Abdominal ultrasound in the characterization of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: A new tool for surveillance of low-risk patients?

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as gold-standard for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) follow-up. Given the low risk of transformation and the increasing population under surveillance, there is growing interest in identifying optimal follow-up strategies.

AIM

To evaluate reliability of abdominal ultrasound (US) for characterization of low-risk IPMN, compared to MRI.

METHODS

Prospective monocentric study among 79 consecutive patients with a suspected BD-IPMN on US. Each patient underwent confirmatory MRI. We evaluated Cohen's kappa statistic and concordance rate (CR) between MRI and US.

RESULTS

Of 79 suspected IPMNs on US, MRI confirmed 71 BD-IPMNs. There was high agreement for cyst location and number (CR and kappa of 77.5 % and 81.7 % and 0.66±0.08 and 0.62±0.11 respectively). We found high agreement for cyst size (CR=96.5 %, kappa=0.93±0.05) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (CR=100 %, kappa=1). There was a good agreement for thickened septa (CR=80.3 %, kappa=0.38±0.12). US seems inferior to MRI for the identification of mural nodules < 5 mm (CR=97.2 %, kappa=0).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of low-risk BD-IPMN, US presented high agreement rate with MRI regarding location, number, and size. There was a good agreement for MPD dilatation and thickened septa, while US underperform for detection of mural nodules < 5 mm.

The validity of the surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas advocated by the 2017 revised International Association of Pancreatology consensus guidelines

PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) advocated by the 2017 revised International Association of Pancreatology consensus guidelines (IAPCG2017).

METHODS

The medical records of 63 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for IPMN were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had main-duct IPMN, 25 had mixed IPMN, and 25 had branch-duct IPMN with frequencies of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma of 62, 24, and 28%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of high-risk stigmata for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma advocated by the IAPCG2017 were 90 and 67%, respectively. Of 17 patients with invasive carcinoma, all patients had high-risk stigmata, and 16 had an enhanced mural nodule (MN) of ≥ 5 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of a ≥ 5-mm enhanced MN for predicting invasive carcinoma were 94% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing a size threshold for enhanced MNs into the assessment of high-risk stigmata increases the specificity without jeopardizing the sensitivity. The surgical indication for any type of IPMN may be determined using only a ≥ 5-mm enhanced MN. When the type of IPMN is classified strictly, about half of IPMNs are mixed type, and most are benign. The surgical indication for mixed IPMN should be reconsidered.

Validity of the management strategy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm advocated by the international consensus guidelines 2012: a retrospective review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of the management strategy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) advocated by the international consensus guidelines 2012 (ICG2012).

METHODS

The medical records of 49 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for IPMN were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

According to preoperative imaging, 10 patients (20 %) had main-duct IPMNs, 20 (41 %) had mixed IPMNs, and 19 (39 %) had branch-duct IPMNs, with malignancy frequencies of 80, 15, and 37 %, respectively. Twenty-seven patients had high-risk stigmata and 21 had worrisome features, with malignancy frequencies of 59 and 10 %, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of high-risk stigmata for malignancy were 88, 65, 59, and 91 %, respectively. Lesions were malignant in 88 % of patients with an enhanced solid component, which was significantly correlated with the prevalence of malignancy (P < 0.01). However, of the 10 patients who underwent pancreatectomy solely due to a main pancreatic dilation of ≥10 mm, 9 (90 %) had benign IPMNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Many mixed IPMNs defined according to ICG2012 are benign. Although the management strategy advocated by ICG2012 has been improved relative to the Sendai criteria, the different high-risk stigmata carry unequal weights. Consequently, ICG2012 remains suboptimal for predicting malignant IPMN.