Underwater clip closure method for mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)

Conventional clip closure of mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection decreases the incidence of delayed adverse events, but may result in incomplete closure, depending on size or location. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the underwater clip closure method for complete duodenal defect closure without the difficulties associated with conventional closure methods. We investigated 19 patients with 20 lesions who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of the duodenum and subsequent mucosal defect closure in underwater conditions at our facility between February 2021 and January 2022. The success rate of the underwater clip closure method was defined as the complete endoscopic closure of the mucosal defect; a success rate of 100% was achieved. The median resected specimen size was 34.3 mm, the median procedure time for mucosal defect closure was 14 min, and the median number of clips used per patient was 12. No delayed adverse events were observed. The underwater clip closure method is a feasible option for complete closure of mucosal defects, regardless of the size or location of a duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

New Closure Method Using Loop and Open-Close Clips after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Stomach and Colon Lesions

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and en bloc resection of stomach and colon tumors have become common. However, mucosal defects resulting from ESD may cause delayed bleeding and perforation. To prevent adverse events, we developed a new clip closure technique, namely, the loop and open–close clip closure method (LOCCM), and aimed to examine its efficacy after ESD for stomach and colon tumors. The LOCCM uses loop and open–close clips. Here, the open–close clip was used to grasp the loop to bring it to the edge of the post-ESD mucosal defect. Another clip with a loop was then inserted into the opposite edge and clipped to the contralateral mucosa to pull both edges together. Once apposed, additional clips facilitated complete closure. The LOCCM was performed in 19 patients after ESD at Tottori University between October 2020 and March 2021. The outcomes retrospectively analyzed were the LOCCM success and adverse event rates. The complete closure rate using LOCCM was 89.5% and none of the patients had post-ESD bleeding or perforation. The results show that LOCCM is an effective and safe closure technique for mucosal defects after stomach and colon ESD to prevent bleeding and perforation.

Line-assisted complete closure for a large mucosal defect after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection decreased post-electrocoagulation syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The incidence of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome (PECS) can be decreased by closing mucosal defects. However, large mucosal defects after colorectal ESD cannot be closed endoscopically. We established line-assisted complete clip closure (LACC), a novel technique for large mucosal defects after colorectal ESD. We evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of LACC for preventing PECS.

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive patients on whom LACC after colorectal ESD was attempted from January 2016 to August 2016 were analyzed. After exclusion of patients with incomplete LACC and adverse events during ESD, 57 patients comprised the LACC group. In contrast, 495 patients who did not undergo closure of a mucosal defect comprised the control group. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for patients' backgrounds. Treatment outcomes were evaluated between the groups.

RESULTS

Median resected specimen size in the LACC-attempted group was 35 mm (range, 20-72 mm), and LACC success rate was 95% (58/61). Median procedure time of LACC was 14 min. In the LACC group, incidence of PECS was only 2%, and no delayed bleeding or perforation occurred. Propensity score matching created 51 matched pairs. Adjusted comparisons between the LACC and control groups showed a lower incidence of PECS (0% vs 12%, respectively; P = 0.03) and shorter hospitalization (5 vs 6 days, respectively; P < 0.001) in the LACC group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that LACC can effectively reduce the incidence of PECS, although further large-scale studies are warranted.