Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Reduces when Training Demand Variability Increases

One component of vestibular rehabilitation in patients with vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) hypofunction is gaze-stabilizing exercises that seek to increase (adapt) the VOR response. These prescribed home-based exercises are performed by the patient and thus their use/training is inherently variable. We sought to determine whether this variability affected VOR adaptation in ten healthy controls (× 2 training only) and ten patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (× 1 and × 2 training). During × 1 training, patients actively (self-generated, predictable) move their head sinusoidally while viewing a stationary fixation target; for × 2 training, they moved their outstretched hand anti-phase with their head rotation while attempting to view a handheld target. We defined the latter as manual × 2 training because the subject manually controls the target. In this study, head rotation frequency during training incrementally increased 0.5-2 Hz over 20 min. Active and passive (imposed, unpredictable) sinusoidal (1.3-Hz rotations) and head impulse VOR gains were measured before and after training. We show that for controls, manual × 2 training resulted in significant sinusoidal and impulse VOR adaptation of ~ 6 % and ~ 3 %, respectively, though this was ~two-thirds lower than increases after computer-controlled × 2 training (non-variable) reported in a prior study. In contrast, for patients, there was an increase in impulse but not sinusoidal VOR response after a single session of manual × 2 training. Patients had more than double the variability in VOR demand during manual × 2 training compared to controls, which could explain why adaptation was not significant in patients. Our data suggest that the clinical × 1 gaze-stabilizing exercise is a weak stimulus for VOR adaptation.

The instantaneous training demand drives vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) maintains stable vision during rapid head rotations by rotating the eyes in the opposite direction to the head. The latency between onset of the head rotation and onset of the eye rotation is 5-8 ms in healthy humans. However, VOR latency can be 3-4 times larger in patients treated with intra-tympanic gentamicin. A prior study showed that latency can be trained with head rotations at 0.2 Hz. We sought to determine how the VOR is affected when a delay between vestibular and visual stimuli is added during adaptation training with high-frequency head rotations (impulses), where the VOR is the main vision-stabilizing system. Using a variant of the incremental VOR adaptation technique, the delay between head rotation onset and movement onset of a visual target was gradually increased. With this training, the instantaneous VOR gain demand (= target/head velocity) varied from less than unity to greater than unity during each head impulse, albeit in a consistent and repeatable way. We measured the active and passive VOR gain and latency before and after VOR adaptation training in healthy normal subjects. There was no significant change in VOR latency across subjects; however, there was a significant decrease in VOR gain of - 6.0 ± 4.5%. These data suggest that during high-frequency head rotations delay/latency is interpreted as a changing instantaneous VOR gain demand. Although the gain demand in this study had a complex trajectory, adaptation was evident with the VOR seeming to use an average of the instantaneous gain demand.

Retinal Image Slip Must Pass the Threshold for Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation

We sought to determine whether repeated vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation training to increase the VOR gain (eye/head velocity) had a lasting effect in normal subjects and whether there was a retinal image slip tolerance threshold for VOR adaptation. We used the unilateral incremental VOR adaptation technique and horizontal active (self-generated, predictable) head impulses as the vestibular stimulus. Both active and passive (imposed, unpredictable) head impulse VOR gains were measured before and after unilateral incremental VOR adaptation training. The adapting side was pseudo-randomized for left or right. We tested ten normal subjects over one block (10 sessions over 12 days) of VOR adaptation training and testing, immediately followed by a second block (5 sessions over 19 days) of testing only without training. Our findings show robust short-term VOR adaptation of ~ 10 % immediately after each 15-min training session, but that the daily pre-adaptation gain was most different on days 1 and 2, and for subsequent training days before saturating to ~ 5 % greater than the pre-adaptation gain on day 1. This increase was partially retained for 19 days after regular training stopped. The data suggest that stable vision in normal subjects is maintained when there is < 5 % deviation in VOR gain from the original baseline, which corresponds to < 9°/s retinal image slip. Below this threshold, there is poor adaptive drive to return the gain to its original baseline value.

