The Effects of Premedication With Three Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous dexmedetomidine is one of the commonly preferred techniques for sedation during any regional procedure. However, only a very few studies compared the impact of different bolus doses during spinal anesthesia, and none for our geographical area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients were allocated into either of the three groups (group I, II, III) to receive intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mcg/kg, respectively. The primary outcome was to compare the duration of sensory and motor blockade and the secondary outcomes were the level of sedation, hemodynamic stability, duration of analgesia, and the side effects, if any.

RESULTS

Two-dermatome regression time and the duration of motor block were significantly higher in groups II and III when compared to group I. However, the difference in duration of analgesia, Ramsay sedation scores, bradycardia, and hypotension was statistically insignificant between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous dexmedetomidine in doses of 0.75 and 1 mcg/kg significantly prolongs the two-dermatome regression time and duration of the motor block when compared to 0.5 mcg/kg dose. Hence, it is better to titrate the dose between 0.75 and 1 mcg/kg, as the administration of bolus intravenous Dex in doses ranging between 0.75 and 1 mcg/kg appears to provide adequate intraoperative block characteristics while maintaining hemodynamic stability without any significant respiratory depression or other adverse effects.

Comparison of Different Doses of Clonidine as an Additive to Intrathecal Isobaric Levobupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgeries

Background:

Spinal anesthesia is a safe, reliable, and inexpensive technique with the advantage of providing surgical anesthesia and prolonged postoperative pain relief, and it also blunts autonomic, somatic, and endocrine responses to surgical stimulus.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy 15 μg and 30 μg of intrathecal clonidine along with 3 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine in comparison with plain 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine.

Setting and Design:

The prospective, interventional, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study was conducted after obtaining approval from the institutional ethical committee.

Materials and Methods:

Seventy-five patients posted for elective lower-limb orthopedic surgeries were randomly divided into three groups with 25 patients in each group as L (levobupivacaine 0.5%), LC-15 (levobupivacaine 0.5% + clonidine 15 μg), and LC-30 (levobupivacaine 0.5% + clonidine 30 μg). All the patients were given spinal anesthesia using the study drugs, and various parameters were monitored.

Statistical Analysis:

The three groups were compared statistically using analysis of variance and Student's t-test (independent samples t-test). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

There was a statistically significant difference among the three groups with respect to the onset of time for maximum sensory blockade and duration of analgesia. A statistically significant difference was noted among the three groups with respect to the onset of time for maximum motor blockade.

Conclusion:

Both doses of clonidine produced prolonged sensory block compared to the control. It has been found that 30 μg of clonidine as an adjuvant has produced faster onset and prolonged duration sensory block compared to 15 μg of clonidine.

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominus Plane Block and Caudal Block for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatric Population: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study

Background:

Caudal analgesia was a widely practiced regional anesthesia technique in pediatric population. Transversus abdominus plane block (TAP) block has recently emerged as a promising analgesic method in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries.

Aim:

This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block and caudal block.

Setting:

This study was conducted in the department of anesthesiology of a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Design:

This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty-two children of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II undergoing inguinal hernia repair received TAP block at a dose of 0.5 ml.kg^{− 1} of 0.25% bupivacaine (Group A) or caudal block at a dose of 1 ml.kg^{− 1} of 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) after randomization. The children were analyzed by comparing the post operative pain scores and duration of analgesia. Statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS software 23 version. Unpaired sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used to compare the means of continuous variables. Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test was used to find the association between categorical variables.

Results:

Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, weight, and surgery duration. Duration of analgesia was longer in TAP block group compared to that of caudal analgesia (12.93 ± 2.91 h vs. 6.52 ± 1.67 P < 0.001). The postoperative pain scores were comparable up to 6 h and at 24 h. Pain scores at 12 h and 18 h were significantly higher in caudal analgesia group compared to that of TAP block group.

Conclusion:

Children who received TAP block had prolonged duration of analgesia and lower pain scores compared to those who received caudal analgesia.

Postoperative analgesia in pediatric herniotomy - Comparison of caudal bupivacaine to bupivacaine infiltration with diclofenac suppository

CONTEXT

Perioperative analgesia in paediatric herniotomies demand safe, effective and less invasive strategies. Local infiltration with Bupivacaine, rectal Diclofenac and caudal Bupivacaine are widely used for pain relief.

AIMS

To compare the analgesic effects of caudal epidural using 1 mlkg(-1) of 0.25% Bupivacaine against a combination of local infiltration 0.25% Bupivacaine 0.5 mlkg(-1) with Diclofenac suppository 2 mgkg(-1) in the management of post-operative pain following paediatric inguinal herniotomy.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This is an observational study from a tertiary care teaching hospital.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

A total of 60 children for elective unilateral inguinal herniotomy were assigned to two groups of 30 each. Patients who received caudal block with 1 mlkg(-1) of 0.25% Bupivacaine were allocated to Group A and who received Diclofenac suppository 2 mgkg(-1) and infiltration with 0.25% Bupivacaine 0.5 mlkg(-1) were allocated to Group B. Post operative Pain was assessed using Hannallah's modified objective pain scale. At score ≥3 rescue analgesic oral Paracetamol 15 mgkg(-1) was given. Pain was assessed at 0,15,30,45,60 minutes and half hourly thereafter until 8 hours following surgery or until patient requires rescue analgesic whichever happens first.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Employed SPSS software. Data was analysed using sample t test and P-value was calculated.

RESULTS

The demographic profile was comparable between two groups. The mean analgesic duration in group A and group B was 228.5 and 331.0 minutes respectively and is found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Diclofenac suppository with local infiltration is a less invasive and effective alternative to caudal Bupivacaine for analgesia in paediatric herniotomy.

Effect of clonidine as adjuvant in bupivacaine-induced supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomized controlled trial

Objective:

Clonidine has been used as adjuvant to local anesthetics in order to extend the duration of analgesia in various regional and central neuraxial blocks. It is previously reported that clonidine added to bupivacaine increases analgesia duration in brachial plexus block. We evaluated the effect of this combination in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb orthopedic procedures.

Materials and Methods:

A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial was done with 70 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I or II status undergoing upper limb orthopedic procedures. Group A (n = 35) patients received 25 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.2 ml (30 mcg) clonidine, whereas group B (n = 35) received 25 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.2 ml normal saline through a supraclavicular approach for brachial plexus block. Vital parameters were recorded 10 min prior to block placement and every 3 min thereafter till the end of the procedure. Onset and duration of both sensory and motor blocks and sedation score were recorded. All patients were observed in postanesthesia care unit and received tramadol injection as soon as they complained of pain as rescue analgesic. Duration of analgesia was taken as the time from placement of block till injection of rescue analgesic.

Results:

Analgesia duration was 415.4 ± 38.18 min (mean ± standard deviation) in Group A (clonidine) compared to 194.2 ± 28.74 min in Group B (control). No clinically significant difference was observed in heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation. Sedation score was higher in the clonidine group.

Conclusion:

Addition of a small dose of clonidine to 0.5% bupivacaine significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia without producing any clinically important adverse reactions other than sedation.