1
|
Wu T, Yang S, Fang J, Ye Y, Zhang Y, Gao J, Leng J, Zhang Z, Tang K, Bhat JA, Feng X. MutL homolog 1 participates in interference-sensitive meiotic crossover formation in soybean. Plant Physiol 2024:kiae165. [PMID: 38492234 DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiae165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), a member of the MutL-homolog family, is required for normal recombination in most organisms. However, its role in soybean (Glycine max) remains unclear to date. Here, we characterized the Glycine max female and male sterility 1 (Gmfms1) mutation that reduces pollen grain viability and increases embryo sac abortion in soybean. Map-based cloning revealed that the causal gene of Gmfms1 is Glycine max MutL homolog 1 (GmMLH1), and CRISPR/Cas9 knockout approach further validated that disruption of GmMLH1 confers the female-male sterility phenotype in soybean. Loss of GmMLH1 function disrupted bivalent formation, leading to univalent mis-segregation during meiosis and ultimately to female-male sterility. The Gmmlh1 mutant showed about a 78.16% decrease in meiotic crossover frequency compared to the wild type. The residual chiasmata followed a Poisson distribution, suggesting that interference-sensitive crossover formation was affected in the Gmmlh1 mutant. Furthermore, GmMLH1 could interact with GmMLH3A and GmMLH3B both in vivo and in vitro. Overall, our work demonstrates that GmMLH1 participates in interference-sensitive crossover formation in soybean, and provides additional information about the conserved functions of MLH1 across plant species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Wu
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
- College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Suxin Yang
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
- College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Junling Fang
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
- College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, 130118, China
| | - Yongheng Ye
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
- College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Yaohua Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
| | - Jinshan Gao
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
| | - Jiantian Leng
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
| | - Zhirui Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
- College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Kuanqiang Tang
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
| | | | - Xianzhong Feng
- Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China
- Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, 311121, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bradley RA, Wolff ID, Cohen PE, Gray S. Dynamic regulatory phosphorylation of mouse CDK2 occurs during meiotic prophase I. bioRxiv 2023:2023.07.24.550435. [PMID: 37546989 PMCID: PMC10402020 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.24.550435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
During prophase I of meiosis, DNA double-strand breaks form throughout the genome, with a subset repairing as crossover events, enabling the accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the first meiotic division. The mechanism by which DSBs become selected to repair as crossovers is unknown, although the crossover positioning and levels in each cell indicate it is a highly regulated process. One of the proteins that localises to crossover sites is the serine/threonine cyclin-dependent kinase CDK2. Regulation of CDK2 occurs via phosphorylation at tyrosine 15 (Y15) and threonine 160 (T160) inhibiting and activating the kinase, respectively. In this study we use a combination of immunofluorescence staining on spread spermatocytes and fixed testis sections, and STA-PUT gravitational sedimentation to isolate cells at different developmental stages to further investigate the temporal phospho regulation of CDK2 during prophase I. Western blotting reveals differential levels of the two CDK2 isoforms (CDK233kDa and CDK239kDa) throughout prophase I, with inhibitory phosphorylation of CDK2 at Y15 occurring early in prophase I, localising to telomeres and diminishing as cells enter pachynema. Conversely, the activatory phosphorylation on T160 occurs later, specifically the CDK233kDa isoform, and T160 signal is detected in spermatogonia and pachytene spermatocytes, where it co-localises with the Class I crossover protein MLH3. Taken together, our data reveals intricate control of CDK2 both with regards to levels of the two CDK2 isoforms, and differential regulation via inhibitory and activatory phosphorylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A. Bradley
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center (CoRe), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States of America
| | - Ian D. Wolff
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center (CoRe), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States of America
| | - Paula E. Cohen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center (CoRe), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States of America
| | - Stephen Gray