Human vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation is frequency selective

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the only system that maintains stable vision during rapid head rotations. The VOR gain (eye/head velocity) can be trained to increase using a vestibular-visual mismatch stimulus. We sought to determine whether low-frequency (sinusoidal) head rotation during training leads to changes in the VOR during high-frequency head rotation testing, where the VOR is more physiologically relevant. We tested eight normal subjects over three sessions. For training protocol 1, subjects performed active sinusoidal head rotations at 1.3 Hz while tracking a laser target, whose velocity incrementally increased relative to head velocity so that the VOR gain required to stabilize the target went from 1.1 to 2 over 15 min. Protocol 2 was the same as protocol 1, except that head rotations were at 0.5 Hz. For protocol 3, head rotation frequency incrementally increased from 0.5 to 2 Hz over 15 min, while the VOR gain required to stabilize the target was kept at 2. We measured the active and passive, sinusoidal (1.3Hz) and head impulse VOR gains before and after each protocol. Sinusoidal and head impulse VOR gains increased in protocols 1 and 3; however, although the sinusoidal VOR gain increase was ~20%, the related head impulse gain increase was only ~10%. Protocol 2 resulted in no-gain adaptation. These data show human VOR adaptation is frequency selective, suggesting that if one seeks to increase the higher-frequency VOR response, i.e., where it is physiologically most relevant, then higher-frequency head movements are required during training, e.g., head impulses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that human vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation is frequency selective at frequencies >0.3 Hz. The VOR in response to mid- (1.3 Hz) and high-frequency (impulse) head rotations were measured before and after mid-frequency sinusoidal VOR adaptation training, revealing that the mid-frequency gain change was higher than high-frequency gain change. Thus, if one seeks to increase the higher-frequency VOR response, where it is physiologically most relevant, then higher-frequency head movements are required during training.

New advances regarding adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex

This is a review summarizing the development of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation behavior with relevance to rehabilitation over the last 10 years and examines VOR adaptation using head-on-body rotations, specifically the influence of training target contrast, position and velocity error signal, active vs. passive head rotations, and sinusoidal vs. head impulse rotations. This review discusses optimization of the single VOR adaptation training session, consolidation between repeated training sessions, and dynamic incremental VOR adaptation. Also considered are the effects of aging and the roles of the efferent vestibular system, cerebellum, and otoliths on angular VOR adaptation. Finally, this review examines VOR adaptation findings in studies using whole body rotations.

VOR adaptation training and retention in a patient with profound bilateral vestibular hypofunction

A novel training method known as incremental VOR adaptation (IVA) can improve the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain for both active and passive head rotation by coupling active head rotations with a laser-projected target that moves in the opposite direction of the head at a fraction of the head velocity. A 51-year-old male with bilateral vestibular hypofunction participated in a research protocol using a portable IVA device for 645 days. Passive VOR gains improved 179% to 600%; standing posture and gait also improved. Motor learning within the vestibular system using the IVA method is possible after severe vestibular pathology. Laryngoscope, 129:2568-2573, 2019.

Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Training: Time Beats Quantity

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the main gaze stabilising system during rapid head movements. The VOR is highly plastic and its gain (eye/head velocity) can be increased via training that induces an incrementally increasing retinal image slip error signal to drive VOR adaptation. Using the unilateral incremental VOR adaptation technique and horizontal active head impulses as the vestibular stimulus, we sought to determine the factors important for VOR adaptation including: the total training time, ratio and number of head impulses to each side (adapting and non-adapting sides; the adapting side was pseudo-randomised left or right) and exposure time to the visual target during each head impulse. We tested 11 normal subjects, each over 5 separate sessions and training protocols. The basic training protocol (protocol one) consisted of unilateral incremental VOR adaptation training lasting 15 min with the ratio of head impulses to each side 1:1. Each protocol varied from the basic. For protocol two, the ratio of impulses were in favour of the adapting side by 2:1. For protocol three, all head impulses were towards the adapting side and the training only lasted 7.5 min. For protocol four, all impulses were towards the adapting side and lasted 15 min. For protocol five, all head impulses were to the adapting side and the exposure time to the visual target during each impulse was doubled. We measured the active and passive VOR gains before and after the training. Albeit with small sample size, our data suggest that the total training time and the visual target exposure time for each head impulse affected adaptation, whereas the total number and repetition rate of head impulses did not. These data have implications for vestibular rehabilitation, suggesting that quality and duration of VOR adaptation exercises are more important than rapid repetition of exercises.

Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation: Consolidation Time Between Repeated Training Blocks Improves Retention

We sought to determine if separating vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation training into training blocks with a consolidation (rest) period in between repetitions would result in improved VOR adaptation and retention. Consolidation of motor learning refers to the brain benefitting from a rest period after prior exposure to motor training. The role of consolidation on VOR adaptation is unknown, though clinicians often recommend rest periods as a part of vestibular rehabilitation. The VOR is the main gaze stabilising system during rapid head movements. The VOR is highly plastic and its gain (eye/head velocity) can be increased via training that induces an incrementally increasing retinal image slip error signal to drive VOR adaptation. The unilateral incremental adaptation technique typically consists of one 15-min training block leading to an increase in VOR gain of ~ 10 % towards the training side. We tested nine normal subjects, each over six separate sessions/days. Three training protocols/sessions were 5 min each (1 × 5-min training) and three training protocols/sessions were 55 min each. Each 55-min protocol comprised 5-min training, 20-min rest, 5-min training, 20-min rest, 5-min training (3 × 5-min training). Active and passive VOR gains were measured before and after training. For training with consolidation breaks, VOR gain retention was measured over 1 h. The VOR gain increase after 1 × 5-min training was 3.1 ± 2.1 % (P < 0.01). One might expect that repeating this training three times would result in × 3 total increase of 9.3 %; however, the gain increase after 3 × 5-min training was only 7.1 ± 2.8 % (P < 0.001), suggesting that consolidation did not improve VOR adaptation for our protocols. However, retention was improved by the addition of consolidation breaks, i.e. gains did not decrease over 1 h (P = 0.43). These data suggest that for optimal retention VOR adaptation exercises should be performed over shorter repeated blocks.

Optimal Human Passive Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Does Not Rely on Passive Training

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the main vision-stabilising system during rapid head movements in humans. A visual-vestibular mismatch stimulus can be used to train or adapt the VOR response because it induces a retinal image slip error signal that drives VOR motor learning. The training context has been shown to affect VOR adaptation. We sought to determine whether active (self-generated) versus passive (externally imposed) head rotation vestibular training would differentially affect adaptation and short-term retention of the active and passive VOR responses. Ten subjects were tested, each over six separate 1.5-h sessions. We compared active versus passive head impulse (transient, rapid head rotations with peak velocity ~ 150 °/s) VOR adaptation training lasting 15 min with the VOR gain challenged to increment, starting at unity, by 0.1 every 90 s towards one side only (this adapting side was randomised to be either left or right). The VOR response was tested/measured in darkness at 10-min intervals, 20-min intervals, and two single 60-min interval sessions for 1 h post-training. The training was active or passive for the 10- and 20-min interval sessions, but only active for the two single 60-min interval sessions. The mean VOR response increase due to training was ~ 10 % towards the adapting side versus ~2 % towards the non-adapting side. There was no difference in VOR adaptation and retention between active and passive VOR training. The only factor to affect retention was exposure to a de-adaptation stimulus. These data suggest that active VOR adaptation training can be used to optimally adapt the passive VOR and that adaptation is completely retained over 1 h as long as there is no visual feedback signal driving de-adaptation.

The Effect of Visual Contrast on Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the main retinal image stabilising mechanism during rapid head movement. When the VOR does not stabilise the world or target image on the retina, retinal image slip occurs generating an error signal that drives the VOR response to increase or decrease until image slip is minimised, i.e. VOR adaptation occurs. Visual target contrast affects the human smooth pursuit and optokinetic reflex responses. We sought to determine if contrast also affected VOR adaptation. We tested 12 normal subjects, each over 16 separate sessions. For sessions 1-14, the ambient light level (lx) during adaptation training was as follows: dark, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 and 255 lx (light level for a typical room). For sessions 15-16, the laser target power (related to brightness) was halved with ambient light at 0 and 0.1 lx. The adaptation training lasted 15 min and consisted of left/right active head impulses. The VOR gain was challenged to increment, starting at unity, by 0.1 every 90 s for rotations to the designated adapting side and fixed at unity towards the non-adapting side. We measured active and passive VOR gains before and after adaptation training. We found that for both the active and passive VOR, there was a significant increase in gain only towards the adapting side due to training at contrast level 1.5 k and above (2 lx and below). At contrast level 261 and below (16 lx and above), adaptation training resulted in no difference between adapting and non-adapting side gains. Our modelling suggests that a contrast threshold of ~ 1000, which is 60 times higher than that provided by typical room lighting, must be surpassed for robust active and passive VOR adaptation. Our findings suggest contrast is an important factor for adaptation, which has implication for rehabilitation programs.

