Misir A, Viechtbauer W, de Vries H, Mesters I. Twelve Month Efficacy of Computer-Tailored Communication in Boosting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Adults Aged Forty and over: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Adv Nutr 2024;
15:100150. [PMID:
37979693 PMCID:
PMC10756964 DOI:
10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100150]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Computer-tailored health communication (CTC) can enhance fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake and, consequently, health by providing personalized feedback. However, few studies have examined the long-term effects of such interventions in middle-aged and older adults. This research aimed to assess the 12-mo efficacy of CTC in promoting F&V consumption and potentially identify who among middle-aged and older adults changed their diet after the intervention. The protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 2021-12-09, code CRD42022330491. The research was performed without external funding. We searched 6 databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CTC interventions for increasing F&V intake with usual care/no intervention control in adults aged ≥40, measured 12 mo after the pretest. The search covered the period from 1 January 1990 to 1 January 2022. We selected 16 RCTs with 25,496 baseline participants for the review systematic literature reviews (SLR) and 11 RCTs with 19 measurements for the meta-analysis (MA). We assessed risk of bias with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. The SLR revealed that at 1-y postCTC intervention, most of the treatment groups increased F&V intake more than the control groups. The overall bias in the data set was not high. The MA model on 11 RCTs revealed a significant effect size for F&V consumption in intervention groups compared with control, standardized mean difference of 0.21 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.12, 0.30), P = 0.0004. The evidence suggests that CTC is a suitable strategy for public interventions aiming to increase F&V intake in adults aged ≥40. The design of CTC for public interventions should consider the process of change and stages of change addressing awareness, attitudes, self-efficacy, and social influence as promising concepts for influencing behavior change.
Collapse