The Omission of Genitourinary Physical Exam in Telehealth Pre-Vasectomy Consults Does Not Reduce Rates of Office Procedure Completion

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the omission of pre-procedure genitourinary exam for vasectomy inherent to a virtual consultation reduces the likelihood of successfully completing in-office vasectomy. Currently, the AUA Vasectomy guidelines encourage in-person examination when possible, though COVID-19 has catalyzed the uptake of virtual consultations at many institutions. We hypothesized that rates of completed in-office vasectomy do not significantly differ between patients examined during consultation in the office and those seen virtually with no exam.

METHODS

Virtual vasectomy consults from April to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and compared to a size-matched, randomly-selected control group who underwent in-office vasectomy consultation. The primary outcome was completion of in-office bilateral vasectomy. Baseline demographic characteristics were compared. Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test were performed on categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 211 patients who underwent virtual vasectomy consultation during the study period, 153 presented for in-office vasectomy. They were compared to 153 vasectomies from the in-person consult cohort. No demographic differences were observed between virtual and in-office consult groups. No statistical difference was observed in completion rates of in-office vasectomy, which was 97.4% (149/153) in the virtual consult cohort and 98.7% (151/153) in the in-office consultation cohort (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of completed in-office vasectomy did not significantly differ based on consult platform, suggesting that a pre-vasectomy physical exam is not required to predict successful completion of the procedure. Telehealth should be utilized as an additional platform to improve access for male contraceptive procedures in a young and busy population.