- Queen’s Medical Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Qin B, Shen Y, Zhang F, Liu C, You H, Du G, Tang D, Cheng Z. HEIP1 regulates crossover formation during meiosis in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:10810-5. [PMID: 30275327 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807871115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
During meiosis, the number of double-strand breaks (DSBs) far exceeds the final number of crossovers (COs). Therefore, to identify proteins involved in determining which of these DSBs repaired into COs is critical in understanding the mechanism of CO control. Across species, HEI10-related proteins play important roles in CO formation. Here, through screening for HEI10-interacting proteins via a yeast two-hybrid system, we identify a CO protein HEI10 Interaction Protein 1 (HEIP1) in rice. HEIP1 colocalizes with HEI10 in a dynamic fashion along the meiotic chromosomes and specially localizes onto crossover sites from late pachytene to diplotene. Between these two proteins, HEI10 is required for the loading of HEIP1, but not vice versa. Moreover, mutations of the HEIP1 gene cause the severe reduction of chiasma frequency, whereas early homologous recombination processes are not disturbed and synapsis proceeds normally. HEIP1 interacts directly with ZIP4 and MSH5. In addition, the loading of HEIP1 depends on ZIP4, but not on MER3, MSH4, or MSH5. Together, our results suggest that HEIP1 may be a member of the ZMM group and acts as a key element regulating CO formation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis depends on their ability to locate one another in the nucleus and establish a physical association through crossing over. A tightly regulated number of crossovers (COs) emerges following repair of induced DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination (HR), but the process of how HR intermediates transition into COs is still poorly understood. Two recent studies by Ahuja et al. and Rao et al. have revealed a role for chromosomally localized proteasomes in choreographing both homologous chromosome pairing and the evolution of HR intermediates into segregation-competent COs. Using chemical inhibition of the proteasome and mutant analysis, the collective data reveal conserved functions for both the proteasome and a family of E3 ligases that can direct or compete with its activity in ensuring CO formation. Here, we review these findings and the impact of the discovery that protein modification dynamics and proteasomal activity cooperate to regulate key meiotic processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Vujin
- Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Monique Zetka
- Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xue X, Papusha A, Choi K, Bonner JN, Kumar S, Niu H, Kaur H, Zheng XF, Donnianni RA, Lu L, Lichten M, Zhao X, Ira G, Sung P. Differential regulation of the anti-crossover and replication fork regression activities of Mph1 by Mte1. Genes Dev 2016; 30:687-99. [PMID: 26966246 PMCID: PMC4803054 DOI: 10.1101/gad.276139.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Xue et al. identified Mte1 as a multifunctional regulator of S. cerevisiae Mph1. Mte1 stimulates Mph1-mediated DNA replication fork regression and branch migration in a model substrate. Surprisingly, Mte1 antagonizes the D-loop-dissociative activity of Mph1–MHF and exerts a procrossover role in mitotic recombination. We identified Mte1 (Mph1-associated telomere maintenance protein 1) as a multifunctional regulator of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mph1, a member of the FANCM family of DNA motor proteins important for DNA replication fork repair and crossover suppression during homologous recombination. We show that Mte1 interacts with Mph1 and DNA species that resemble a DNA replication fork and the D loop formed during recombination. Biochemically, Mte1 stimulates Mph1-mediated DNA replication fork regression and branch migration in a model substrate. Consistent with this activity, genetic analysis reveals that Mte1 functions with Mph1 and the associated MHF complex in replication fork repair. Surprisingly, Mte1 antagonizes the D-loop-dissociative activity of Mph1–MHF and exerts a procrossover role in mitotic recombination. We further show that the influence of Mte1 on Mph1 activities requires its binding to Mph1 and DNA. Thus, Mte1 differentially regulates Mph1 activities to achieve distinct outcomes in recombination and replication fork repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Xue
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Alma Papusha
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Koyi Choi
- Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Jacob N Bonner
- Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Sandeep Kumar
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Hengyao Niu
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Hardeep Kaur
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Xiao-Feng Zheng
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Roberto A Donnianni
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | - Lucy Lu
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Michael Lichten
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Xiaolan Zhao
- Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Grzegorz Ira
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Sung
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|