Antibiotic Prescriptions in Critically Ill Patients with Bloodstream Infection Due to ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Compliance with the French Guidelines for the Treatment of Infections with Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae-A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study

National and international guidelines were recently published regarding the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins infections. We aimed to assess the implementation of the French guidelines in critically ill patients suffering from extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infection (ESBL-E BSI). We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in the ICU of three French hospitals. Patients treated between 2018 and 2022 for ESBL-E BSI were included. The primary assessment criterion was the proportion of adequate empirical carbapenem prescriptions, defined as prescriptions consistent with the French guidelines. Among the 185 included patients, 175 received an empirical anti-biotherapy within 24 h of ESBL-E BSI onset, with a carbapenem for 100 of them. The proportion of carbapenem prescriptions consistent with the guidelines was 81%. Inconsistent prescriptions were due to a lack of prescriptions of a carbapenem, while it was recommended in 25% of cases. The only factor independently associated with adequate empirical carbapenem prescription was ESBL-E colonization (OR: 107.921 [9.303-1251.910], p = 0.0002). The initial empirical anti-biotherapy was found to be appropriate in 83/98 patients (85%) receiving anti-biotherapy in line with the guidelines and in 56/77 (73%) patients receiving inadequate anti-biotherapy (p = 0.06). Our results illustrate the willingness of intensivists to spare carbapenems. Promoting implementation of the guidelines could improve the proportion of initial appropriate anti-biotherapy in critically ill patients with ESBL-E BSI.

In vitro efficacy of humanized regimen of flomoxef against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

This study compared the efficacy of flomoxef with other β-lactam antibiotics against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing bacteria of clinical relevance. First, the prevalence and β-lactamase genotypes of ESBL-producing strains among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected in Japan from 2004 to 2018 were investigated. High MIC90 values (>64 µg/mL) of ceftriaxone, cefepime, and ceftazidime and low MIC90 values (≤0.06-2 µg/mL) of flomoxef, cefmetazole, and meropenem against both species were observed. Second, a chemostat model was used to analyze the efficacy of humanized regimens of three oxacephem/cephamycin antibiotics (flomoxef, cefmetazole, cefoxitin) and two other antibiotics (meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam) in suppressing the growth of five ESBL-producing E. coli and two K. pneumoniae strains. Flomoxef, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem showed good bactericidal effects with >4 log10 CFU/mL reduction without bacterial regrowth at 24 h even when the MIC of test isolates was >MIC90. Cefmetazole and cefoxitin resulted in regrowth of test isolates with MIC ≥MIC90 at 24 h. Cefmetazole, cefoxitin, flomoxef, and meropenem showed increased MICs for regrown samples. A clear relationship between the proportion of time that the free drug concentration exceeded the MIC (%fT>MIC) and antibiotic efficacy was found for flomoxef, cefoxitin, and cefmetazole, and flomoxef had the highest %fT>MIC, whereas discrepancies between Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint and bactericidal activity were observed for cefmetazole. Flomoxef was effective in preventing the growth of all ESBL-producing strains, even those with an MIC eight times the MIC90. Thus, flomoxef may be a good alternative to meropenem in context of carbapenems sparing stewardship.

Is Ceftazidime/Avibactam an Option for Serious Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales?: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Carbapenem-sparing regimens are needed for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing members of the Enterobacterales We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenems against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales species. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing ceftazidime/avibactam with carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales was conducted. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ESBL- and AmpC-specific outcome data were compiled. Of the 246 patients infected with an ESBL-producing microorganism in the ceftazidime/avibactam arm, 224 (91%) had a clinical response at test of cure (TOC), versus 240 of 271 (89%) patients in the carbapenem arm (risk ratio [RR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.08; P = 0.45; I ² = 0%). Clinical response rates for AmpC producers in the ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenem arms were 32/40 (80%) and 37/42 (88%), respectively (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P = 0.35; I ² = 0%). Microbiological response and mortality rates were not reported specifically for ESBL/AmpC producers. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be a carbapenem-sparing option for the treatment of mild to moderate complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales species, and the data are too limited to provide any conclusive recommendations for the AmpC producers. Care should be taken before extrapolating this to severe infections, given that the representation of this population in the reviewed studies was negligible. Ceftazidime/avibactam is a costly drug active against carbapenem-resistant microorganisms and should be used judiciously to preserve its activity against them.