order to provide an uniform nomenclature for unambiguous variant designation. However, the criteria adopted for variant reporting in tissue test are not always univocal. Particularly, this is the case of rare and unclassified BRCA variants for which the molecular evaluation may be a relevant challenge. Here we described a BRCA1 unclassified variant that may be re-evaluated in the context of alternative BRCA1 transcripts due to its different biological effect. We underlined that an in-depth knowledge of BRCA testing is mandatory for its appropriate use.

BRCA testing delay during the COVID-19 pandemic: How to act?

Recently, our lab, part of a referral center in Italy, reported its experience regarding the execution of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) testing during the first months of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which highlights a substantial reduction (about 60%) compared with the first 2 months of the current year. This evidence appeared to be a lockdown effect due to extraordinary restriction measures to slow down the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the overall effects of the ongoing pandemic on gBRCA testing in our institution and to understand how COVID-19 has influenced testing after the complete lockdown (March 8-May 5, 2020). Additionally, we compared this year's trend with trends of the last 3 years to better monitor gBRCA testing progress. This detailed analysis highlights two important findings: (1) gBRCA testing did not increase significantly after the lockdown period (May-October 2020) compared with the lockdown period (March-April 2020), emphasizing that even after the lockdown period testing remained low. (2) Comparing the total tests per year (January-October 2017, 2018, 2019, with 2020), the impact of COVID-19 on gBRCA testing is apparent, with similarities of trends registered in 2017. These evidences reveal a gBRCA testing delay for cancer patients and healthy patients at this moment, and the new era of gBRCA testing in the management of ovarian, breast, pancreas and prostate cancer patients has been seriously questioned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As consequence, we underline that measures to guarantee oncogenetic testing (e.g., gBRCA testing) along with new diagnostic/clinic strategies are mandatory. For these reasons, several proposals are presented in this study.