U-Shaped Association Between Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio and Risk of Cardiac Conduction Block

Purpose

Inflammation plays a critical role in the development of cardiac conduction block (CCB), which is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) acts as a novel inflammatory marker; however, its association with CCB has not yet been studied. This study aimed to investigate the association between MLR and CCB risk.

Patients and Methods

In total, 82,472 CCB-free participants were identified from the Kailuan study. MLR was calculated using the monocyte count/lymphocyte count. The participants were stratified based on quartiles of MLR levels. Incident CCB and its subtypes were ascertained from electrocardiograms at biennial follow-up visits. The Cox proportional hazards model and restricted cubic spline analysis were used to investigate the association between MLR with CCB and its subtypes.

Results

During a median follow-up of 10.4 years, 3222 incident CCB cases were observed. A U-shaped association was observed between MLR and CCB risk (Pnonlinearity <0.05). After multivariate adjustment, individuals in the highest MLR quartile had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.212 (95% CI: 1.097-1.340; Q4 vs Q2), while those in the lowest MLR quartile had an HR of 1.106 (95% CI: 1.000-1.224; Q1 vs Q2). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses yielded consistent results. The U-shaped association persisted for atrioventricular block (AVB) in subtype analyses.

Conclusion

MLR was significantly associated with an increased risk of new-onset CCB. Assessing MLR may have clinical relevance for predicting CCB risk, providing valuable insights for preventive strategies and patient management.

Pre-Registered Clinical Trial Number

The pre-registered clinical trial number is ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.

Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in aortic valve diseases after TAVI with vitaFlow liberty system

Introduction

Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a known complication in patients with aortic stenosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, there is limited research on TAVI for pure aortic regurgitation (PAR), and more investigation is needed to determine the occurrence of postoperative cardiac conduction block and the need for PPI in this population. Therefore, this retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the incidence of cardiac conduction block and the necessity of PPI after TAVI in patients with different types of aortic valve disease, including pure aortic stenosis (PAS), aortic stenosis with regurgitation (ASR), and PAR.

Methods

Clinical data of 100 patients who TAVI were analyzed retrospectively. The incidence of conduction block was assessed, and clinical factors were examined to predict the necessity of PPI.

Results

Cardiac conduction block was found to be a common complication following TAVI, particularly in patients with PAR. PAR was identified as an independent risk factor for requiring PPI. Additionally, first-degree atrioventricular block emerged as a sensitive predictor for PPI in patients with PAR.

Discussion

These findings provide valuable insights into the safety and effectiveness of TAVI, which can help enhance patient management and reduce complications.