Mapping the genetic architecture of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Meta-analysis and epidemiological evidence of case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and devastating fibrotic lung disorder with unknown etiology. Although it is believed that genetic component is an important risk factor for IPF, a comprehensive understanding of its genetic landscape is lacking. Hence, we aimed to highlight the susceptibility genes and pathways implicated in IPF pathogenesis through a two-staged systematic literature search of genetic association studies on IPF, followed by meta-analysis and pathway enrichment analysis.

METHODS

This study was performed based on PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42022297970). The first search was performed (using PubMed and Web of Science) retrieving a total of 5642 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion in the first stage. The second search was performed (using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) for ten polymorphisms, identified from the first search, with 2 or more studies. Finally, seven polymorphisms, [rs35705950/MUC5B, rs2736100/TERT, rs2609255/FAM13A, rs2076295/DSP, rs12610495/DPP9, rs111521887/TOLLIP and rs1800470/TGF-β1] qualified for meta-analyses. The epidemiological credibility was evaluated using Venice criteria.

RESULTS

From the systematic review, 222 polymorphisms in 118 genes showed a significant association with IPF susceptibility. Meta-analyses findings revealed significant association of rs35705950/T [OR = 3.92(3.26-4.57)], rs2609255/G [OR = 1.50(1.18-1.82)], rs2076295/G [OR = 1.19(0.82-1.756)], rs12610495/G [OR = 1.28(1.12-1.44)], rs2736100/C [OR = 0.68(0.54-0.82), rs111521887/G [OR = 1.34(1.06-1.61)] and suggestive evidence for rs1800470/T [OR = 1.08(0.82-1.34)] with IPF susceptibility. Four polymorphisms- rs35705950/MUC5B, rs2736100/TERT, rs2076295/DSP and rs111521887/TOLLIP, exhibited substantial epidemiological evidence supporting their association with IPF risk. Gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis performed on IPF risk-associated genes identified a critical role of genes in mucin production, immune response and inflammation, host defence, cell-cell adhesion and telomere maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings present the most prominent IPF-associated genetic risk variants involved in alveolar epithelial injuries (MUC5B, TERT, FAM13A, DSP, DPP9) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (TOLLIP, TGF-β1), providing genetic and biological insights into IPF pathogenesis. However, further experimental research and human studies with larger sample sizes, diverse ethnic representation, and rigorous design are warranted.

Association Between MTHFR Polymorphisms and the Risk of Essential Hypertension: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the 1990s, there have been a lot of research on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and different diseases, including many studies on 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism and essential hypertension (EH). Nevertheless, their conclusions were controversial. So far, six previous meta-analyses discussed the internal relationship between the MTHFR polymorphism and EH, respectively. However, they did not evaluate the credibility of the positive associations. To build on previous meta-analyses, we updated the literature by including previously included papers as well as nine new articles, improved the inclusion criteria by also considering the quality of the papers, and applied new statistical techniques to assess the observed associations.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the degree of risk correlation between two MTHFR polymorphisms and EH.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wan Fang electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. We evaluated the relation between the MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131) polymorphisms and EH by calculating the odds ratios (OR) as well as 95% confidence intervals (CI). Here we used subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, cumulative meta-analysis, assessment of publication bias, meta-regression meta, False-positive report probability (FPRP), Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP), and Venice criterion.

RESULTS

Overall, harboring the variant of MTHFR C677T was associated with an increased risk of EH in the overall populations, East Asians, Southeast Asians, South Asians, Caucasians/Europeans, and Africans. After the sensitivity analysis, positive results were found only in the overall population (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.30, P _h = 0.032, I ² = 39.8%; TT + TC vs. CC: OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29, P _h = 0.040, I ² = 38.1%; T vs. C: OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.25, P _h = 0.005, I ² = 50.2%) and Asian population (TC vs. CC: OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.28, P _h = 0.265, I ² = 16.8%; TT + TC vs. CC: OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.30, P _h = 0.105, I ² = 32.9%; T vs. C: OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.19, P _h = 0.018, I ² = 48.6%). However, after further statistical assessment by FPRP, BFDP, and Venice criteria, the positive associations reported here could be deemed to be false-positives and present only weak evidence for a causal relationship. In addition, when we performed pooled analysis and sensitivity analysis on MTHFR A1298C; all the results were negative.

CONCLUSION

The positive relationships between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms with the susceptibility to present with hypertension were not robust enough to withstand statistical interrogation by FPRP, BFDP, and Venice criteria. Therefore, these SNPs are probably not important in EH etiology.