1
|
Sule NO, Suissa S. Statins and Mortality in COPD: A Methodological Review of Observational Studies. COPD 2023; 20:284-291. [PMID: 37555454 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2023.2242489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials and observational studies have reported conflicting results on the potential beneficial effects of statins on mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a systematic search of the literature to review all observational studies reporting relative risks of death with statin use in COPD, focusing on potential sources of bias. We identified 15 observational studies, out of 2835, of which 12 were affected by time-related and other biases and the remaining 3 by confounding bias. All 15 studies were also subject to confounding bias due to lack of adjustment for important COPD-related factors. The risk of death associated with statin use was reduced across all 15 studies (pooled relative risk (PRR) 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.74). The reduction was observed in 7 studies with immortal time bias (PRR 0.62; 95%: 0.53-0.72), two with collider-stratification bias (PRR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45-0.80), one with time-window bias (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.98), one with immeasurable time bias (RR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.40-0.62), and one with exposure misclassification (RR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72-1.03). The three studies that avoided these biases were, however, affected by confounding bias resulting in a PRR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.61-0.98). In conclusion, the observational studies investigating statin use and mortality in COPD are affected by major biases, many of which can result in spurious protective effects. Well-designed observational studies that carefully emulate randomized trials are needed to resolve this uncertainty regarding the potential beneficial benefits of statins on mortality in patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naheemot Olaoluwa Sule
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Samy Suissa
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goodloe JB, Barakat N, Novicoff WM, Browne JA, Werner BC. The use of causal language and inferences in observational shoulder arthroplasty database studies. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:1918-1923. [PMID: 36935077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last few decades, several databases and clinical registries have been used to generate studies for orthopedic surgery research including shoulder arthroplasty. Observational database studies present data that are best used to provide information regarding associations between variables but is unable to prove causation. Yet, there remains a tendency for authors to use causal language and conclusive statements in published shoulder arthroplasty literature using such databases. METHODS We systematically identified administrative database and registry studies on shoulder arthroplasty in 5 orthopedic journals from January 2020 to December 2021. Papers were independently graded by 2 reviewers for the presence, absence, or inconsistent use of causal language throughout the publication. χ2 analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between causality language and article characteristics including the journal of publication. RESULTS There were 65 eligible articles. According to the reviewers, 67.7% of titles and abstracts were either consistently causal or inconsistently causal in language and inference. On reviewing the full text, 69.2% were found to contain some degree of causal language (38.5% consistently causal, 30.8% inconsistently causal). There were no statistically significant associations between the journal and title and abstract final grading (P = .863) or the journal and full-text grading (P = .726). CONCLUSION The use of causal language remains highly prevalent in observational database studies related to shoulder arthroplasty. Understanding the limitations of observational database studies is paramount for accurate interpretation of these publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Brett Goodloe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Nadim Barakat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Wendy M Novicoff
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - James A Browne
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Brian C Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mallur P, Ikeda A, Patel A, Raol N, Ahanotu A, Suarez-Goris D, Randolph GW, Shin JJ. Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 14: Falsehood and Bias. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:1584-1595. [PMID: 36808631 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Falsehood and bias can have tangible effects, whether related to the "hoax" of Corona virus disease/COVID-19 or the impact of personal protective equipment in city-wide news. The spread of false information requires the diversion of time and resources into rebolstering the truth. Our objective is thus to elucidate types of bias that may influence our daily work, along with ways to mitigate them. DATA SOURCES Publications are included which delineate specific aspects of bias or address how to preempt, mitigate, or correct bias, whether conscious or unconscious. REVIEW METHODS We discuss: (1) the background and rationale for proactively considering potential sources of bias, (2) relevant definitions and concepts, (3) potential means to limit effects of inaccurate data sources, and (4) evolving frontiers in the management of bias. In doing so, we review epidemiological concepts and susceptibility to bias within study designs, including database studies, observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. We additionally discuss concepts such as the difference between disinformation and misinformation, differential or nondifferential misclassification, bias toward a null result, and unconscious bias, among others. CONCLUSION We have the means to mitigate sources of potential bias in database studies, observational studies, RCTs, and systematic reviews, beginning with education and awareness. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE False information may spread faster than true information, so it is beneficial to understand potential sources of falsehood we face, in order to safeguard our daily impressions and decisions. Awareness of potential sources of falsehood and bias forms the foundation for accuracy in our everyday work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan Mallur
