[ANTIMICROBIAL ALLERGY ASSESSMENT DURING PREGNANCY FOR APPROPRIATE ANTIMICROBIAL USE AT DELIVERY]

BACKGROUND

Avoidance of suspect drugs based solely on a history of drug allergy is detrimental to disease outcomes. Many antimicrobial allergy labels are not usually true allergy. Some studies have demonstrated that antimicrobial allergy assessments can be safely performed on pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of antibiotic allergy assessment during pregnancy in Japan.

METHODS

We reviewed pregnant women who reported antimicrobial allergies and were referred to the allergy center. Allergists conducted an interview and skin test and selected antibiotics that could be used at delivery.

RESULTS

Twenty-four pregnant women were referred to as having antimicrobial allergies. Most of the suspected antimicrobials were cephalosporin (13 cases, 52%) and penicillin (9 cases, 36%). Five women were ruled out only by our interviews. Of the remaining 20 cases, 10 were immediate type, 6 were non-immediate type, and 4 were unknown. All 21 pregnant women who needed antimicrobials were able to use the first-line drugs (β-lactam antimicrobials) at the time of delivery. No surgical site infections or allergic reactions were observed.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women with antimicrobial allergy labels could be evaluated by antimicrobial allergy assessment during pregnancy, and first-line antimicrobials were safely and properly used at delivery.

BSACI guideline for the set-up of penicillin allergy de-labelling services by non-allergists working in a hospital setting

The Standards of Care Committee of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and a committee of experts and key stakeholders have developed this guideline for the evaluation and testing of patients with an unsubstantiated label of penicillin allergy. The guideline is intended for UK clinicians who are not trained in allergy or immunology, but who wish to develop a penicillin allergy de-labelling service for their patients. It is intended to supplement the BSACI 2015 guideline "Management of allergy to penicillin and other beta-lactams" and therefore does not detail the epidemiology or aetiology of penicillin allergy, as this is covered extensively in the 2015 guideline (1). The guideline is intended for use only in patients with a label of penicillin allergy and does not apply to other beta-lactam allergies. The recommendations include a checklist to identify patients at low risk of allergy and a framework for the conduct of drug provocation testing by non-allergists. There are separate sections for adults and paediatrics within the guideline, in recognition of the common differences in reported allergy history and likelihood of true allergy.

Penicillin allergy de-labelling ahead of elective surgery: feasibility and barriers

BACKGROUND

Around 10-15% of the in-patient population carry unsubstantiated 'penicillin allergy' labels, the majority incorrect when tested. These labels are associated with harm from use of broad-spectrum non-penicillin antibiotics. Current testing guidelines incorporate both skin and challenge tests; this is prohibitively expensive and time-consuming to deliver on a large scale. We aimed to establish the feasibility of a rapid access de-labelling pathway for surgical patients, using direct oral challenge.

METHODS

'Penicillin allergic' patients, recruited from a surgical pre-assessment clinic, were risk-stratified using a screening questionnaire. Patients at low risk of true, immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy were offered direct oral challenge using incremental amoxicillin to a total dose of 500 mg. A 3-day course was completed at home. De-labelled patients were followed up to determine antibiotic use in surgery, and attitudes towards de-labelling were explored.

RESULTS

Of 219 patients screened, 74 were eligible for inclusion and offered testing. We subsequently tested 56 patients; 55 were de-labelled. None had a serious reaction to the supervised challenge, or thereafter. On follow-up, 17 of 19 patients received appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis during surgery. Only three of 33 de-labelled patients would have been happy for the label to be removed without prior specialist testing.

CONCLUSION

Rapid access de-labelling, using direct oral challenge in appropriately risk-stratified patients, can be incorporated into the existing surgical care pathway. This provides immediate and potential long-term benefit for patients. Interest in testing is high among patients, and clinicians appear to follow clinic recommendations. Patients are unlikely to accept removal of their allergy label on the basis of history alone.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: AN17/92982.