Biological variation of plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3, Serum vitamin B12, folate and ferritin in Turkish healthy subject

Biological variation (BV) plays a crucial role in determining analytical performance specifications, assessing serial measurements of individuals, and establishing the use of population-based reference intervals. Our study aimed to calculate the BV and BV-based quality goals of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH D3), ferritin, folate and vitamin B12 tests. We included a total of 22 apparently healthy volunteers (9 women and 13 men) aged 18-55 years in the study that we conducted in Turkey. Blood samples were collected from the participants once a week for five weeks. Serum ferritin, folate and vitamin B12 levels were measured using immunochemical method, while plasma 25-OH D3 levels were determined using the high-performance liquid chromatography method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate analytical variation(CVA), within-subject BV(CVI) and between-subject BV(CVG). The individuality index (II) and reference change value (RCV) were calculated based on these data. The CVI of 25-OH D3, ferritin, folate, and vitamin B12 were found to be 1.8% (0.6%-2.5%), 16.9% (14.4%-20.2%), 10.7% (9.2%-12.7%), and 8.6% (6.8%-10.5%), respectively. CVG were 44.2% (34.3%-69.9%), 132% (87.7%-238%), 19.4% (14.4%-28.8%), and 39.6% (29.8%-59.0%) for the same biomarkers, while CVA were 3.2% (2.81%-3.71%), 3.5% (3.1%-4.1%), 4.0% (3.5%-4.6%), and 7.5% (6.6%-8.6%), respectively. The II values for 25-OH D3, ferritin, folate, and vitamin B12 were calculated as 0.04, 0.13, 0.55, and 0.22, respectively. The RCV were 10.2%, 47.8%, 31.7%, and 31.6%, respectively. Because the tests analyzed in this study exhibit high individuality, RCV should be preferred rather than population-based reference ranges in clinical interpretation of results.

Short-term biological variation of differential count in healthy subjects in a South Asian population

Estimates of Within-Subject and between subject biological variation for the white blood cell differential count (DC) have not been reported in South Asia. Therefore, we attempted to measure the short-term biological variation estimates for DC. The study was conducted on 28 healthy volunteers (15 males and 13 females). Blood from the volunteers was collected in the morning in K3-EDTA vials and analyzed in triplicate on the Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer, for six consecutive days. The Within subject, between subject and analytical coefficient of variation of the DC was calculated from the results by nested repeated measures ANOVA after outlier exclusion. The Reference change values (RCV) were also calculated. The within-subject variation for eosinophil Count and between subject variation for basophils in our study from South Asia was greater than the published European and American studies. Males and females showed similar biological variation for DC. The within-subject variation of other parameters (Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes and Basophils) were similar or showed only mild differences to the published studies. The markedly different within-subject variation for Eosinophil counts suggest that the RCV for DC in South Asians need to be different from the published data in order to have clinical relevance. The Within-subject variation values of the other parameters seem transportable from the published European and American studies, but the small differences found mean that further regional estimates need to be reported for robust evidence of the same.

Evaluation of biological variation of glycated hemoglobin and glycated albumin in healthy Chinese subjects

Background

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated serum albumin (GSA) are used to evaluate the mean blood glucose levels. To ensure safe clinical application of HbA1c and GSA, reliable biological variation (BV) data are required. The aim of this research was to define the BV of HbA1c and GSA employing stringent rules.

Methods

Blood samples were drawn from 19 healthy subjects (10 females, nine males) once per week for 5 weeks. All samples were analyzed using enzymatic method for GSA and HPLC for HbA1c. The data were assessed for outliers, normality and variance homogeneity, and coefficient of variation (by ANOVA) for BV. Sex‐stratified BV including within‐subject (CV_I) and between‐subject (CV_G) was defined for HbA1c and GSA.

Results

The following estimates for BV values for CV_I and CV_G, respectively, were GSA: 1.23% and 4.67%, Alb: 0.75% and 3.18%, and HbA1c: 0.12% and 2.91%. The RCV of GSA was 3.61%, and HbA1c was 1.41%. And the II was 0.26 for GSA, and 0.07 for HbA1c, both of them less than 0.6. According to the 95% CI, the CV_I of HbA1c was statistically different between females and males. And both the CV_G of HbA1c and GSA were statistically different between females and males.

Conclusion

All CV_I and CV_G estimates were lower than those reported in the online BV database. And there is a significant difference between males and females. Analytical performance specifications derived from BV of this research can be applied internationally.

Analytical and between-subject variation of thrombin generation measured by calibrated automated thrombography on plasma samples

BACKGROUND

The Calibrated Automated Thrombography (CAT) is an in vitro thrombin generation (TG) assay that holds promise as a valuable tool within clinical diagnostics. However, the technique has a considerable analytical variation, and we therefore, investigated the analytical and between-subject variation of CAT systematically. Moreover, we assess the application of an internal standard for normalization to diminish variation.

METHODS

20 healthy volunteers donated one blood sample which was subsequently centrifuged, aliquoted and stored at -80 °C prior to analysis. The analytical variation was determined on eight runs, where plasma from the same seven volunteers was processed in triplicates, and for the between-subject variation, TG analysis was performed on plasma from all 20 volunteers. The trigger reagents used for the TG assays included both PPP reagent containing 5 pM tissue factor (TF) and PPPlow with 1 pM TF. Plasma, drawn from a single donor, was applied to all plates as an internal standard for each TG analysis, which subsequently was used for normalization.

RESULTS

The total analytical variation for TG analysis performed with PPPlow reagent is 3-14% and 9-13% for PPP reagent. This variation can be minimally reduced by using an internal standard but mainly for ETP (endogenous thrombin potential). The between-subject variation is higher when using PPPlow than PPP and this variation is considerable higher than the analytical variation.

CONCLUSION

TG has a rather high inherent analytical variation but considerable lower than the between-subject variation when using PPPlow as reagent.