How many Mutations are needed to Evolve the Chemical Makeup of a Synthetic Cell?

The chemical evolution of a synthetic cell endowed with a synthetic amino acid as building block, analog to tryptophan, required the emergence of key mutations in genes involved in, inter alia, the general stress response, amino acid metabolism, stringent response, and chemotaxis. Understanding adaptation mechanisms to non-canonical biomass components will inform strategies for engineering synthetic metabolic pathways and cells.

What Would an Alien Amino Acid Alphabet Look Like and Why?

Life on Earth builds genetically encoded proteins by using a standard alphabet of just 20 L-α-amino acids, although many others were available to life's origins and early evolution. To better understand the causes of this foundational evolutionary outcome, we extend previous analyses which have identified a highly unusual distribution of biophysical properties within the set used by life. Specifically, we use a heuristic search algorithm to identify other sets of amino acids, from a library of plausible alternatives, that emulate life's signature. We find that a subset of amino acids seems predisposed to forming such sets. We present other examples of such alphabets under various assumptions, along with analysis and reasoning about why each might be simplistic. We do so to introduce the central, open question that remains: while fundamental biophysics related to protein folding can potentially reduce a library of 10⁵⁴ possible amino acid alphabets by 7 orders of magnitude, the framework of assumptions that does so leaves a further 10⁴⁵ possibilities. It is therefore tempting to ask what additional assumptions can further reduce these 45 orders of magnitude? We thus conclude with a focus on library and alphabet construction as a useful target for subsequent research that may help future science speak with more confidence about what an alien amino acid alphabet would look like and why.

A metric space for semantic containment: Towards the implementation of genetic firewalls

Analysing or engineering the genetic code has mainly been considered as an approach to reduce or increase the mutational robustness of the genetic code, i.e. the error tolerance in DNA mutations, or to enable the incorporation of non-canonical amino acids. The approach of "semantic containment", however, is less interested in altering the mutational tolerance of the standard code, but to create synthetic alternative genetic codes that limit or all together impede horizontal gene transfer between a natural and genomically recoded organisms (GRO). A major claim or conjecture of semantic containment is: "the farther, the safer", meaning, the less similarity there is between two codes, the less chance of a horizontal gene transfer, and the stronger the genetic firewall. So far, no metrics were available to measure and quantify the "genetic distance" between different genetic codes. Such a metric, however, is iis paramount to allow the experimental testing and evaluation of the validity of semantic biocontainment for the first time. Here, we introduce a metric space to measure exactly the distance (dissimilarity) between different genetic codes, in order to provide a framework to evaluate the relation between distance and strength of a genetic firewall. Results are presented that incorporate bespoken metrics when producing alternative genetic codes according to predefined goals, specifications and limitations. Finally, as an outlook, implications and challenges for genetic firewall(s) are discussed for dual- and multi-code systems.

Xenobiology: State-of-the-Art, Ethics, and Philosophy of New-to-Nature Organisms

The basic chemical constitution of all living organisms in the context of carbon-based chemistry consists of a limited number of small molecules and polymers. Until the twenty-first century, biology was mainly an analytical science and has now reached a point where it merges with engineering science, paving the way for synthetic biology. One of the objectives of synthetic biology is to try to change the chemical compositions of living cells, that is, to create an artificial biological diversity, which in turn fosters a new sub-field of synthetic biology, xenobiology. In particular, the genetic code in living systems is based on highly standardized chemistry composed of the same "letters" or nucleotides as informational polymers (DNA, RNA) and the 20 amino acids which serve as basic building blocks for proteins. The universality of the genetic code enables not only vertical gene transfer within the same species but also horizontal gene transfer across biological taxa, which require a high degree of standardization and interconnectivity. Although some minor alterations of the standard genetic code are found in nature (e.g., proteins containing non-conical amino acids exist in nature, and some organisms use alternated coding systems), all structurally deep chemistry changes within living systems are generally lethal, making the creation of artificial biological system an extremely difficult challenge.In this context, one of the great challenges for bioscience is the development of a strategy for expanding the standard basic chemical repertoire of living cells. Attempts to alter the meaning of the genetic information stored in DNA as an informational polymer by changing the chemistry of the polymer (i.e., xeno-nucleic acids) or by changes in the genetic code have already yielded successful results. In the future this should enable the partial or full redirection of the biological information flow to generate "new" version(s) of the genetic code derived from the "old" biological world.In addition to the scientific challenges, the attempt to increase biochemical diversity also raises important ethical and philosophical issues. Although promotors of this branch of synthetic biology highlight the many potential applications to come (e.g., novel tools for diagnostics and fighting infection diseases), such developments could also bring risks affecting social, political, and other structures of nearly all societies.

Synthetic alienation of microbial organisms by using genetic code engineering: Why and how?

The main goal of synthetic biology (SB) is the creation of biodiversity applicable for biotechnological needs, while xenobiology (XB) aims to expand the framework of natural chemistries with the non-natural building blocks in living cells to accomplish artificial biodiversity. Protein and proteome engineering, which overcome limitation of the canonical amino acid repertoire of 20 (+2) prescribed by the genetic code by using non-canonic amino acids (ncAAs), is one of the main focuses of XB research. Ideally, estranging the genetic code from its current form via systematic introduction of ncAAs should enable the development of bio-containment mechanisms in synthetic cells potentially endowing them with a "genetic firewall" i.e. orthogonality which prevents genetic information transfer to natural systems. Despite rapid progress over the past two decades, it is not yet possible to completely alienate an organism that would use and maintain different genetic code associations permanently. In order to engineer robust bio-contained life forms, the chemical logic behind the amino acid repertoire establishment should be considered. Starting from recent proposal of Hartman and Smith about the genetic code establishment in the RNA world, here the authors mapped possible biotechnological invasion points for engineering of bio-contained synthetic cells equipped with non-canonical functionalities.