Mechanisms underlying vestibulo-cerebellar motor learning in mice depend on movement direction

KEY POINTS

Directionality, inherent to movements, has behavioural and neuronal correlates. Direction of vestibular stimulation determines motor learning efficiency. Vestibulo-ocular reflex gain-increase correlates with Purkinje cell simple spike potentiation. The locus of neural correlates for vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation is paradigm specific.

ABSTRACT

Compensatory eye movements elicited by head rotation, also known as vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), can be adapted with the use of visual feedback. The cerebellum is essential for this type of movement adaptation, although its neuronal correlates remain to be clarified. In the present study, we show that the direction of vestibular input determines the magnitude of eye movement adaptation induced by mismatched visual input in mice, with larger changes during contraversive head rotation. Moreover, the location of the neural correlate of this changed behaviour depends on the type of paradigm. Gain-increase paradigms induce increased simple spike (SS) activity in ipsilateral cerebellar Purkinje cells (PC), which is in line with eye movements triggered by optogenetic PC activation. By contrast, gain-decrease paradigms do not induce changes in SS activity, indicating that the murine vestibulo-cerebellar cortical circuitry is optimally designed to enhance ipsiversive eye movements.

Multiple timescales in the adaptation of the rotational VOR

Goal-directed movements, such as pointing and saccades, have been shown to share similar neural architectures, in spite of the different neuromuscular systems producing them. Such structure involve an inverse model of the actuator being controlled, which produces the commands innervating the muscles, and a forward model of the actuator, which predicts the sensory consequences of such commands and allows online movement corrections. Recent studies have shown that goal-directed movements also share similar motor-learning and motor-memory mechanisms, which are based on multiple timescales. The hypothesis that also the rotational vestibulo-ocular reflex (rVOR) may be based on a similar architecture has been presented recently. We hypothesize that multiple timescales are the brain's solution to the plasticity-stability dilemma, allowing adaptation to temporary and sudden changes while keeping stable motor-control abilities. If that were the case, then we would also expect the adaptation of reflex movements to follow the same principles. Thus we studied rVOR gain adaptation in eight healthy human subjects using a custom paradigm aimed at investigating the existence of spontaneous recovery, which we considered as the hallmark of multiple timescales in motor learning. Our experimental results show that spontaneous recovery occurred in six of eight subjects. Thus we developed a mathematical model of rVOR adaptation based on two hidden-states processes, which adapts the cerebellar-forward model of the ocular motor plant, and show that it accurately simulates our experimental data on rVOR gain adaptation, whereas a single timescale learning process fails to do so.

Impact of aging on long-term ocular reflex adaptation

Compensatory eye movements (CEMs) stabilize the field of view enabling visual sharpness despite self-induced motion or environmental perturbations. The vestibulocerebellum makes it possible to adapt these reflex behaviors to perform optimally under novel circumstances that are sustained over time. Because of this and the fact that the eye is relatively insensitive to fatigue and musculoskeletal aging effects, CEMs form an ideal motor system to assess aging effects on cerebellar motor learning. In the present study, we performed an extensive behavioral examination of the impact of aging on both basic CEMs and oculomotor-based learning paradigms spanning multiple days. Our data show that healthy aging has little to no effect on basic CEM performance despite sensory deterioration, suggesting a central compensatory mechanism. Young mice are capable of adapting their oculomotor output to novel conditions rapidly and accurately, even to the point of reversing the direction of the reflex entirely. However, oculomotor learning and consolidation capabilities show a progressive decay as age increases.