Responsiveness of Persian Version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), Persian Version of Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat in Vocal Mass Lesions with Muscle Tension Dysphonia

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed at determining the internal and external responsiveness of the Persian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (called ATSHA), Persian version of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat scales among patients with vocal mass lesions and secondary muscle tension dysphonia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, within-participant repeated measures.

METHOD

Thirty patients with vocal fold nodules, polyps, and cysts related to secondary muscle tension dysphonia participated in the study. The measures of interest and videostroboscopy examination were used before and after treatment. The Global Perceived Effect questionnaire was used to separate those improved (moderately or greatly improved) and stable (slightly improved) patients.

RESULTS

The mean standardized response, standardized effect size, and Guyatt analyses indicated high internal responsiveness for the all target parameters of the ATSHA, total score of the VHI, and two parameters of the Praat (0.8<). There was poor correlation between the videostroboscopy and the other target scales (r _Pearson = -0.1-0.1). The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that all the target scales did not significantly separate those improved and stable subjects (area under the curve = 0), except for the overall severity and roughness parameters of the ATSHA scale (area under the curve = 1).

CONCLUSION

This study recommends both the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice and the VHI scales to show voice therapy changes. The target voice scale changes were not able to predict the videostroboscopy changes as external standard. Furthermore, we recommend that the overall severity and roughness may properly classify those improved and stable patients.

Patient-Based Assessment of Effectiveness of Voice Therapy in Vocal Mass Lesions with Secondary Muscle Tension Dysphonia

INTRODUCTION

Use of patient-based voice assessment scales is an appropriate method that is frequently used to demonstrate effectiveness of voice therapy. This study was aimed at determining the effectiveness of voice therapy among patients with secondary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) and vocal mass lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study design was prospective, with within-participant repeated measures. Thirty-three patients with secondary MTD and vocal mass lesions participated in the study, selected on the basis of voice history, laryngeal palpation, and videostroboscopy examination. An experienced otolaryngologist and one experienced speech language pathologist undertook the diagnostic process. Voice therapy included both direct and indirect techniques and lasted approximately 2 months for all included patients. The voice handicap index (VHI) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of voice therapy among included patients. Paired t-test, size of the standardized effect (ESI), and mean standardized response (ESII) were used to analyze effectiveness of the target voice therapy.

RESULTS

The findings of this study indicate a statistically significant improvement after the voice therapy protocol (P<0.05; t>1.96). Results of ESI and ESII demonstrate that the VHI scale is sufficiently responsive to detect voice therapy change (ES>0.8).

CONCLUSION

This study recommends a combination of direct and indirect voice therapy in the vocal rehabilitation of patients with secondary MTD and vocal mass lesions. Furthormore, we recommend use of the VHI scale to show voice therapy changes for both clinical and research purposes.