Long-term quality of life between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The authors aimed to compare the differences in quality of life (QOL) and overall survival (OS) between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) during long-term follow-up. DPPHR and PD have been shown to be effective in alleviating symptoms and controlling malignancies, but there is ongoing debate over whether DPPHR has an advantage over PD in terms of long-term benefits.

METHOD

The authors searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies comparing DPPHR and PD published before 1 May 2023. This study was registered with PROSPERO. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies were included. The Mantel-Haenszel model and inverse variance method were used as statistical approaches for data synthesis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of the results. The primary outcome was the global QOL score, measured using the QLQ-C30 system.

RESULTS

The authors analysed ten studies involving 976 patients (456 DPPHR and 520 PD). The global QOL score did not differ significantly between the DPPHR and PD groups [standard mean difference (SMD) 0.21, 95% CI (-0.05, 0.46), P =0.109, I2 =70%]; however, the OS time of patients with DPPHR was significantly improved [hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI (0.44, 0.77), P <0.001, I2 =0%]. The follow-up length may be an important source of heterogeneity. Studies with follow-up length between two to seven years showed better global QOL for DPPHR than for PD [SMD 0.43, 95% CI (0.23, 0.64), P <0.001, I2 =0%]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the functional scales of the QLQ-C30 system (all P >0.05). On the symptom scale, patients in the DPPHR group had lower scores for fatigue, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, insomnia, and diarrhoea than those in the PD group (all P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in global QOL scores between the two surgeries; however, DPPHR had advantages over PD in terms of safer perioperative outcomes, lower long-term symptom scores, and longer OS times. Therefore, DPPHR should be recommended over PD for the treatment of benign pancreatic diseases and low-grade malignant tumours.

Whipple Resection for Benign Tumors and Premalignant Neoplasms of the Pancreatic Head: Surgery-Associated Risk for Complications and Late Metabolic Morbidity Matters

Benign and premalignant neoplasms of the pancreas are increasingly detected and recommended for surgical treatment. For tumors of the pancreatic head, the challenging decision is: multiorgan resection or local tumor extirpation? Compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is associated with significantly fewer surgery-related serious and severe complications and lower in-hospital mortality. The decisive advantage of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is the maintenance of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal tract functions.

The Impact of Pancreatic Head Resection on Blood Glucose Homeostasis in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) often leads to recurrent pain as well as exocrine and/or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effect of pancreatic head resections on glucose metabolism in patients with CP.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), Whipple procedure (cPD), or duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) for CP between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed with regard to markers of pancreatic endocrine function including steady-state beta cell function (%B), insulin resistance (IR), and insulin sensitivity (%S) according to the updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2).

RESULTS

Out of 141 pancreatic resections for CP, 43 cases including 31 PPPD, 2 cPD and 10 DPPHR, met the inclusion criteria. Preoperatively, six patients (14%) were normoglycemic (NG), 10 patients (23.2%) had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 27 patients (62.8%) had diabetes mellitus (DM). In each subgroup, no significant changes were observed for HOMA2-%B (NG: p = 0.57; IGT: p = 0.38; DM: p = 0.1), HOMA2-IR (NG: p = 0.41; IGT: p = 0.61; DM: p = 0.18) or HOMA2-%S (NG: p = 0.44; IGT: p = 0.52; DM: p = 0.51) 3 and 12 months after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic head resections for CP, including DPPHR and pancreatoduodenectomies, do not significantly affect glucose metabolism within a follow-up period of 12 months.

[Effect of morphological state of pancreatic parenchyma on the long-term outcome of surgery for chronic pancreatitis]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of baseline morphological state of the pancreas on the long-term outcomes of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 104 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), who underwent DPPHR in 2014-2019. Pain syndrome, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency and quality of life (QoL) were assessed in long-term postoperative period. Patients were stratified depending on CT enhancement of pancreatic parenchyma as an indicator of fibrosis and amount of preserved acinar cells in resected pancreatic tissue.

