1
|
Kahnert K, Fischer C, Alter P, Trudzinski F, Welte T, Behr J, Herth F, Kauczor HU, Bals R, Watz H, Rabe K, Söhler S, Kokot I, Vogelmeier C, Jörres R. [What have we learned from the German COPD cohort COSYCONET and where do we go from here?]. Pneumologie 2022; 77:81-93. [PMID: 36526266 PMCID: PMC9931494 DOI: 10.1055/a-1966-0848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
COSYCONET 1 is the only German COPD cohort which is large enough to be internationally comparable. The recruitment, which started in 2010 and ended in December 2013, comprised 2741 patients with the diagnosis of COPD who were subsequently investigated in regular follow-up visits. All visits included a comprehensive functional and clinical characterisation. On the basis of this detailed data set, it was possible to address a large number of clinical questions. These questions ranged from the prescription of medication, the detailed analysis of comorbidities, in particular cardiovascular disease, and biomarker assessment to radiological and health-economic aspects. Currently, more than 60 publications of COSYCONET data are internationally available. The present overview provides a description of all the results that were obtained, focussing on the relationship between different clinical and functional aspects as well as their potential practical consequences. In addition, information on the follow-up study COSYCONET 2 is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Kahnert
- 27192Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Klinikum der Universitat München LMU, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), München, Deutschland,Korrespondenzadresse PD Dr. med. Kathrin Kahnert Klinikum der Universität München LMU, Medizinische Klinik VZiemssenstr. 180336 MünchenDeutschland
| | - Carolina Fischer
- 27192Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Peter Alter
- 9377Klinik für Pneumologie, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Franziska Trudzinski
- 14996Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg gGmbH, Translational Lung
Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung
Research, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Tobias Welte
- 9177Klinik für Pneumologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen Behr
- 27192Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Klinikum der Universitat München LMU, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), München, Deutschland
| | - Felix Herth
- 14996Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg gGmbH, Translational Lung
Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung
Research, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- 27178Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Robert Bals
- 39072Innere Medizin V – Pulmonologie, Allergologie, Beatmungs-und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Associated member of the Germen Center of Lung Research (DZL), Homburg, Deutschland,9377Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Saarland University Campus, Saarbrücken, Deutschland
| | - Henrik Watz
- 9213Pulmonary Research Institute, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Rabe
- 9213Pulmonary Research Institute, LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Deutschland,98594Medizinische Fakultät, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Sandra Söhler
- 9377Klinik für Pneumologie, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Inge Kokot
- 9377Klinik für Pneumologie, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Claus Vogelmeier
- 9377Klinik für Pneumologie, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Jörres
- 27192Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calzetta L, Ritondo BL, Matera MG, Pezzuto G, Cazzola M, Rogliani P. Investigational treatments in phase I and II clinical trials: a systematic review in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2020; 29:723-738. [PMID: 32401655 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1769064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. The current pharmacological treatments for the management of stable COPD permit the reduction of symptoms and frequency and severity of exacerbations, and the improvement of exercise tolerance and health status. However, they do not modify the long-term decline in lung function and patient health. Consequently, there is the strong need for 'highly innovative' medications that are focused on new targets and/or mechanisms for the treatment of COPD. Areas covered. This systematic review assesses investigational agents in Phase I and II clinical trials over the last six years. It offers insights on whether drugs and/or formulations in clinical development offer future effective treatments of COPD. Expert opinion. There is no evidence to suggest that current investigational agents can reduce lung function decline and cure COPD. However, looking forward, investigational, innovative treatments in combination with the therapies already recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) may provide future suitable tools to counteract the progression of COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigino Calzetta
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" , Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Ludovica Ritondo
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" , Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Gabriella Matera
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli , Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pezzuto
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital "Tor Vergata" , Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Cazzola
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" , Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE COPD remains under-recognized and under-treated. Much of early COPD care is given by primary care physicians but only when COPD is recognized. This survey explores the attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge related to COPD recognition, diagnosis, and treatment from family physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) working in primary care. METHODS We completed a survey of family physicians, and NPs/PAs attending one of three CME programs on five common chronic conditions including COPD. RESULTS Return rate was 62% (n = 284) including 178 physicians and 100 NPs/PAs. Fewer than half of the respondents reported knowledge of or use of COPD guidelines. The barriers to recognition and diagnosis of COPD they reported included the multiple morbidities of most COPD patients, failure of patients to report COPD symptoms, as well as lack of knowledge and inadequate training in COPD diagnosis and management. Three quarters (74%) of respondents reported use of spirometry to diagnose COPD but only 32% said they included reversibility assessment. COPD was incorrectly assessed as a disease primarily of men (78% ofrespondents) that appeared after age 60 (61%). Few respondents reported that they believed COPD treatment was useful or very useful for improving symptoms (15%) or decreasing exacerbations (3%) or that pulmonary rehabilitation was helpful (3%), but 13% reported they thought COPD treatment could extend longevity. CONCLUSIONS Primary care physicians and NPs/PAs working in primary care continue to report lack of awareness and use of COPD guidelines, as well as correct information related to COPD epidemiology or potential benefits of available treatments including pulmonary rehabilitation. It is unlikely that diagnosis and management of COPD will improve in primary care until these knowledge gaps and discrepancies with published efficacy of therapy issues are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara P Yawn
- Olmsted Medical Center, Research Department, Rochester, MN 55904, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|