Individually adjusted absolute blood volume feedback control: A promising solution for intradialytic hypotension

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) remains one of the most frequent complications associated to hemodialysis (HD), frequently triggered by a reduction in absolute blood volume (ABV) not compensated by vascular refilling. A recently developed dilutional method allows routinary measurement of ABV and, by a simple algorithm, may turn blood volume monitor (BVM) guided UF (ultrafiltration) biofeedback into an ABV control, automatically adjusting UF rate to maintain ABV above a preset threshold. The aim of this study is to identify an individual critical ABV threshold and test the ability of an ABV feedback control to avoid IDH.

METHODS

We studied 24 patients throughout three consecutive midweek HD treatments. ABV and blood pressure (BP) were measured every 30 min and anytime the patient referred any symptoms to identify each patient's critical ABV (ABV at the time of hypotension). A fixed bolus dilution approach at the start of HD was used to calculate ABV. Then, patients were followed through three additional HD treatments and IDH development was analyzed.

FINDINGS

Seventy-one treatments performed in 24 patients. ABV monitoring showed a constant decrease as HD treatment progressed. Thirteen IDH events were observed in eight different patients, with a mean systolic BP drop in IDH treatments of 37.38 ± 4.31 mmHg and a mean adjusted ABV at hypotension of 71.07 ± 14.88 mL/kg. Critical ABV was individually set in patients prone to IDH. As expected, ABV feedback control successfully maintained ABV over preset critical ABV. IDH events were avoided in 21 out of 22 treatments performed. ABV drop was successfully reduced, as well as SBP drop (despite similar UF than prior to ABV feedback control implementation).

DISCUSSION

ABV feedback control avoided IDH in 21 out of 22 treatments performed by maintaining blood volume above critical ABV, significantly reducing ABV variations without compromising prescribed UF.

Fluid volume management in hemodialysis: never give up!

Every hemodialysis session starts with the question of how much fluid should be removed, which can currently not be answered precisely. Herein, we first revisit the "probing-dry-weight" concept, using the historical example of Tassin/France (practicing also "long, slow dialysis"): Mortality outcomes were, in the 1980s, better than registry data, but are nowadays similar to European average. In view of the negative primary end point in a recent trial on dry weight assessment, based on lung ultrasound-guided evaluation of fluid excess in the lungs, and a meta-analysis of prospective studies failing to show that bioimpedance-based interventions for correction of volume overload had a direct effect on all-cause mortality, we ask how to ever move forward. Clinical reasoning demands that as much information as possible should be gathered on the fluid status of patients undergoing dialysis. Besides body weight and blood pressure, measurements of bioimpedance and dialysate bolus-derived absolute blood volume can in principle be automatized, whereas lung ultrasound can be obtained routinely. In the era of machine learning, fluid management could consist of flexible target weight prescriptions, adjusted on a daily basis and accounting even for fluctuations in fluid-free body mass. In view of all the negative prospective results surrounding fluid management in hemodialysis, we propose this as a "never-give-up" approach.

Dynamics of vascular refilling in extended nocturnal hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Long dialysis treatments are generally assumed to mitigate the ultrafiltration (UF) induced volume perturbation and to improve vascular refilling because of reduced UF rates and sufficient time for volume re-equilibration. The time course of vascular refilling was therefore examined during extended nocturnal dialysis.

METHODS

For each hour of dialysis, vascular refilling volume was calculated from the absolute blood volume changes and UF volume removed. Absolute blood volume was estimated by indicator dilution at the beginning of dialysis and then tracked with a relative blood volume monitor. The refilling fraction was defined as the ratio of refilling volume to UF volume.

FINDINGS

Ten stable chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients were studied during extended (7 h) nocturnal treatment sessions. Specific UF rate was 4.8 ± 1.8 ml/kg/h. In the 1 h, refilling volume amounted to only 23% of UF volume. Thereafter, refilling fraction steeply increased and reached maximum values in the 2, 3 and 4 h at about mean 90% (91.5%, 88.7%, and 91.1% respectively). From the 5 h on, refilling volume decreased (5 h 81.3%, 6 h 72.5%, 7 h 70.0% of UF volume). Cumulative refilling reached 73.6% of UF volume after 4 h of treatment time. This did not change during the further course of HD. Cumulative refilling volume showed a strong correlation (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) with UF volume. The ratio of blood volume to extracellular volume (R_bex ) was 0.306 ± 0.029 before and slightly but significantly increased to 0.326 ± 0.030 after UF.

DISCUSSION

In spite of low-UF rates and extended treatment times, overall refilling fraction reached only 74% and was not different from the refilling fraction observed in regular HD. This value seems to represent a point where UF-induced volume perturbation is adequately compensated by physiologic control mechanisms.

Impact of dialysate sodium concentration on vascular refilling

BACKGROUND

Although relationship between dialysate sodium concentration and hemodynamic stability has been well studied over the years, outcomes of absolute blood volume (ABV) maintenance and vascular refilling volume (V_ref ) modifications were not included, as its analysis has not been easily accessible to direct investigation. However, recent studies report a simple and feasible methodology to assess ABV and V_ref during hemodialysis (HD) treatments. It is the aim of this study to analyze whether sodium concentration in dialysate modifies ABV drop and V_ref .

METHODS

The study was performed in 19 patients under HD. During three different sessions, sodium concentration in dialysate was randomized to three different profiles: low sodium concentration (LNa, 138 mEq/L), neutral sodium concentration (NNa, 140 mEq/L), and high sodium concentration (HNa, 143 mEq/L). ABV and V_ref were calculated using Kron et al methodology.

RESULTS

Predialysis values of the measured parameters showed similar results for the three profiles. Sodium concentration showed an effect on ABV drop, V_ref, and vascular refilling fraction (F_ref ). Pair-wise comparison revealed mean ABV decreased 0.21 L less when using HNa profile versus LNa profile (p = 0.027), a mean V_ref increase of 0.39 L (p = 0.038), and a mean F_ref increase of 9.94% (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the use of HNa profiles increases V_ref and F_ref and reduces ABV drop during dialysis treatments when compared to LNa profiles.

An improved method to estimate absolute blood volume based on dialysate dilution

Online hemodiafiltration machines equipped with a blood volume monitor and the possibility to rapidly infuse exact amounts of ultrapure dialysate into the extracorporeal circulation can be used to determine absolute blood volume in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of such measurements. Intra-individual reproducibility was evaluated in four measurements taken in hourly intervals within the same dialysis treatment. Ten patients were studied. Absolute blood volumes measured at the beginning and after 1 hour of dialysis were significantly different (80.6 ± 14.5 and 63.9 ± 14.3 mL/kg, P < .001) and highly reproducible between the last three measurements (63.9 ± 14.3, 61.4 ± 13.8, and 60.9 ± 13.9 mL/kg, P = n.s.). Measurement of absolute blood volume after 1 hour of treatment is more precise than earlier measurements and might be better suited for guidance of ultrafiltration.