RESULTS. S

Ignificant relief of pain syndrome in long-term period was observed in patients with higher density of pancreatic tissue in venous phase of CT compared to delayed phase. Moreover, these patients needed less additional enzyme intake and had higher QoL. Exocrine insufficiency depended on the number of preserved acinar cells. The percentage of preserved acinar cells also affects the QoL of patients with CP. There were no correlations between endocrine insufficiency and CT-findings, as well as the number of preserved acinar cells.

CONCLUSION

Higher CT-density of pancreatic parenchyma in venous phase indicates a lesser degree of fibrosis. It is a favorable prognostic factor for postoperative pain relief and preservation of exocrine function. The percentage of preserved acinar cells in the resected pancreatic tissue is a reliable predictor of exocrine insufficiency.

[Long-term outcomes of pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of timing of surgery, quality of resection and removal of MPD-stones on long-term results of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 110 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) who underwent DPPHR in 2014-2019. Evaluation of long-term outcomes included pain syndrome severity, exocrine and endocrine insufficiency and quality of life (QoL). Patients were stratified depending on duration of disease (within 36 months, >36 months after manifestation), volume of resected pancreatic head tissue according to CT data, removal of MPD-stones.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment within 36 months after clinical manifestation was followed by less pain syndrome (VAS score 1.16±1.76 vs. 2.03±1.87, p=0.02), exocrine insufficiency (69.8% vs. 98.5%, p<0.001). Resection of more than 50% of the pancreatic head and removal of MPD-stones were accompanied by pain relief, improved pancreatic secretory function and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic head resection in patients with chronic pancreatitis should be performed within 3 years after clinical manifestation. Resection of more than 50% of the pancreatic head with extraction of MPD-stones ensures pain relief, better endocrine and exocrine function, as well as higher QoL in long-term follow-up period.

Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are uncommon neoplasms and are potentially malignant. Complete resection is advised due to rare recurrence and metastasis. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) is indicated for SPNs located in the pancreatic head and is only performed using the open approach. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports describing laparoscopic DPPHR (LDPPHR) for SPNs.

METHODS

Herein, we report a case of 41-year-old female presented with a 1-week history of epigastric abdominal discomfort, and founded an SPN of the pancreatic head by abdominal computed tomography/magnetic resonance, who was treated by radical LDPPHR without complications, such as pancreatic fistula and bile leakage. Histological examination of the resected specimen confirmed the diagnosis of SPN.

RESULTS

The patient was discharged 1 week after surgery following an uneventful postoperative period. She was followed up 3 months without readmission and local recurrence according to abdominal ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

LDPPHR is a safe, feasible, and effective surgical procedure for SPNs.

Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic main duct dilatation: long term results after head resection and duct drainage

Tissue and duct hypertension is considered as a major factor in the etiology of pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). Duct dilatation is a consequence of duct obstruction due to scars or duct stones. Nevertheless, the procedure of choice, drainage or resection, is still under discussion. We present long-term results of patients operated with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) combined with a Partington-Rochelle duct drainage in cases of chronic pancreatitis with multiple stenosis and dilatation of the side ducts.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

From April 1982 to September 2001, in 55 out of 538 patients with chronic pancreatitis, a DPPHR with additionally Partington-Rochelle duct drainage was performed (44 male, 11 female, mean age 45.8 years). Ninety-two percent of the patients suffered from alcoholic pancreatitis. Medical respective pain treatment for chronic pancreatitis was in median 64.5 months prior to surgery. The indications for surgery were in 87% pain, 59% of the patients had an inflammatory mass in the head of the pancreas, 36% a common bile duct stenosis and 5% a severe stenosis of the duodenum. The endocrine function (OGGT) was impaired in 79% of the patients preoperatively.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 0%, postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients.

FOLLOW-UP

All except 2 patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic with the mean follow-up time of 69.7 months (8-105 months), the late mortality was 9%. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were completely free of pain, 29% had occasional pain, 3% suffered from a further attack of pancreatitis. Body weight increased in 79%, 58% were professionally rehabilitated. Late postoperative endocrine function was unchanged in 85% (improved in 5%, deteriorated in 10%).

CONCLUSION

The pain control in patients with multiple duct stenosis after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with duct drainage leads to long-standing absence of pain and low recurrence rate of attacks of pancreatitis.