Clinical Outcomes of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in COVID-19 Patients With Pre-existing Cardiac Comorbidities: A Literature Review

The growing research regarding the implementation of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing cardiac comorbidities has become a large topic of discussion since the onset of the pandemic. Previous research primarily associates positive outcomes to the use of these drug classes due to their mechanism of action, which involves the downregulation of angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) pathway, inflammatory mediators, and cytokines. Thus, these medications can convey preventative and protective effects in patients suffering from a SARS-CoV-2 infection. While we explored the studies that supported the positive outcomes of the use of these drugs in the first half of this review, we also expanded on the limitations of these studies in the latter portion. We also further explored the contradictory studies that indicated that using these antihypertensives can paradoxically increase the severity of COVID-19 infection as well. The studies in support of the use of these medications should consider epigenetic variations, ACE2 variants and acknowledge inherent genetic variations in certain ethnic groups as some have a predisposition for a severe COVID-19 infection. Additionally, mortality rates need to be taken into consideration in these studies as they naturally differ throughout the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. While some studies are in support of the use of these antihypertensives despite other studies suggesting otherwise, further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of these antihypertensives and observe whether they are truly beneficial or not in reducing the severity of COVID-19 infections.

Unmasking Renal Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Beyond Lupus Nephritis

A 64-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of hypertension and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was referred to a nephrology clinic due to persistent microscopic hematuria and trace proteinuria. Initial tests showed elevated antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), and anti-Sjögren's syndrome-related antigen A (anti-SSA) levels, while other markers remained within normal limits. Over the course of a year, her urine protein-creatinine ratio increased, prompting a renal biopsy. The biopsy revealed focal crescent formation in some glomeruli and mild segmental mesangial hypercellularity in others. Although the possibility of antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated nephritis with superimposed IgA nephropathy was considered, negative myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3 antibody tests led to a final diagnosis of IgA nephropathy. The patient's treatment included adding prednisone to her existing valsartan prescription for hypertension, which resulted in improved proteinuria. SLE is an autoimmune disease that can cause chronic inflammation and damage to vital organs. Approximately 50% of SLE patients may experience lupus nephritis (LN), underscoring the importance of urinalysis and renal function tests. This case presents a female patient with SLE and IgA nephropathy, a rare association that requires distinction as it affects disease management. IgA nephropathy is the most common cause of idiopathic glomerulonephritis and can lead to end-stage kidney disease in around 40% of cases. A renal biopsy is also crucial for diagnosing IgA nephropathy in patients with or without another autoimmune disease. Focal crescent formation, a histological feature observed in this case, helped exclude several diagnoses, such as lupus nephritis or pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. The primary goal of treating IgA nephropathy is to prevent disease progression. Initial treatment includes controlling blood pressure, reducing proteinuria, and implementing lifestyle modifications. Corticosteroid therapy may be considered if supportive care is insufficient.

Long-term adherence to evidence based secondary prevention therapies after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

After acute myocardial infarction (AMI), treatment with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) is widely recognized as crucial to reduce risk of a subsequent AMI. However, many patients fail to consistently remain on these treatments over time, and long-term adherence has not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the duration of treatment with beta-blockers and ACEI within the 24 months after an AMI.

DESIGN

A retrospective, observational study using medical and pharmacy claims from a large health plan operating in the Northeastern United States.

SUBJECTS

Enrollees with an inpatient claim for AMI who initiated beta-blocker (N = 499) or ACEI (N = 526) therapy.

MEASUREMENT

Time from initiation to discontinuation was measured with pharmacy refill records. Associations between therapy discontinuation and potential predictors were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

ACEI discontinuation rates were high: 7% stopped within 1 month, 22% at 6 months, 32% at 1 year and 50% at 2 years. Overall discontinuation rates for beta-blockers were similar, but predictors of discontinuation differed for the two treatment types. For beta-blockers, the risk of discontinuation was highest among males and those from low-income neighborhoods; patients with comorbid hypertension and peripheral vascular disease were less likely to discontinue therapy. These factors were not associated with ACEI discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Many patients initiating evidence-based secondary prevention therapies after an AMI fail to consistently remain on these treatments. Adherence is a priority area for development of better-quality measures and quality-improvement interventions. Barriers to beta-blocker adherence for low-income populations need particular attention.