Does the use of intraoperative frozen section of bone marrow from the cut end of the mandible help assess the adequacy of bone margins following mandibulectomy for oral cancer?

BACKGROUND

The adequacy of the cut end of the mandible following a segmental mandibulectomy done for oral cancer intraoperatively is at times assessed using a frozen section (FS) of the bone marrow (BM) at the cut ends. The study aimed to assess its utility to guide the intraoperative decision on the adequacy of bony margins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who underwent segmental mandibulectomy from January 2012 to December 2021 at our institute and for whom intraoperative FS of BM was utilized were included. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of this in predicting positive bone margins.

RESULTS

A total of 457 patients were included in the study. The majority of the cases were per premium cases (n = 372, 81.4%). The median age of the cohort was 52 years (range: 22-80 years). Most patients had T4 disease (n = 406, 88.8%). On FS, BM was positive in only 18 patients (3.9%) for whom the bone margin was revised. BM biopsy report in the final histopathology was positive in 12 patients (2.2%). The sensitivity, specificity PPV, and NPV were 52.3%, 98.65%, 64.7%, and 97.7% respectively. No factors predicting BM positivity on FS could be identified in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The BM FS was positive in only a small percentage of patients, and it helped in reducing the bone margin positivity rate from 3.9% to 2.2% only. Hence the intraoperative BM FS seems to have limited utility as seen from our study.

Controversial Issues Regarding Positive Bone Margins in Surgery for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study

Obtaining clean margins in patients who undergo surgical treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is recommended. We hypothesize that the rate of recurrence of the infection is not associated with positive margins, even when using a short-term duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment. We conducted a retrospective pilot study of patients who underwent surgery for DFO confirmed by histopathological analysis of the resected bone from August 1, 2020, to December 1, 2020. Bone samples were taken from the proximal margins to be studied by microbiology and histopathology. Twenty-five (89.3%) patients underwent conservative surgery, and 3 (10.7%) patients underwent a minor amputation. After surgery, the antibiotics were stopped in 19 (67.9%) patients and continued in 9 (32.1%) patients for a median period of 4 days. The microbiology of the bone margins was positive in 20 (71.4%) cases, but the histopathology of the bone margins was positive in just 7 (25%) cases. Recurrence of the infection was detected in 3 (10.7%) patients. Seventeen (68%) patients with microbiological-positive margins did not have a recurrence of infection, while 3 (100%) patients had a recurrence of infection (P = .53). Six (24%) patients among those with histopathological-positive margins did not have a recurrence of infection, and1 (33.3%) patient had a recurrence of infection (P = 1). The recurrence of infection was low and always detected in soft tissues, including the cases with a histopathological-positive bone margin. Postoperative antibiotics were administered for a short period of time and not based on the analysis of bone margins.

Diagnostic value of intraoperative bone marrow assessment for bone margins in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A clear bone margin is essential for complete resection of the bone-involved tumour, but the evaluation of hard tissue takes time and is impractical intraoperatively. Bone marrow assessment remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of intraoperative bone marrow assessment for bone margins. PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies published between 1990 and 2017. A systematic review was conducted. After quality assessment, 10 articles with 11 cohorts and 404 patients were identified. Sensitivity, specificity, and other measures were pooled for meta-analysis; the estimates for intraoperative bone marrow assessment were as follows: sensitivity 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.93), specificity 0.99 (95% CI 0.96-1.00), positive likelihood ratio 109.79 (95% CI 22.99-524.34), negative likelihood ratio 0.18 (95% CI 0.08-0.42), and diagnostic odds ratio 241.82 (95% CI 90.33-647.38). Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity at the summary operating point of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.82 and 0.99, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.99. Intraoperative bone marrow assessment was investigated by meta-analysis and shown to have a high level of overall accuracy for the diagnosis of bone margins.

Evaluation of intraoperative cytological assessment of bone resection margins in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Frozen sections are routinely applied to control for adequate resection margins. In cases in which carcinoma infiltrates bone, the intraoperative microscopic assessment of bone margins remains challenging due to technical difficulties to section native bone. The objective of the current study was to evaluate an intraoperative cytological approach to control bone resection margins in patients with bone-infiltrating oral squamous cell carcinomas.

METHODS

A total of 174 cytological preparations obtained from bone margins of bone-infiltrating oral squamous cell carcinomas (28 patients) were assessed intraoperatively and compared with the corresponding histological findings. In a validation cohort (45 patients) the intraoperative cytological assessment of bone resection margins (ICAB) (104 margins) was evaluated as a diagnostic tool for routine clinical application.

RESULTS

In the first patient cohort, the ICAB revealed 95.3% sensitivity and 96% specificity. The results provided an accuracy of 95.7% with a significant correlation noted between cytological and histological results (κ, 0.91; P < .001), and a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93.8% and 96.9%, respectively. In the validation cohort, ICAB revealed 80% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity with 98% accuracy. There was a significant correlation found between cytological and histological results (κ, 0.91; P < .001), providing a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 80% and 98%, respectively. ICAB could predict final resection status at bone margins with 80% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity. A significant correlation was found between the cytological and histological resection status at bone margins (κ, 0,75; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICAB could supplement intraoperative frozen sections of soft tissue margins as a standard procedure to control for adequate resection at bone margins.