Interstitial pregnancy management: A multicentric analysis of 98 patients from the FRANCOGENT group comparing surgery and medical treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes associated with each therapeutic option for patients diagnosed with interstitial pregnancy (IP).

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric retrospective cohort study within the departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics involved in the Francogent research group. Women treated for an interstitial pregnancy between January 2008 to December 2019 were included. Three therapeutic options were evaluated: surgical treatment (ST); in situ methotrexate combined with systemic methotrexate (IS-MTX); and systemic methotrexate (IM-MTX). Success of first-line treatment was defined by hCG negativation (<5I U/L). Secondary outcomes included the need for secondary surgical procedure, secondary medical treatment, emergency surgery, postoperative complications, duration of hospitalization, and delay before hCG negativation.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were managed for IP: 42 (42.9%) patients had IM-MTX; 34 (34.7%) had IS-MTX; and 22 (22.4%) had ST. First-line treatment was successful in all patients of the ST group (22/22, 100%), in 31% of patients within the IM-MTX group (13/42) and 70.6% (24/34) in the IS-MTX group. The sole parameter associated with the risk of treatment failure was the mode of methotrexate administration. The size of the gestational sac or the presence of fetal heartbeat was not associated with decreased medical treatment (IS or IM-MTX) efficiency.

CONCLUSION

Either ST or IS-MTX are good options for IP treatment associated with high success rates. A single-dose regimen of IM-MTX is less efficient than IS-MTX or ST. Symptomatic patients with severity criteria should always undergo emergency surgery. IP remains a high-risk condition that should be managed, whenever possible, in referral centers to potentialize the chances of favorable outcomes.

Clinical and histopathological correlations in symptomatic patients with salpingectomy for Essure® implant removal: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Many concerns have been raised about adverse effects related to Essure® device. Several pathophysiological hypotheses have been proposed including allergic reactions, Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, galvanic corrosion with release of heavy metals and inflammation. In the present study, we aimed to focus on inflammation process by performing a histopathological evaluation of Fallopian tubes in symptomatic patients with Essure® removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study with identification of the type of inflammatory response and characterisation of inflammatory cells in the surrounding tubal tissue around the Essure® (STTE) and at distance from the implant. Histopathological and clinical correlations were also investigated.

RESULTS

In the STTE from 47 cases, acute inflammation was observed in 3/47 (6.4%) cases. Chronic inflammation with lymphocytes (42.5%, 20/47) was associated with a significant higher pre-operative pain score (p = .03). Fibrosis was noted in 43/47 (91.5%) cases. Fibrosis without lymphocytes (51.1%, 24/47) was statistically associated with significant reduced pain (p = .04). At distance from the Essure® implant, only chronic inflammation with lymphocytes was present in 10/47 (21.7%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation response do not seem to be enough to explain all the Essure-related adverse outcomes, suggesting the involvement of other biological mechanisms.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03281564.

Clinical improvement after Essure® devices removal: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Essure® implant is a permanently implanted minimally invasive birth control device for women (female sterilisation) widely used between 2002 and 2018. Many adverse events were reported by patients. Increasingly removal procedures have been performed in symptomatic patients. However, there is a lack of in-depth studies on clinical improvement after Essure® removal. We aimed to review all clinical studies about symptoms and quality of life (QoL) after removal procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of literature in electronic search in Medline and Embase databases from January 2002 to January 2022 using the following keywords: Essure; Essure removal; quality of life; symptomatology improvement.

RESULTS

Out of 764 articles in the initial database, 18 clinical studies were eligible for inclusion in our literature review. Overall clinical improvement rates after removal ranged from 21% to 98%. All symptoms were less frequent after Essure® removal, although with large discrepancies between studies. Lack of improvement was reported between 1% to 15% of patients. Rate of patients with improvement of QoL after removal ranged from 58 to 98%. The pain was reported as significantly reduced after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the available literature, Essure® removal in symptomatic patients may improve symptoms and quality of life. This should be discussed in the benefits and risks ratio before deciding on the best option of management.

Surgical techniques for the removal of Essure® microinserts: a literature review on current practice

PURPOSE

To evaluate the different techniques for Essure^® microinserts removal and to assess the risk of fracture of the device and the intra- and post-operative complications in relation to surgical technique variants.

METHODS

Electronic search in Medline, Scopus and Embase databases using the following keywords: Essure; Essure removal; Essure surgical technique.

RESULTS

Out of 95 articles in the initial database, 17 studies were eligible for inclusion in our literature review. Several surgical techniques have been described in which the most frequent were laparoscopic salpingectomy (LS), laparoscopic cornuectomy (LC), laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy (LH, VH) with en-bloc salpingectomy. There were more fractures of the device with the LS procedure (6.25%) followed by the LC technique (2.77%), while there was no fracture with hysterectomy. However, peri-and post-operative complications were more severe and frequent with hysterectomy in comparison with the LC and LS procedures (respectively 8.1% Clavien Dindo grade 3 for the hysterectomy group, 1.11% for the LC procedure and 0.69% for the LS technique).

CONCLUSION

Due to the lack of standardised surgical treatment guidelines, a system of care networks for symptomatic patients with adverse effects related to Essure^® headed by specialised centres may offer a suitable and high-quality management with the appropriate removal techniques within two objectives: limiting the risk of fracture (with an en-bloc removal of the Essure^® microinserts) and avoiding intra- and post-operative complications.