Contemporary management of incompetence of the small saphenous vein in the light of the recent results of the FOVELASS study

The FOVELASS study, a randomised multicentre trial published this year by the French Society of Phlebology, confirms the technical superiority of endovenous laser over sclerosing foam in the treatment of small saphenous vein incompetence, over a 3-year follow-up. However, this study also validates the good clinical results of foam, equivalent to those of endovenous laser, already observed in other clinical studies on the great saphenous vein. Thermal ablation has therefore consolidated its leading position in the treatment of saphenous veins but depending on the anatomical configuration of the veins and the economic context, sclerosing foam, which is widely applicable, highly versatile, and cost-effective, may be an interesting alternative.

Factors that influence venous leg ulcer healing and recurrence rate after endovenous radiofrequency ablation of incompetent saphenous vein

OBJECTIVE

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the most popular techniques for correcting superficial vein reflux. However, the effectiveness of RFA of superficial vein reflux in patients with active or healed venous leg ulcer (VLU) is unknown. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to evaluate the healing rate, the recurrence rate, and the factors significantly associated with healing and recurrence in patients with active or healed VLU who had superficial venous reflux treated with RFA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all healed VLU or active VLU patients treated with RFA at the Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, during January 2011 to December 2017 to evaluate the rate of VLU healing and recurrence. Time to healing and time to ulcer recurrence were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Risk factors were assessed to determine their association with VLU healing and recurrence by Cox regression survival analysis.

RESULTS

RFA of the great saphenous vein (n = 56), anterior accessory saphenous vein (n = 5), or both (n = 1) was performed on 62 limbs with active (n = 32) or healed (n = 30) VLUs. The mean age of patients was 65.4 ± 9.8 years, and 80% were female. Deep venous insufficiency was present in 10 limbs (16%). Pathologic perforating vein was found in 17 patients (27%). Concomitant ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) of the pathologic perforating vein was performed in 12 limbs (19%). Concomitant phlebectomy was performed in 19 limbs (31%). The median follow-up time was 753 days after RFA. VLU healed in 31% of patients at 3 months, in 56% at 6 months, and in 66% at 1 year after RFA. Concomitant UGFS of the pathologic perforating vein was the only factor significantly associated with VLU healing (hazard ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-7.55; P = .037). VLU recurrence was found in 8% of patients at 1 year, in 14% at 2 years, and in 23% at 3 years after RFA. Deep vein reflux was the only identified risk factor for VLU recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-13.21; P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

UGFS of the pathologic perforating vein at the time of RFA of saphenous vein reflux improved VLU healing. VLU recurrence was more frequent in patients with concomitant deep vein reflux. The authors suggest performing UGFS of the pathologic perforating vein at the time of RFA to improve VLU healing and monitoring of patients with associated deep vein reflux for ulcer recurrence.

[Treatment of lower limb varicose veins in 2015: The present and the future]

The introduction of intravenous therapy (ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, laser, radiofrequency) has considerably changed radical treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. The recent granting of reimbursable status for radio frequency thermal ablation has led us to propose radical synthetic treatment for varicose veins. The treatment is based on Doppler ultrasound exploration with detailed varicose cartography, taking into account the affected area (large or small saphenous vein), the site of the point or points of leakage, the diameter of the incontinent saphenous vein, whether the saphenous vein and tributaries are rectilinear or sinuous, and the depth of the varicose network in relation to the skin surface. The decision to implement radical therapy is based on the stage of the disease, particularly in the event of trophic lesions, and takes into consideration both the functional and aesthetic impairment caused by the varicose disorder. All of the foregoing factors affect the choice of treatment, which is also based upon the availability of the various technical approaches mentioned, upon full control of the benefits and limitations of each of the various methods, and upon informed patient consent with regard to the various options proposed: surgery, essentially involving stripping and phlebectomy or endovenous treatments: chemical ablation via ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, and laser or radiofrequency thermal ablation.