Patient perspectives on working with preferences in psychotherapy: A consensual qualitative research study

OBJECTIVE

Assessing and accommodating patient preferences is integral to evidence-based practice. This qualitative study sought to explore patient perspectives and experiences of preference work in psychotherapy.

METHODS

Participants were 13 UK-based patients who had completed up to 24 sessions of a collaborative-integrative psychotherapy. Ten participants identified as female and three as male. Interviews were conducted at endpoint and analyzed using a team-based, consensual qualitative research approach.

RESULTS

Three superordinate domains were developed: Preferences Themselves, Process of Working with Preferences in Psychotherapy, and Effect of Preference Work (or its Absence). Patients typically wanted leadership, challenge, and input from their psychotherapist, and an affirming style. Patients attributed the origin of their preferences to personal history, characteristics, or circumstances; the present psychotherapy; or past episodes of psychotherapy. Some preferences changed over time. Preference work was described as having positive effects on the therapeutic relationship and patients' intrapersonal worlds; however, variantly, non-accommodation of preferences was also experienced as beneficial.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide in-depth answers to a range of novel questions on preference work-potential mechanisms by which preference work impacts outcomes, factors that may facilitate preference work, and origins of preferences-as well as nuancing previously-established quantitative findings. Implications for clinical training and practice are discussed.

Comorbidity as a moderator of the differential efficacy of transdiagnostic behavior therapy and behavioral activation for affective disorders

OBJECTIVE

Transdiagnostic psychotherapies have been proposed as an effective means for addressing the needs of patients with multiple, comorbid disorders. Yet, it remains unknown whether transdiagnostic approaches empirically outperform disorder-specific psychotherapies for patients with comorbid disorders. Thus, this study tested whether comorbidity moderated the efficacy of transdiagnostic behavior therapy (TBT) and behavioral activation (BA) for patients with various affective disorders.

METHODS

Data derived from a randomized controlled trial in which 93 treatment-seeking veterans received 12 sessions of TBT (n = 46) or BA (n = 47). Baseline comorbidity was assessed with a diagnostic interview. Patients rated their symptoms and functioning throughout treatment, and therapists recorded premature treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Multilevel models revealed significant interactive effects on changes in symptoms and functioning, but not on the posttreatment levels of these outcomes; whereas patients with more comorbidity experienced greater reductions in distress and symptom interference in TBT compared to BA, those with one disorder had better outcomes in BA. Similarly, whereas patients with more comorbidity were less likely to prematurely discontinue TBT compared to BA, those with one disorder were less likely to prematurely discontinue BA.

CONCLUSIONS

The results lend empirical support to previously untested hypotheses for potential benefits of transdiagnostic psychotherapies.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01947647.