Delayed Treatment of Iatrogenic Brachial Arteriovenous Fistula

Iatrogenic vascular injuries may occur during venipuncture, arterial cannulation, or catheterization procedures. Brachial arteriovenous fistula (AVF) resulting from antecubital vascular access is rare and develops slowly. We report the case of an 18-year-old man who had developed iatrogenic brachial AVF. He had a history of several venipunctures in the left arm at the age of 10 months. Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomographic angiography were used to establish a diagnosis of brachial AVF, and surgical correction of the AVF was performed. As our case indicates, delayed surgery can be considered as a treatment option and may be associated with a decreased risk of vascular complications in the management of iatrogenic brachial AVF in infants.

Non-operative management is feasible for selected blunt trauma patients with pericardial effusion

BACKGROUND

Blunt pericardial effusion (BPE) in trauma patients can be suggestive of injuries to the heart or great vessels. Surgical exploration is the mainstay of management; however, the effectiveness of non-operative management in this patient group remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients presenting with BPE in the trauma registry system at our level I trauma center were reviewed. Patients with and without cardiovascular (CVS) injury were compared to identify predictors for CVS injury and to understand the factors related to the requirement for surgery. Patients with and without CVS injury who presented with stable hemodynamics and initially received conservative management were also compared.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 53.2 (standard deviation (SD) 18.0) years and a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 26.7 (SD 9.0). Eleven patients presented with systolic blood pressure (SBP)<100mmHg, and immediate surgical intervention was performed. Eight patients had evidence of CVS injury (73%). Nineteen patients had stable hemodynamics and initially received conservative treatment. Of these, twelve patients received further surgical interventions, and only three had evidence of CVS injury (16%, 3/19). Comparisons of individuals with and without CVS injury revealed that the SBP on presentation was higher in patients without CVS injury than in those with CVS injury (132.7 (SD 41.3) mmHg vs. 95.6 (SD 21.1) mmHg). Clinically irrelevant differences between the two groups were observed for the creatine kinase (CK)-MB level, the troponin I level, the presence of an echocardiography tamponade sign, associated chest trauma and ISS. No remarkable predictors for CVS injury were found in hemodynamically stable patients.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative management can be considered for patents with traumatic BPE and stable hemodynamics; however, this approach must be performed at an institution with adequate facilities and well-trained staff.

Single centre experience of combat-related vascular injury in victims of Syrian conflict: Retrospective evaluation of risk factors associated with amputation

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the risk factors associated with amputation in cases with combat-related vascular injury (CRVI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 90 cases with CRVI treated between May 2011 and July 2013. The patients were divided into group I (n=69), in which the limb was salvaged and group II (n=21), in which the patients received amputation.

RESULTS

The overall and the secondary amputation rates were 23% and 18%, respectively. There were no amputations with the MESS of nine or less, increasing proportions of amputations at 10 and 11, with a level of 12 leading to 100% amputation rate. The mortality rate was 2%. Among the 52 (58%) cases with the mangled extremity severity score (MESS) ≥7, the limb salvage rate was 60%. The patients in group II were more likely to have a combined artery and vein injury (p=0.042). They were also more likely to be injured as a result of an explosion (p=0.004). Along with the MESS (p<0.001), the duration of ischemia (DoI) (p<0.001) were higher in group II. The rate of bony fracture (p<0.001) and wound infection (p=0.011) were higher in group II. For the overall amputation, the odds ratio of the bony fracture (OR: 61.39, p=0.011), nerve injury (OR: 136.23, p=0.004), DoI (OR: 2.03, p=0.003), vascular ligation (OR: 8.65, p=0.040) and explosive device injury (OR: 10.8, p=0.041) were significant. Although the DoI (p<0.001) and the MESS (p=0.004) were higher in whom a temporary vascular shunt (TVS) was applied, the utilisation of a TVS did not influence the amputation rate (p=1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The DoI and the variables indicating the extent of tissue disruption were the major determinants of amputation. While statistically non-significant, the benefit of the application of a TVS is non-negligible. MESS is a valid scoring system but should not be the sole foundation for deciding on amputation. Extremities which were doomed to amputation with the MESS>7 seem to benefit from revascularisation with initiation of reperfusion at once. The validity of MESS merits further investigation with regard to the determination of a new cut-off value under ever developing medical management strategies.

Liver resection for the treatment of post-cholecystectomy biliary stricture with vascular injury

AIM: To report experience with liver resection in a select group of patients with postoperative biliary stricture associated with vascular injury.

METHODS: From a prospective database of patients treated for benign biliary strictures at our hospital, cases that underwent liver resections were reviewed. All cases were referred after one or more attempts to repair bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy (open or laparoscopic). Liver resection was indicated in patients with Strasberg E3/E4 (hilar stricture) bile duct lesions associated with vascular damage (arterial and/or portal), ipsilateral liver atrophy/abscess, recurrent attacks of cholangitis, and failure of previous hepaticojejunostomy.

RESULTS: Of 148 patients treated for benign biliary strictures, nine (6.1%) underwent liver resection; eight women and one man with a mean age of 38.6 years. Six patients had previously been submitted to open cholecystectomy and three to laparoscopic surgery. The mean number of surgical procedures before definitive treatment was 2.4. All patients had Strasberg E3/E4 injuries, and vascular injury was present in all cases. Eight patients underwent right hepatectomy and one underwent left lateral sectionectomy without mortality. Mean time of follow up was 69.1 mo and after long-term follow up, eight patients are asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION: Liver resection is a good therapeutic option for patients with complex postoperative biliary stricture and vascular injury presenting with liver atrophy/abscess in which previous hepaticojejunostomy has failed.