Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury with different injury severity

Spasticity is one of the most common symptoms manifested following spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this study was to assess spasticity in individuals with subacute and chronic SCI with different injury severity, standardizing the time and assessments of spasticity. We tested 110 individuals with SCI classified by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) as either motor complete (AIS A and B; subacute, n = 25; chronic, n = 33) or motor incomplete (AIS C and D; subacute, n = 23; chronic, n = 29) at a similar time after injury (subacute, ∼1 mo after injury during inpatient rehabilitation and chronic, ≥1 yr after injury) using clinical (modified Ashworth scale) and kinematic (pendulum test) outcomes to assess spasticity in the quadriceps femoris muscle. Using both methodologies, we found that among individuals with subacute motor complete injuries, only a minority showed spasticity, whereas the majority exhibited no spasticity. This finding stands in contrast to individuals with subacute motor incomplete injury, where both methodologies revealed that a majority exhibited spasticity, whereas a minority exhibited no spasticity. In chronic injuries, most individuals showed spasticity regardless of injury severity. Notably, when spasticity was present, its magnitude was similar across injury severity in both subacute and chronic injuries. Our results suggest that the prevalence, not the magnitude, of spasticity differs between individuals with motor complete and incomplete SCI in the subacute and chronic stages of the injury. We thus argue that considering the "presence of spasticity" might help the stratification of participants with motor complete injuries for clinical trials.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The prevalence of spasticity in humans with SCI remains poorly understood. Using kinematic and clinical outcomes, we examined spasticity in individuals with subacute and chronic injuries of different severity. We found that spasticity in the quadriceps femoris muscle was more prevalent among individuals with subacute motor incomplete than in those with motor complete injuries. However, in a different group of individuals with chronic injuries, no differences were found in the prevalence of spasticity across injury severity.

Predictors of Response to 4-Aminopyridine in Chronic Canine Spinal Cord Injury

4-Aminopyridine (4AP), a potassium channel antagonist, can improve hindlimb motor function in dogs with chronic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury (SCI); however, individual response is variable. We hypothesized that injury characteristics would differ between dogs that do and do not respond to 4AP. Our objective was to compare clinical, electrodiagnostic, gait, and imaging variables between dogs that do and do not respond to 4AP, to identify predictors of response. Thirty-four dogs with permanent deficits after acute thoracolumbar SCI were enrolled. Spasticity, motor and sensory evoked potentials (MEPs, SEPs), H-reflex, F-waves, gait scores, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) were evaluated at baseline and after 4AP administration. Baseline variables were assessed as predictors of response; response was defined as ≥1 point change in open field gait score. Variables were compared pre- and post-4AP to evaluate 4AP effects. Fifteen of 33 (45%) dogs were responders, 18/33 (55%) were non-responders and 1 was eliminated because of an adverse event. Pre-H-reflex threshold <1.2 mA predicted non-response; pre-H-reflex threshold >1.2 mA and Canine Spasticity Scale overall score <7 were predictive of response. All responders had translesional connections on DTI. MEPs were more common post-4AP than pre-4AP (10 vs. 6 dogs) and 4AP decreased H-reflex threshold and increased spasticity in responders. 4-AP impacts central conduction and motor neuron pool excitability in dogs with chronic SCI. Severity of spasticity and H-reflex threshold might allow prediction of response. Further exploration of electrodiagnostic and imaging characteristics might elucidate additional factors contributing to response or non-response.