Effectiveness of Reducing Craving in Alcohol Use Disorder Using a Serious Game (SALIENCE): Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has become a major global health problem. Therapy for this condition is still a great challenge. Recently, it has become increasingly evident that computer-based training is a valuable addition to the treatment of addictive disorders.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the web-based serious game SALIENCE (Stop Alcohol in Everyday Life-New Choices and Evaluations) as an add-on therapy for AUD. It combines the cue-exposure therapy approach with elements of decision-making training, enhanced by interactive panoramic images. The effects of SALIENCE training on levels of craving, attention, and cognitive bias are investigated.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial, 62 participants with AUD undergoing 3 weeks of an extended alcohol detoxification program were randomly allocated to an intervention and a control group. A total of 49 individuals (mean age 44.04 y; 17/49, 35% female) completed all sessions and were included in the analysis. Only pretreatment data were available from the other 13 patients. Participants answered questionnaires related to alcohol consumption and craving and completed neuropsychological tasks at the beginning of the study and 2 weeks later to evaluate levels of attention and cognitive biases. During the 2-week period, 27 of the participants additionally performed the SALIENCE training for 30 minutes 3 times a week, for a total of 6 sessions.

RESULTS

We observed a significant decrease in craving in both groups: the control group (mean 15.59, SD 8.02 on the first examination day vs mean 13.18, SD 8.38 on the second examination day) and the intervention group (mean 15.19, SD 6.71 on the first examination day vs mean 13.30, SD 8.47 on the second examination day; F1,47=4.31; P=.04), whereas the interaction effect was not statistically significant (F1,47=0.06; P=.80). Results of the multiple linear regression controlling for individual differences between participants indicated a significantly greater decrease in craving (β=4.12; t36=2.34; P=.03) with the SALIENCE intervention. Participants with lower drinking in negative situations reduced their craving (β=.38; t36=3.01; P=.005) more than people with higher drinking in negative situations.

CONCLUSIONS

The general effectiveness of SALIENCE training as an add-on therapy in reducing alcohol craving was not confirmed. Nevertheless, taking into account individual differences (gender, duration of dependence, stress, anxiety, and drinking behavior in different situations), it was shown that SALIENCE training resulted in a larger reduction in craving than without. Notably, individuals who rarely consume alcohol due to negative affect profited the most from SALIENCE training. In addition to the beneficial effect of SALIENCE training, these findings highlight the relevance of individualized therapy for AUD, adapted to personal circumstances such as drinking motivation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03765476; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03765476.

Does selective inhibition training reduce relapse rates when added to standard treatment of alcohol use disorder? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Alcohol-dependent individuals tend to selectively approach alcohol cues in the environment, demonstrating an alcohol approach bias. Because approach bias modification (ApBM) training can reduce the approach bias and decrease relapse rates in alcohol-dependent patients when added to abstinence-focused treatment, it has become a part of regular treatment. Moreover, in selective inhibition (SI) training, responses to one category of stimuli (i.e., alcohol stimuli) are selectively inhibited in an adapted Go/No-Go task. SI-Training has been found to effectively devalue the inhibited category and to reduce consumption of alcohol among social drinkers. This study investigated whether SI-Training can further improve the effects of treatment as usual that includes ApBM, and if so, whether the effect is mediated by a devaluation of the inhibited alcohol stimuli.

METHODS

Abstinent alcohol-dependent inpatients (N=434) were randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions of either active (n = 214, 32% female) or sham (n = 220, 38% female) SI-Training, in addition to standard treatment that includes active ApBM. Ratings were used to assess changes in the evaluation of alcohol stimuli after the training. Relapse rates were assessed 3 and 12 months after treatment discharge.

RESULTS

Alcohol stimuli were rated negatively before and after the training, and the training did not influence these ratings. Evaluation of nonalcoholic drinks became more positive after active SI-Training. Both ApBM and SI-Training showed the expected training effects on reaction times. Contrary to expectations, SI-Training conditions did not yield different abstinence rates 3 or 12 months after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence supporting the hypothesis that SI-Training amplifies the relapse-preventing effect of ApBM. Moreover, alcohol stimuli were rated negatively before and after treatment and were not influenced by SI-Training.