1
|
Milton A, Ozols A M I, Cassidy T, Jordan D, Brown E, Arnautovska U, Cook J, Phung D, Lloyd-Evans B, Johnson S, Hickie I, Glozier N. Co-Production of a Flexibly Delivered Relapse Prevention Tool to Support the Self-Management of Long-Term Mental Health Conditions: Co-Design and User Testing Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e49110. [PMID: 38393768 PMCID: PMC10926903 DOI: 10.2196/49110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supported self-management interventions, which assist individuals in actively understanding and managing their own health conditions, have a robust evidence base for chronic physical illnesses, such as diabetes, but have been underused for long-term mental health conditions. OBJECTIVE This study aims to co-design and user test a mental health supported self-management intervention, My Personal Recovery Plan (MyPREP), that could be flexibly delivered via digital and traditional paper-based mediums. METHODS This study adopted a participatory design, user testing, and rapid prototyping methodologies, guided by 2 frameworks: the 2021 Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions and an Australian co-production framework. Participants were aged ≥18 years, self-identified as having a lived experience of using mental health services or working in a peer support role, and possessed English proficiency. The co-design and user testing processes involved a first round with 6 participants, focusing on adapting a self-management resource used in a large-scale randomized controlled trial in the United Kingdom, followed by a second round with 4 new participants for user testing the co-designed digital version. A final round for gathering qualitative feedback from 6 peer support workers was conducted. Data analysis involved transcription, coding, and thematic interpretation as well as the calculation of usability scores using the System Usability Scale. RESULTS The key themes identified during the co-design and user testing sessions were related to (1) the need for self-management tools to be flexible and well-integrated into mental health services, (2) the importance of language and how language preferences vary among individuals, (3) the need for self-management interventions to have the option of being supported when delivered in services, and (4) the potential of digitization to allow for a greater customization of self-management tools and the development of features based on individuals' unique preferences and needs. The MyPREP paper version received a total usability score of 71, indicating C+ or good usability, whereas the digital version received a total usability score of 85.63, indicating A or excellent usability. CONCLUSIONS There are international calls for mental health services to promote a culture of self-management, with supported self-management interventions being routinely offered. The resulting co-designed prototype of the Australian version of the self-management intervention MyPREP provides an avenue for supporting self-management in practice in a flexible manner. Involving end users, such as consumers and peer workers, from the beginning is vital to address their need for personalized and customized interventions and their choice in how interventions are delivered. Further implementation-effectiveness piloting of MyPREP in real-world mental health service settings is a critical next step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Milton
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ingrid Ozols A M
- mentalhealth@work (mh@work), Melbourne, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tayla Cassidy
- One Door Mental Health, Sydney, Australia
- School of Social Work and Arts, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Dana Jordan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Ellie Brown
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Urska Arnautovska
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Jim Cook
- TechLab ICT, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Darren Phung
- TechLab ICT, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Hickie
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Nick Glozier
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilchrist G, Dheensa S, Johnson A, Henderson J, Radcliffe P, Dwyer G, Turner R, Thomson K, Papastavrou Brooks C, Love B, Zenasni Z, Berbary C, Carter B, Parrott S, Li J, Easton C, Bergman C, Feder G, Gilchrist E. Adapting the ADVANCE group program for digitally-supported delivery to reduce intimate partner violence by men in substance use treatment: a feasibility study. Front Psychiatry 2024; 14:1253126. [PMID: 38328518 PMCID: PMC10847362 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1253126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 restrictions created barriers to "business as usual" in healthcare but also opened the door to innovation driven by necessity. This manuscript (1) describes how ADVANCE, an in-person group perpetrator program to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) against female (ex)partners by men in substance use treatment, was adapted for digitally-supported delivery (ADVANCE-D), and (2) explores the feasibility and acceptability of delivering ADVANCE-D to men receiving substance use treatment. Methods Firstly, the person-based approach and mHealth development framework were used to iteratively adapt ADVANCE for digitally-supported delivery including conceptualization, formative research, and pre-testing. Then, a non-randomized feasibility study was conducted to assess male participants' eligibility, recruitment, and attendance rates and uptake of support offered to their (ex)partners. Exploratory analyses on reductions in IPV perpetration (assessed using the Abusive Behavior Inventory; ABI) and victimization (using the revised ABI; ABI-R) at the end of the program were performed. Longitudinal qualitative interviews with participants, their (ex)partners, and staff provided an understanding of the program's implementation, acceptability, and outcomes. Results The adapted ADVANCE-D program includes one goal-setting session, seven online groups, 12 self-directed website sessions, and 12 coaching calls. ADVANCE-D includes enhanced risk management and support for (ex)partners. Forty-five participants who had perpetrated IPV in the past 12 months were recruited, forty of whom were offered ADVANCE-D, attending 11.4 (SD 9.1) sessions on average. Twenty-one (ex)partners were recruited, 13 of whom accepted specialist support. Reductions in some IPV perpetration and victimization outcome measures were reported by the 25 participants and 11 (ex)partners interviewed pre and post-program, respectively. Twenty-two participants, 11 (ex)partners, 12 facilitators, and 7 integrated support service workers were interviewed at least once about their experiences of participation. Overall, the program content was well-received. Some participants and facilitators believed digital sessions offered increased accessibility. Conclusion The digitally-supported delivery of ADVANCE-D was feasible and acceptable. Remote delivery has applicability post-pandemic, providing greater flexibility and access. Given the small sample size and study design, we do not know if reductions in IPV were due to ADVANCE-D, time, participant factors, or chance. More research is needed before conclusions can be made about the efficacy of ADVANCE-D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail Gilchrist
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandi Dheensa
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Johnson
- School of Health in Social Science, Department of Clinical Psychology, Center for Psychological Therapies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Juliet Henderson
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Polly Radcliffe
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Georges Dwyer
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Turner
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Thomson
- School of Health in Social Science, Department of Clinical Psychology, Center for Psychological Therapies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Cat Papastavrou Brooks
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Beverly Love
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zohra Zenasni
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cassandra Berbary
- College of Health Sciences and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Ben Carter
- National Addiction Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Easton
- College of Health Sciences and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States
| | | | - Gene Feder
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Gilchrist
- School of Health in Social Science, Department of Clinical Psychology, Center for Psychological Therapies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Austin SF, Frøsig A, Buus N, Lincoln T, von Malachowski A, Schlier B, Frost M, Simonsen E. Service User Experiences of Integrating a Mobile Solution (IMPACHS) Into Clinical Treatment for Psychosis. Qual Health Res 2021; 31:942-954. [PMID: 33491577 DOI: 10.1177/1049732320986556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Innovative technological solutions are increasingly being introduced into psychotherapy. Understanding service user perspectives is a key aspect in adapting this technology to treatment. This study investigated service users' personal experience of the utility, challenges, and rewards of using an mHealth solution in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp). People participating in an early intervention program for psychosis (n = 16) utilized the mHealth solution for up to 6 months. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to capture participant experiences, and quantitative data were collected on psychopathology, usage, and quality of the solution. The solution was widely accepted and utilized in treatment. Four dominant themes were constructed from the interviews: (a) Accessibility and supporting recall, (b) Promotion of dialogue with the therapist, (c) Encouraging reflection, and (d) Factors that affected engagement with the solution. The mHealth solution was perceived as facilitating psychotherapeutic processes and supported underlying CBTp treatment principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Frøsig
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Niels Buus
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Mads Frost
- IT University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Erik Simonsen
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|