Drug Overdose Patterns Among Emergency Department Patients at an Academic Hospital in Jeddah

Background Drug overdose is a significant healthcare issue and remains a common phenomenon in the emergency department (ED). The incidents have increased over the last few years worldwide. There are a few studies about drug overdose in Saudi Arabia in general and Jeddah city specifically. We aimed to describe the pattern of drug overdoses in the emergency department at an academic hospital in Jeddah between 2015-2022. Methodology A retrospective record review study was done in 2022 at an academic hospital in Jeddah between 2015-2021, where charts were reviewed for all reported patients presenting to the ED with drug overdose, including all ages and both genders. A careful review of their medical records, data collection, and processing was done using Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, California) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington), respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 software (IBM Inc. Armonk, New York). Results Seventy-eight patients were identified, meeting the criteria from the medical records. Most of the patients were children under 12 years of age. Most patients were clinically stable when they arrived at the emergency department. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common clinical presentations, followed by drowsiness, while some patients were non-symptomatic. Analgesics and nonsteroidal were the most common causes of drug overdose. Conclusion We concluded from this limited study that the most commonly used causative agent in drug overdoses was nonsteroidal and analgesics. Moreover, children younger than 12 years of age constituted the majority of drug overdose patients, and accidental overdose represented the majority of cases. Therefore, it is important to increase public awareness of proper child supervision and keep drugs out of children's reach. More research using larger and more representative data is needed to identify patterns of drug overdose in the community.

Adapting Caring Contacts for Veterans in a Department of Veterans Affairs Emergency Department: Results From a Type 2 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Study

Transitions in care, such as discharge from an emergency department (ED), are periods of increased risk for suicide and effective interventions that target these periods are needed. Caring Contacts is an evidence-based suicide prevention intervention that targets transitions, yet it has not been widely implemented. This pilot study adapted Caring Contacts for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) ED setting and population, created an implementation toolkit, and piloted implementation and evaluation of effectiveness. To inform adaptation, qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders. Data were used by an advisory board comprised of stakeholders, experts, and veterans to make adaptations and develop an implementation planning guide to delineate steps needed to implement. Key decisions about how to adapt Caring Contacts included recipients, author, content, and the schedule for sending. Pilot implementation occurred at one VA ED. Caring Contacts involved sending patients at risk of suicide brief, non-demanding expressions of care. Program evaluation of the pilot used a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to both pilot an implementation strategy and evaluate effectiveness of Caring Contacts. Evaluation included qualitative interviews with veteran patients during implementation. VA electronic health records were used to evaluate VA service utilization in the 6-month periods immediately before and after veterans were delivered their first Caring Contact. Hundred and seventy-five veterans were mailed Caring Contacts and the facility continued adoption after the pilot. Participants were positive about the intervention and reported feeling cared about and connected to VA as a result of receiving Caring Contacts. This project developed an implementation planning process that successfully implemented Caring Contacts at one site. This can be used to further implement Caring Contacts at additional VA or community EDs.

Comparison of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula flow rates (1-L·kg·min-1 vs 2-L·kg·min -1 ) in the management of acute bronchiolitis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) flow rate of 1-L·kg·min^-1 (1 L) with 2-L·kg·min ^-1 (2 L) in patients with severe bronchiolitis presenting to the pediatric emergency department.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a study in which all patients were allocated to receive these two flow rates. The primary outcome was admitted as treatment failure, which was defined as a clinical escalation in respiratory status. Secondary outcomes covered a decrease of respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), the clinical respiratory score (CRS), rise of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO₂ ), and rates of weaning, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight cases (88 received the 1-L flow rate and 80, the 2-L flow rate) were included in the analyses. Treatment failure was 11.4% (10 of 88) in the 1-L group, and 10% (8 of 80) in the 2-L group (P = .775). Significant variation in the intubation rate or the ICU admission rate was not determined. At the 2nd hour, the rate of weaning (53.4% vs 35%; P = .017), the falling down of the CRS (-2.1 vs -1.5; P < .001), RR (-15.2 vs -11.8; P < .001), and HR (- 24.8 vs - 21.2; P < .001), and the increase of SpO ₂ (4.8 vs 3.6; P < .001) were significantly more evident in the 1-L group.

CONCLUSION

HHHFNC with the 1-L·kg·min^-1 flow rate, which provides a more frequent earlier effect, reached therapy success as high as the 2-L·kg·min ^-1 flow rate in patients with severe acute bronchiolitis.

Food for Thought: A Randomized Trial of Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing interest in screening for food insecurity in the clinical setting, little evidence exists regarding screening formats that maximize disclosure and caregiver comfort.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, we asked English-speaking adult caregivers of pediatric patients in the emergency department at an urban, freestanding children's hospital to complete a validated, 2-question screen for food insecurity. Respondents were assigned via block randomization to complete the survey by either verbal interview or electronic tablet. Caregivers reported the perceived importance of the screening questions, comfort level with screening in the emergency department or in their child's primary care site, and their preferred screening modality.

RESULTS

Of the 1818 participants, 20.6% screened positive for food insecurity. There was a significantly higher rate of reported food insecurity for those screened by tablet (23.6%) compared to those screened verbally (17.7%) (P = .002). Of those who had a preference of screening modality, 83.2% of all participants and 84.5% of patients reporting food insecurity preferred the tablet-based screen over verbal interview. Overall, more participants reported comfort completing the screen in the emergency department compared to their child's doctor's office; however, comfort in both of these setting was rated highly (86.1% vs 80.2%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both verbal interview and tablet-based screening modalities were effective in identifying food insecurity, tablet-based screening had a higher disclosure rate and was the participants' preferred screening method. There is a high level of comfort with screening regardless of clinical setting; it is possible that an added level of anonymity in the emergency department enhanced participants' comfort levels.