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allison Ikeda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Anju Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikhila Raol
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adaobi Ahanotu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dany Suarez-Goris
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory W Randolph
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer J Shin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Most research is conducted on convenience and purposive samples that may be randomly or nonrandomly drawn. A convenience sample is the one that is drawn from a source that is conveniently accessible to the researcher. A purposive sample is the one whose characteristics are defined for a purpose that is relevant to the study. The findings of a study based on convenience and purposive sampling can only be generalized to the (sub)population from which the sample is drawn and not to the entire population. This article explains the concepts involved with the help of examples of both good and bad sampling practice. Database studies and studies with enriched designs are cited as special examples of convenience and purposive sampling. Issues related to the internal and external validity of convenience and purposive samples are explained. The importance of good sampling techniques in the design and interpretation of research is understated; this must change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chittaranjan Andrade
- Dept. of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schuemie MJ, Ryan PB, Man KKC, Wong ICK, Suchard MA, Hripcsak G. A plea to stop using the case-control design in retrospective database studies. Stat Med 2019; 38:4199-4208. [PMID: 31436848 PMCID: PMC6771795 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The case‐control design is widely used in retrospective database studies, often leading to spectacular findings. However, results of these studies often cannot be replicated, and the advantage of this design over others is questionable. To demonstrate the shortcomings of applications of this design, we replicate two published case‐control studies. The first investigates isotretinoin and ulcerative colitis using a simple case‐control design. The second focuses on dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and acute pancreatitis, using a nested case‐control design. We include large sets of negative control exposures (where the true odds ratio is believed to be 1) in both studies. Both replication studies produce effect size estimates consistent with the original studies, but also generate estimates for the negative control exposures showing substantial residual bias. In contrast, applying a self‐controlled design to answer the same questions using the same data reveals far less bias. Although the case‐control design in general is not at fault, its application in retrospective database studies, where all exposure and covariate data for the entire cohort are available, is unnecessary, as other alternatives such as cohort and self‐controlled designs are available. Moreover, by focusing on cases and controls it opens the door to inappropriate comparisons between exposure groups, leading to confounding for which the design has few options to adjust for. We argue that this design should no longer be used in these types of data. At the very least, negative control exposures should be used to prove that the concerns raised here do not apply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn J Schuemie
- Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, New York.,Epidemiology Analytics, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey.,Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Patrick B Ryan
- Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, New York.,Epidemiology Analytics, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth K C Man
- Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.,Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK.,Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Ian C K Wong
- Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.,Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Marc A Suchard
- Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, New York.,Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Biomathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - George Hripcsak
- Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, New York.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.,Medical Informatics Services, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bohn J, Eddings W, Schneeweiss S. Conducting Privacy-Preserving Multivariable Propensity Score Analysis When Patient Covariate Information Is Stored in Separate Locations. Am J Epidemiol 2017; 185:501-510. [PMID: 28399565 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Distributed networks of health-care data sources are increasingly being utilized to conduct pharmacoepidemiologic database studies. Such networks may contain data that are not physically pooled but instead are distributed horizontally (separate patients within each data source) or vertically (separate measures within each data source) in order to preserve patient privacy. While multivariable methods for the analysis of horizontally distributed data are frequently employed, few practical approaches have been put forth to deal with vertically distributed health-care