Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study

Background

Bisphosphonates are a class of medication commonly used to treat osteoporosis. Alendronate is recommended as the first-line treatment; however, long-term adherence (both treatment compliance and persistence) is poor. Alternative bisphosphonates are available, which can be given intravenously and have been shown to improve long-term adherence. However, the most clinically effective and cost-effective alternative bisphosphonate regimen remains unclear. What is the most cost-effective bisphosphonate in clinical trials may not be the most cost-effective or acceptable to patients in everyday clinical practice.

Objectives

1. Explore patient, clinician and stakeholder views, experiences and preferences of alendronate compared to alternative bisphosphonates. 2. Update and refine the 2016 systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of bisphosphonates, and estimate the value of further research into their benefits. 3. Undertake stakeholder/consensus engagement to identify important research questions and further rank research priorities.

Methods

The study was conducted in two stages, stages 1A and 1B in parallel, followed by stage 2: • Stage 1A - we elicited patient and healthcare experiences to understand their preferences of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. This was undertaken by performing a systematic review and framework synthesis of qualitative studies, followed by semistructured qualitative interviews with participants. • Stage 1B - we updated and expanded the existing Health Technology Assessment systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness model, incorporating a more comprehensive review of treatment efficacy, safety, side effects, compliance and long-term persistence. • Stage 2 - we identified and ranked further research questions that need to be answered about the effectiveness and acceptability of bisphosphonates.

Results

Patients and healthcare professionals identified a number of challenges in adhering to bisphosphonate medication, balancing the potential for long-term risk reduction against the work involved in adhering to oral alendronate. Intravenous zoledronate treatment was generally more acceptable, with such regimens perceived to be more straightforward to engage in, although a portion of patients taking alendronate were satisfied with their current treatment. Intravenous zoledronate was found to be the most effective, with higher adherence rates compared to the other bisphosphonates, for reducing the risk of fragility fracture. However, oral bisphosphonates are more cost-effective than intravenous zoledronate due to the high cost of zoledronate administration in hospital. The importance of including patients and healthcare professionals when setting research priorities is recognised. Important areas for research were related to patient factors influencing treatment selection and effectiveness, how to optimise long-term care and the cost-effectiveness of delivering zoledronate in an alternative, non-hospital setting.

Conclusions

Intravenous zoledronate treatment was generally more acceptable to patients and found to be the most effective bisphosphonate and with greater adherence; however, the cost-effectiveness relative to oral alendronate is limited by its higher zoledronate hospital administration costs.

Future work

Further research is needed to support people to make decisions influencing treatment selection, effectiveness and optimal long-term care, together with the clinical and cost-effectiveness of intravenous zoledronate administered in a non-hospital (community) setting.

