[Voiding dysfunction after TVT: A 20-year experience TVT-placement under local anesthesia and sedation]

BACKGROUND

Trans-vaginal tape has become the gold standard for the cure of urinary stress incontinence, but post-operative voiding dysfunction is frequently reported. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of voiding dysfunction, dysuria, chronic urinary retention, and necessity of reoperation after retropubic TVT placement under local anaesthesia and sedation.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We perform a retrospective study of a cohort of patient treated with the placement of a retropubic TVT under local anaesthesia and sedation between 1999 and 2019 for a SUI. Post-operative voiding dysfunction and necessity of reoperation were reviewed to access the principal aim of this study.

RESULTS

Three hundred and two patients who met the eligibility criteria were included in the study. At 3 months, the dysuria rate and chronic urinary retention rate was 4.3% and 1%. At 12 months it was 2.6% and 0.3% respectively. The 12-month sling section rate was 1% and long-term self-catherization rate was 0.3%. The objective cure rate was 93% and subjective cure was 92%.

CONCLUSION

TVT placement under local anaesthesia and sedation resulted in few voiding dysfunctions at medium/long-term, necessity of re-operation for refractory obstructive disorder and well functional results. Even if these results support more frequent use of this type of anaesthesia, it would be interesting to be able to follow them in a prospective study to conclude.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Use of the Urethral Sling to Treat Symptoms of Climacturia in Men After Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Climacturia affects up to 45% of men after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although urethral slings decrease the severity and frequency of stress incontinence after RP, their efficacy as a treatment for climacturia after RP has not been well studied.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported changes in climacturia symptoms after implantation of a urethral sling as a treatment for stress incontinence after RP.

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review identified males aged 18-80 years who received urethral slings for stress incontinence after RP at our institution from 2012 to 2017. These patients were mailed an 11-item questionnaire asking them about climacturia symptoms before and after implantation of a urethral sling. Written informed consent was obtained from patients participating in the mailed questionnaire.

OUTCOMES

Respondents were asked to report on climacturia frequency and severity, bother, partner bother, and incontinence before and after implantation of urethral slings.

RESULTS

A total of 42 questionnaires were mailed; 17 were available for analysis. The median age (and interquartile range, IQR) of the sample at RP was 64 (59.5, 68.0). Almost all (94.1%) of the men were sexually active at the time of the study and 64.7% reported experiencing urinary leakage during sexual arousal. Most (58.8%) underwent the urethral sling procedure to treat general incontinence; 35.3% underwent the procedure to treat both general incontinence and incontinence during sexual activity and 1 (5.9%) underwent it for other reasons. A median of 28.1 months elapsed between RP and sling procedure (IQR: 18.36, 53.88; minimum: 8.00; maximum: 108.36). Statistically significant shifts toward improvement from presling to postsling were noted for frequency of leakage during sexual arousal or orgasm (P = .041) and for the degree to which leakage of urine during sexual arousal or orgasm was a "bother" (P = .027). While almost all (94%) of the men were incontinent before sling, this percentage dropped to 53% after sling (P = .031).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Urethral slings should be discussed as a treatment strategy for climacturia during clinical consultations with patients.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Strengths include consistent surgical technique. Limitations include retrospective design, lack of a nonsling comparison group, subjective nature of outcome measures, possible response bias, and variability in time interval between RP and sling procedure.

CONCLUSION

Use of urethral slings after RP is associated with improvements in climacturia symptoms, bother, and incontinence. Nolan J, Kershen R, Staff I, et al. Use of the Urethral Sling to Treat Symptoms of Climacturia in Men After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2020;17:1203-1206.

Long-term functional outcome and complications of male suburethral slings in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence: A prospective five-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

Suburethral male slings are an alternative option for mild stress urinary incontinence. Our purpose is to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes, efficacy and worsening continence of male suburethral slings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The functional outcomes of realignment/anatomical slings were evaluated with AdVance ®, and the outcomes of compressive slings were evaluated with InVance®. We considered 55 patients fulfilling 5 years of complete follow-up. We included patients with a 24-hour pad weight test <400 grams. Night-continent patients who also had positive "repositioning tests" were considered for AdVance®, whereas patients without sphincter contraction or previous pelvic radiotherapy were considered for InVance®.

RESULTS

Between February 2006 and September 2010, 24 AdVance® and 31 InVance® slings were implanted. The median follow-up times from sling insertion were 75 months in the AdVance® group (range: 64-97) and 86 months in the InVance® group (range: 61-108). At three months of follow-up, 43 of 55 patients were considered to be cured (pad-free) (78.1%), 79.1% in the AdVance® group and 77.4% in the InVance® group. Postoperatively, 16.6% of patients with AdVance® and 22.5% of patients with InVance® presented "de novo" urgency. At 5 years of follow-up, we observed 10 cases of some deterioration of continence, 3 patients in the AdVance® group and 7 in the InVance® group (15.8% and 29.1% of the initially cured, respectively). To date, there have been no reports of urethral sling erosion.

CONCLUSIONS

Male slings are safe and effective. Although we observed an increase in "de novo" urgency, in our experience, slings seemed to maintain their efficacy during long-term follow-up, and the risks of urethral erosion are low.