Towards Co-Design in Delivering Assistive Technology Interventions: Reconsidering Roles for Consumers, Allied Health Practitioners, and the Support Workforce

A complexity of factors, from health and technology innovations to policy redesign to achieve consumer-directed care, are impacting traditional roles for Australian allied health practitioners (AHPs). This pilot study considers roles for AHPs in relation to assistive technology (AT) interventions. Articulating 'who does what' may serve a number of purposes including de-professionalization of the discourse; better utilization of support networks and workforces; and alignment with contemporary policy. Yet, a suitable framework to assist with collaborative AT implementation between relevant stakeholders was not identified within the existing literature. This research aimed to develop and pilot an AT collaboration tool which enables AHPs, consumers, their support networks and the support workforce, to navigate policy redesign toward ethical consumer-directed implementation of AT interventions. An AT collaboration tool was developed based upon practice-based knowledge, relevant regulatory and practice evidence and identifies relevant stakeholders, AT service steps and roles, and quality indicators to support competent practice. The tool was piloted in four separate and diverse practice analyses of AT interventions (custom prosthetics, home enteral nutrition, communication devices, and vehicle modifications) considering four allied health professions (prosthetics and orthotics, dietetics, speech pathology, occupational therapy). Pilot testing of the tool supports the feasibility of re-framing AT provision using competency-based and risk-informed approaches and enabling more inclusive roles for consumers and the support workforce. Further testing of the tool is indicated, followed by strategic actions for uptake by individuals, professions and policymakers. The AT collaboration tool has potential to enable AHPs to fulfil ethical obligations for consumer-centered practice, and to facilitate consumer choice, both in Australia and internationally.

Introducing consumer directed care in residential care settings for older people in Australia: views of a citizens' jury

Objectives Health services worldwide are increasingly adopting consumer directed care approaches. Traditionally, consumer directed care models have been implemented in home care services and there is little guidance as to how to implement them in residential care. This study used a citizens' jury to elicit views of members of the public regarding consumer directed care in residential care. Methods A citizens' jury involving 12 members of the public was held over two days in July 2016, exploring the question: For people with dementia living in residential care facilities, how do we enable increased personal decision making to ensure that care is based on their needs and preferences? Jury members were recruited through a market research company and selected to be broadly representative of the general public. Results The jury believed that person-centred care should be the foundation of care for all older people. They recommended that each person's funding be split between core services (to ensure basic health, nutrition and hygiene needs are met) and discretionary services. Systems needed to be put into place to enable the transition to consumer directed care including care coordinators to assist in eliciting resident preferences, supports for proxy decision makers, and accreditation processes and risk management strategies to ensure that residents with significant cognitive impairment are not taken advantage of by goods and service providers. Transparency should be increased (perhaps using technologies) so that both the resident and nominated family members can be sure that the person is receiving what they have paid for. Conclusions The views of the jury (as representatives of the public) were that people in residential care should have more say regarding the way in which their care is provided and that a model of consumer directed care should be introduced. Policy makers should consider implementation of consumer directed care models that are economically viable and are associated with high levels of satisfaction among users.

Impact of consumer-directed care on quality of life in the community aged care sector

AIM

All consumer-directed care (CDC) models aim to transfer "choice" and "control" over the allocated funds from the aged care provider to service recipients. This study presents an empirical assessment of the relationships between quality of life for older adults aged ≥65 years receiving community aged care services in Australia under CDC compared with those receiving traditional provider-directed care (PDC).

METHODS

Self-reported quality of life (health status and capabilities) were measured for older adults receiving community aged care services (n = 139) using the EuroQoL five dimensions five-level version and the older people-specific capability index (ICECAP-O) instruments. The relationship between quality of life, mode of service delivery, and other sociodemographic characteristics were examined using descriptive statistical and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

The quality of life of individuals receiving CDC and PDC was similar (ICECAP-O: CDC mean 0.74 [SD 0.17], PDC mean 0.78 [SD 0.17]. EuroQoL five dimensions five-level version: CDC mean 0.46 [SD 0.33], PDC mean 0.49 [SD0.27]). In general, individuals in receipt of CDC reported higher levels of capability in the control and independence dimension for the ICECAP-O relative to those receiving PDC. Multivariate regression analysis showed that living alone was associated with higher quality of life (P = 0.01) and higher levels of capability (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although no discernible differences in overall quality of life were found, higher levels of self-reported control and independence for those in receipt of CDC suggest that the main policy objectives of transferring "choice" and "control" away from the aged care provider and to the individual are being met. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1399-1405.