Limitations

Lack of clarity and limitations in the many studies included in the systematic review may have under-interpreted some of the findings relating to effects of bisphosphonates.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN10491361.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127550) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 21. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Effect of a Three-Day Course of Dexamethasone on Acute Phase Response Following Treatment With Zoledronate: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zoledronate is a potent intravenous bisphosphonate effective in the management of osteoporosis, Paget's disease and skeletal-related events in malignancy. Its most frequent adverse effect is the acute phase response (APR), an inflammatory reaction characterized by fever, musculoskeletal pain, headache, and nausea. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy of a three-day course of dexamethasone 4 mg daily in reducing incidence of APR. Participants (n = 60) were randomized to receive either 4 mg of oral dexamethasone 1.5 hours before zoledronate and once a day for the following 2 days, or placebo. Oral temperature was measured at baseline and three times a day for the following 3 days, and questionnaires assessing symptoms of the APR were completed at baseline and for 3 days following zoledronate. Use of anti-inflammatory medication in the 3 days following zoledronate was recorded. The primary outcome was the temperature change from baseline. There was a significant difference in the primary outcome between the dexamethasone and placebo groups (p < 0.0001), with a mean decrease in temperature of 0.10°C (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.34 to 0.14) in the dexamethasone group compared with a mean increase in temperature of 0.84°C (95% CI, 0.53-1.16) in the placebo group on the evening following zoledronate. There was also a difference in APR-related symptom score over time between the two groups (p = 0.0005), with a median change in symptom score in the dexamethasone group 1 day after zoledronate of 0 (95% CI, 0-1) compared with 3 (95% CI, 0-5) in the placebo group. An increase in temperature of ≥1°C to a temperature of >37.5°C occurred in two of 30 (6.7%) participants in the dexamethasone group compared with 14 of 30 participants (46.7%) in the placebo group (p = 0.0005). This study demonstrates that a 3-day course of dexamethasone substantially reduces the APR following zoledronate infusion. © 2023 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover 10 Years After a Single 5 mg Dose or Two 5-Yearly Lower Doses of Zoledronate in Osteopenic Older Women: An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Intravenous zoledronate reduces fracture risk (5 mg at 18-month intervals) and prevents bone loss (doses of 1 to 5 mg for 3 to >5 years), but the duration of action of a single 5 mg dose and the effects of lower doses beyond 5 years are unknown. We report the second open-label extension (years 5 to 10) of a 2-year randomized, multidose, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. A total of 116 older women who completed 5 years of participation either continued observation without further treatment (zoledronate 5 mg and placebo at baseline) or received repeat doses of 1 or 2.5 mg zoledronate (zoledronate 1 mg and zoledronate 2.5 mg at baseline, respectively). Outcomes were spine, hip, and total body bone mineral density (BMD) and serum markers of bone turnover. After a single 5 mg dose of zoledronate, mean BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip was maintained at or above baseline levels for 9 and 10 years, respectively. The mean level of the bone resorption marker β-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) was at least 25% lower than that in the placebo group for 9 years. In women administered 5-yearly doses of 2.5 mg zoledronate, mean BMD at the total hip and lumbar spine was maintained at or above baseline levels for 9 and 10 years, respectively. Redosing with 1 or 2.5 mg zoledronate at 5 years reduced bone turnover markers for 3 to 4 years. BMD increased for 3 to 4 years after redosing with 1 mg zoledronate. In the group given 5-yearly 2.5 mg zoledronate, β-CTX was at least 20% lower than that in the placebo group for 10 years. Both a single baseline 5 mg dose of zoledronate and 5-yearly doses of 1 and 2.5 mg zoledronate prevented bone loss at hip and spine for 8 to 10 years in older postmenopausal women. Clinical trials to evaluate the effects on fracture risk of these very infrequent and lower doses of zoledronate are justified. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Predictors of Fracture in Older Women With Osteopenic Hip Bone Mineral Density Treated With Zoledronate

A recent analysis has found that during treatment with denosumab, women attaining higher bone densities (BMD) are less likely to have incident fractures. We have reexamined this important question using data from our recent trial of zoledronate in osteopenic women. One thousand women randomized to treatment with zoledronate were followed for 6 years. Of those, 122 sustained fragility fractures during follow-up. Baseline age, nonvertebral fracture history, total hip BMD, and calculated fracture risk were all significantly different between those who had fractures during the study and those who did not. BMDs achieved during the study were higher in those without incident fractures. However, achieved BMDs were very closely related to baseline values (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). The increase in BMD during zoledronate treatment was not different between those who had incident fractures and those who did not (0.15 < p < 0.78), and change in BMD was not predictive of fracture (univariate logistic regression analysis). Stepwise regression analysis of all baseline variables showed the best independent predictors of fracture to be age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.13, p = 0.0003), baseline spine BMD (OR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.96, p = 0.016), and history of nonvertebral fracture (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.06-2.69, p = 0.028). Addition of change in BMD to this model did not improve its predictive power. If changes in BMD were included in the stepwise regression analysis of baseline variables, they did not emerge as significant predictors of fracture. It is concluded that age, fracture history, and baseline BMD determine the risk of new fractures. Differences in achieved BMD between those who do or do not fracture arise from the close relationship between baseline and achieved BMDs. These findings suggest that targeting any particular BMD during treatment is unlikely to be a useful or valid strategy. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

