Comparing surgical and endoscopic resection approaches for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors within the diameter range of 10-20mm: an inverse probability weighting analysis based on the SEER database

Background

Currently, the primary treatment modalities for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (CRNET) with a diameter between 10mm and 20mm are surgical resection (SR) and endoscopic resection (ER). However, it remains unclear which surgical approach yields the greatest survival benefit for patients.

Methods

This study included data from patients diagnosed with CRNET with tumor diameters ranging from 10mm to 20mm between the years 2004 and 2019, obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were categorized into ER and SR groups based on the respective surgical approaches. Inverse probability weighting (IPTW) was employed to mitigate selection bias. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were utilized to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was performed to evaluate potential factors influencing survival.

Results

A total of 292 CRNET patients were included in this study (ER group: 108 individuals, SR group: 184 individuals). Prior to IPTW adjustment, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the OS and CSS of the SR group were inferior to those of the ER group. However, after IPTW adjustment, no statistically significant differences in prognosis were observed between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with muscular invasion, positive lymph nodes, or distant metastasis derived greater survival benefits from SR. Significant differences in OS and CSS between the two groups were also observed across different age groups.

Conclusion

For patients with mucosal-limited lesions and without local lymph node or distant metastasis, ER is the preferred surgical approach. However, for patients with muscular invasion or positive lymph nodes/distant metastasis, SR offers a better prognosis. The choice of surgical approach should be based on the specific clinical characteristics of patients within different subgroups.

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective C-NET STUDY

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased with colorectal cancer screening programs and increased colonoscopies. The management of colorectal NETs has recently shifted from radical surgery to endoscopic resection. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of various methods of endoscopic resection for colorectal NETs.

METHODS

Among those registered in the C-NET STUDY, patients with colorectal NETs who underwent endoscopic treatment as the initial therapy were included. Short-term outcomes, such as the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection (en bloc resection with tumor-free margin) rate, were analyzed based on treatment modalities.

RESULTS

A total of 472 patients with 477 colorectal NETs received endoscopic treatment. Of these, 418 patients with 421 lesions who met the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 55 years, and 56.9% of them were men. The lower rectum was the most commonly affected site (88.6%), and lesions <10 mm accounted for 87% of the cases. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L, 56.5%) was the most common method, followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 31.4%) and endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap (EMR-C, 8.5%). R0 resection rates <10 mm were 95.5%, 94.8%, and 94.3% for ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C, respectively. All 16 (3.8%) patients who developed treatment-related complications could be treated conservatively. Overall, 23 (5.5%) patients had incomplete resection without independent clinicopathological risk factors.

CONCLUSION

ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C were equally effective and safe for colorectal NETs with a diameter <10 mm.

Surgical treatment of extra-appendiceal colorectal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Extra-appendiceal colorectal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms with a variable biological behavior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 15 patients with an extra-appendiceal colorectal neuroendocrine tumor who underwent surgical resection (M/F=3:12, mean age=62.9 years). Lower-grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas were recognized in 5 and 10 patients, respectively. Data were evaluated retrospectively with regard to clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients with lower-grade NETs was significantly lower than that in patients with NECs (53 yr vs. 68 yr, p=0.03). NETs G1-G2 were significantly smaller than neuroendocrine carcinomas (4.0 cm vs. 6.4 cm, p=0.02). There were no differences between lower-grade NETs and NECs with regard to tumor location, rate of nodal involvement and distant metastases. All the patients underwent open segmental resection of the colon or rectum. Complete resection was achieved in 3 of 5 patients from the lower-grade NET group, and in 5 of 10 patients in the NEC group. Overall survival was significantly better for lower-grade NETs tumors (p=0.005). The median survival was 4.8 months in the NEC group. The median survival in the lower-grade NET group was not achieved after a median follow-up of 69 months. Three-year overall survival was 100% for lower-grade NETs, and only 27% for NECs.

CONCLUSION

Lower-grade neuroendocrine tumors seem to exhibit comparable potential for dissemination as neuroendocrine carcinomas, but prognostic implications of metastases are distinct.

Roles of miR-186 and PTTG1 in colorectal neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

This work aims to investigate the expression of miRNA-186 in patients with colorectal cancer tissues, blood and feces and its roles in regulating the infiltration and invasion in colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Totally 39 patients with surgical resection were included from August 2012 to February 2015 in Jilin Province People's Hospital as the Colorectal Neuroendocrine tumor (CNET). Peripheral blood, stool, and resected tumor tissues with adjacent normal of each patient was collected. In the same period, the blood and stool from 25 patients with hemorrhoids or other non-neoplastic diseases were collected and these samples used as clinical control group. MiR-186 expression and PTTG1 (pituitary tumor-transforming 1) expression were detected by quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR). The PTTG1 protein expression in tumor samples were detected by Western Blot, while its expression in blood and stool were detected by Elisa.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the expression of PTTG1 mRNA and protein was significantly up-regulated in tumor samples, blood, and stool of patients with CNET, while the expression of miR-186 was down-regulated (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PTTG1 expression was significantly up-regulated in patients with CNET, which was induced by the down-regulated miR-186. MiR-186 may participate in the regulation of infiltration and invasion in CNET patients through targeting PTTG1 expression.