Copy Number Variants in Four Italian Turkey Breeds

Simple Summary

Hybrid Turkey selection is focusing on meat production traits characterized by high genetic heritability; the strong directional selection is well known to produce a constant loss in genetic diversity. Genetic characterization is one of the essential activities in the management of populations at risk of extinction. In addition, the genetic structure at the population level and the relationships between individuals are nowadays analysable at the genomic level. In this paper, the genome of 4 different Italian turkey breeds included in the Autochthonous Italian Poultry Breeds Register are analysed in order to obtain a genome-wide Copy Number Variant scan to ameliorate the existing knowledge of the genomic structure of Italian local turkey breeds. Differences have been described at genomic level for physiological, reproductive, and behavioral traits. The analyzed breeds are clearly distinguishable at the genomic level, and their relationships are clearly linked to their geographical origin and to the history of the rural structure of their developing regions. Genome information based on Copy Number Variant (CNV) detection has generated important information in this study concerning the uniqueness of the Italian local turkey breeds.

Abstract

Heritage breeds can be considered a genetic reservoir of genetic variability to be conserved and valorized considering their historical, cultural, and adaptive characteristics and possibly for their high potential in commercial hybrid genetic improvement by gene introgression. The aim of the present research is to investigate via Copy Number Variant (CNVs) the genomic makeup of 4 Italian autochthonous turkey breeds (Bronzato Comune—BrCI, 24; Ermellinato di Rovigo—ErRo, 24; Parma e Piacenza—PrPc, 25; Romagnolo—RoMa, 29). CNVs detection was performed using two different software and an interbreed CNVs comparison was carried out. A total of 1077 CNVs were identified in 102 turkeys, summarized into 519 CNV regions (CNVRs), which resulted after merging in 101 and 18 breed and shared regions. Biodiversity was analyzed using the effective information supplied by CNVs analysis, and BrCI and ErRo were characterized by a low mapped CNV number. Differences were described at a genomic level related to physiological, reproductive, and behavioral traits. The comparison with other three Italian turkey breeds (Brianzolo, Colle Euganei, and Nero Italiano) using a CNV data set available in the literature showed high clustering properties at the genomic level, and their relationships are strictly linked to the geographical origin and to the history of the rural structure of their native regions.

Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection

Simple Summary

In this study we investigate the genomic differentiation of traditional Mexican turkey breeds and commercial hybrid strains. The analysis aimed to identify the effects of different types of selection on the birds’ genome structure. Mexican turkeys are characterized by an adaptive selection to their specific original environment; on the other hand, commercial hybrid strains are directionally selected to maximize productive traits and to reduce production costs. The Mexican turkeys were grouped in two geographic subpopulations, while high genomic homogeneity was found in hybrid birds. Traditional breeds and commercial strains are clearly differentiated from a genetic point of view. Inbreeding coefficients were here calculated with different approaches. A clear effect of selection for productive traits was recorded.

Abstract

The Mexican turkey population is considered to be the descendant of the original domesticated wild turkey and it is distinct from hybrid strains obtained by the intense artificial selection activity that has occurred during the last 40 years. In this study 30 Mexican turkeys were genomically compared to 38 commercial hybrids using 327,342 SNP markers in order to elucidate the differences in genome variability resulting from different types of selection, i.e., only adaptive for Mexican turkey, and strongly directional for hybrids. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) were detected and the two inbreeding coefficients (F and F_ROH) based on genomic information were calculated. Principal component and admixture analyses revealed two different clusters for Mexican turkeys (MEX_cl_1 and MEX_cl_2) showing genetic differentiation from hybrids (HYB) (F_ST equal 0.168 and 0.167, respectively). A total of 3602 ROH were found in the genome of the all turkeys populations. ROH resulted mainly short in length and the ROH_island identified in HYB (n = 9), MEX_cl_1 (n = 1), and MEX_cl_2 (n = 2) include annotated genes related to production traits: abdominal fat (percentage and weight) and egg characteristics (egg shell color and yolk weight). F and F_ROH resulted correlated to each other only for Mexican populations. Mexican turkey genomic variability allows us to separate the birds into two subgroups according to the geographical origin of samples, while the genomic homogeneity of hybrid birds reflected the strong directional selection occurring in this population.