databases. In this paper, we propose 2 propensity score-based approaches to vertically distributed data analysis and test their performance using 5 example studies. We found that these approaches produced point estimates close to what could be achieved without partitioning. We further found a performance benefit (i.e., lower mean squared error) for sequentially passing a propensity score through each data domain (called the "sequential approach") as compared with fitting separate domain-specific propensity scores (called the "parallel approach"). These results were validated in a small simulation study. This proof-of-concept study suggests a new multivariable analysis approach to vertically distributed health-care databases that is practical, preserves patient privacy, and warrants further investigation for use in clinical research applications that rely on health-care databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Bohn
- Department of Education and Psychology, Free University Berlin, Germany
| | - Wesley Eddings
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sebastian Schneeweiss
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Farmer RD, Lawrenson RA, Todd JC, Williams TJ, MacRae KD, Tyrer F, Leydon GM. A comparison of the risks of venous thromboembolic disease in association with different combined oral contraceptives. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49:580-90. [PMID: 10848722 PMCID: PMC2015039 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00198.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS In October 1995 in response to the results of three studies, the Committee on the Safety of Medicines advised doctors and pharmacists that oral contraceptives containing desogestrel (DSG) and gestodene (GST) were associated with around a two-fold increase in the risk of thromboembolism compared with those containing other progestogens. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) in users of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), to compare the risk between formulations and to examine the effect of using age banding as opposed to matching by exact year of birth. METHODS A nested case control study was conducted using the General Practice Research Database. Women with a VTE event recorded between 1992 and 1997, who were treated with an anticoagulant, from consideration of their prescription records were likely to have been using a COC prescription on the day of the event and also had no exclusion factors, were deemed cases. For comparison with the previous studies, two nested case control studies were undertaken. Study 1 used controls matched by practice and year of birth. Study 2 used controls matched by practice and within 5 years age bands. RESULTS We found an incidence of idiopathic VTE amongst users of combined oral contraceptives of 3.8 per 10 000 exposed women years. Incidence rates increased markedly after 35 years of age. The nested case-control study using controls matched by year of birth showed no significant difference in risk between the major COC formulations. With levonorgestrel (LNG) 150 microgram and ethinyloestradiol (EE) 30 microgram as the reference, the adjusted ORs for GST 75 microgram and EE 30 microgram was 1.3 (95% CI 0.8, 2.1), for DSG 150 microgram and EE 30 microgram it was 1.0 (95% CI 0.7, 1.7) and for DSG 150 microgram and EE 20 microgram it was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4, 1.6). Using less rigorous matching criteria, matching controls to cases within 5 years age bands, the ORs increased. When a mixed group of COCs, characterized by having LNG as the progestogen component was used as the reference category, there was an elevation in the ORs for the newer products. We found a significant association between idiopathic VTE and current smoking (OR 2.0 (1.4, 2.7)), BMI over 35 (OR 3.8 (1.8, 8.0)) and asthma (OR 1.9 (1.3, 2.9)). The OR for women who had proxy evidence of general ill health (indicated by the number of prescriptions issued) was 2.2 (1.7, 3.7). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that a number of the characteristics of the women taking COCs affect the risk of VTE. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that there is any difference in risk between COC formulations containing under 50 microg ethinyloestradiol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Farmer
- European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey Research Park. Guildford. GU2 5RF, London
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
AIMS The study was conducted to determine whether the method for selecting cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) from general practice databases significantly affected the findings of an epidemiological study. METHODS Cases of VTE were identified from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) by searching for codes for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). These had to be supported by evidence of anticoagulation and be exposed to a combined oral contraceptive (COC) at the time of the event. Additional information about the event was sought from general practitioners who were requested to complete a questionnaire and to supply anonymised copies of hospital letters and discharge summaries. RESULTS Of the 285 cases identified from the GPRD, additional information was available for 177 VTE events. This information showed that 84% of those events were supported by hospital investigations or a death certificate. Using only verified cases, rather than all GPRD identified events, did not alter the results of the epidemiological study. CONCLUSIONS The GPRD provides information of sufficiently high quality to allow valid epidemiological research of VTE events. Excluding cases without a database record of hospital admission would lead to valid events being overlooked, and an under-estimate of the disease incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lawrenson
- European Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, London
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|