A Drug Holiday Reduces the Frequency and Severity of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Minipig Model

Treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is challenging and no clear consensus has been achieved. This study investigated preventive measures recommended for tooth extractions under antiresorptive (AR) treatment and the role of discontinuation of AR therapy to avoid the onset of MRONJ in a minipig model. Thirty-six Göttingen minipigs were divided into four groups. Group 1 (negative control): tooth extractions but no zoledronate (ZOL). Group 2 (positive control): weekly ZOL infusions for 12 weeks followed by tooth extractions without wound management followed by 8 weeks of ZOL treatment. Group 3: weekly ZOL infusions for 12 weeks followed by tooth extractions; surgical wound management (resection of sharp bone edges, mucoperiosteal coverage); and continuation of ZOL infusions for 8 weeks plus antibiotic treatment. Group 4: 12 weeks of ZOL infusions followed by a drug holiday for 6 weeks. Tooth extractions with preventive wound management followed by antibiotic treatment for 8 weeks but no ZOL infusions. Jawbones were subjected to macroscopic, radiological (CT and micro-CT) and histopathological investigations. No clinical cases of MRONJ were observed in the negative group, in the positive control all animals developed MRONJ. Group 3 developed MRONJ in 83% of cases. With a drug holiday, 40% developed MRONJ in areas of tooth extraction. This is the first large animal model that reduces the occurrence of MRONJ following tooth extraction by the implementation of a drug holiday combined with antibiotic prophylaxis and smoothening of sharp bony edges. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research..

A Single Infusion of Zoledronate in Postmenopausal Women Following Denosumab Discontinuation Results in Partial Conservation of Bone Mass Gains

Discontinuation of denosumab is associated with a rapid return of bone mineral density (BMD) to baseline and an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures. No subsequent treatment regimen has yet been established for preventing either loss of BMD or multiple vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation. The aim of this 8-year observational study was to investigate the effect of a single zoledronate infusion, administered 6 months after the last denosumab injection, on fracture occurrence and loss of BMD. We report on 120 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who were treated with 60 mg denosumab every 6 months for 2 to 5 years (mean duration 3 years) and then 5 mg zoledronate 6 months after the last denosumab injection. All patients were evaluated clinically, by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), before the first and after the last denosumab injection and at 2.5 years (median) after denosumab discontinuation. During this off-treatment period, 3 vertebral fractures (1.1 per 100 patient-years) and 4 nonvertebral fractures (1.5 per 100 patient-years) occurred. No patients developed multiple vertebral fractures. Sixty-six percent (confidence interval [CI] 57% to 75%) of BMD gained with denosumab was retained at the lumbar spine and 49% (CI 31% to 67%) at the total hip. There was no significant difference in the decrease of BMD between patients with BMD gains of >9% versus <9% while treated with denosumab. Previous antiresorptive treatment or prevalent fractures had no impact on the decrease of BMD, and all bone loss occurred within the first 18 months after zoledronate infusion. In conclusion, a single infusion of 5 mg zoledronate after a 2- to 5-year denosumab treatment cycle retained more than half of the gained BMD and was not associated with multiple vertebral fractures, as reported in patients who discontinued denosumab without subsequent bisphosphonate treatment. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Effects of Intravenous Zoledronate on Bone Turnover and Bone Density Persist for at Least 11 Years in HIV-Infected Men

Previously we reported the results of a 4-year extension of a 2-year randomized placebo-controlled trial showing that the antiresorptive effects of two annual 4-mg doses of zoledronate in HIV-infected men persisted for at least 5 years after the second dose. We set out to determine whether the effects on BMD and bone turnover persist beyond 10 years. We invited all participants in the original trial known to be alive and living in New Zealand to attend an additional visit approximately 12 years after trial entry and 11 years after their second dose of study medication. The outcome measures were BMD at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and total body, and markers of bone turnover. Twenty-five of the 43 men originally enrolled in the trial attended the final visit, representing 25 of 31 (81%) participants alive and residing in New Zealand at the time. The average duration of follow-up was 12.4 years. At the final visit, BMD remained higher in the zoledronate group than the placebo group (lumbar spine 3.7%, 95% CI, 0.1 to 7.3; total hip 3.7%, 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.2; femoral neck 5.0%, 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.9; total body 2.4%, 95% CI, 0.7 to 4.0), and the between-group differences in BMD remained stable between 6 and 12 years. Serum CTx remained lower in the zoledronate group than the placebo group between 6 and 12 years and, at the final visit, was 45% lower (95% CI, 25 to 64) than the placebo group. P1NP was 26% (95% CI, 4 to 48) lower in the zoledronate group than the placebo group at the final visit. In summary, two annual 4-mg doses of zoledronate have effects on bone turnover and BMD in men that persist for at least 11 years after the second dose. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Durability of Response to Zoledronate Treatment and Competing Mortality in Paget's Disease of Bone

There has been a marked secular trend in recent decades toward patients with Paget's disease presenting at a greater age and having less extensive skeletal involvement. Over a similar time frame more potent bisphosphonates with a long duration of effect have been developed, raising the prospect of many patients needing only once in a lifetime treatment. We studied a cohort of 107 patients who had been treated with intravenous zoledronate for the first time at a mean age of 76 years. Sequential measurements of the bone turnover marker procollagen-1 NT-peptide (P1NP) were made for up to 10 years. By 9 years, 64% showed some loss of zoledronate effect (defined as a doubling of P1NP from the nadir value after treatment), but only 14% had a biochemical relapse (defined as a P1NP value >80 μg/L). The mortality rate was substantially greater than the relapse rate-by 10 years more than half the cohort had died (p < 0.0001). We conclude that for the majority of older people with Paget's disease a single intravenous infusion of zoledronate will provide disease suppression for the remainder of their lives. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Duration of antiresorptive effects of low-dose zoledronate in osteopenic postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Annual intravenous administration of 5 mg zoledronate decreases fracture risk, but the optimal dosing regimen for zoledronate has not been determined. We set out to evaluate the antiresorptive effects of a single administration of lower doses of zoledronate. A total of 180 postmenopausal women with osteopenia enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial over 2 years at an academic research center. Participants were randomized to a single baseline administration of intravenous zoledronate in doses of 1 mg, 2.5 mg, or 5 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in bone mineral density(BMD) at the lumbar spine. Secondary endpoints were change in BMD at the proximal femur and total body, and changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. After 2 years, the change in spine BMD was greater in each of the zoledronate groups than in the placebo group; values are mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) difference versus placebo: zoledronate 1 mg 4.4% [2.7% to 6.1%]; 2.5 mg 5.5% [3.9% to 7.2%]; 5 mg 5.3% [3.8% to 6.7%], p < 0.001 for each dose). Change in BMD at the total hip was greater in each of the zoledronate groups than the placebo group (mean [95% CI] difference versus placebo: zoledronate 1 mg 2.6% [1.5% to 3.7%]; 2.5 mg 4.4% [3.5% to 5.3%]; 5 mg 4.7% [3.7% to 5.7%], p < 0.001 for each dose). Each of the bone turnover markers, β-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) and procollagen type-I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), was lower in each of the 2.5-mg and 5-mg zoledronate groups than the placebo group throughout the trial (p < 0.001 versus placebo for each marker for each dose at each time point). For each endpoint, changes were similar in the 2.5-mg and 5-mg zoledronate groups, whereas those in the 1-mg group were smaller than those in the other zoledronate groups. These data demonstrate that single administrations of zoledronate 1 mg or 2.5 mg produce antiresorptive effects that persist for at least 2 years. Trials assessing the antifracture efficacy of intermittent low doses of zoledronate, in particular the 2.5-mg dose, are justified.