1
|
Liebig-Gonglach M, Neunhäuserer L, Kuenen J, Hoffmann B, Soppa V, Diegmann V, Hornberg C. Environmental Burden of Disease due to Emissions of Hard Coal- and Lignite-Fired Power Plants in Germany. Int J Public Health 2023; 68:1606083. [PMID: 37645593 PMCID: PMC10460906 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The study estimated the environmental burden of disease (EBD) attributable to a long-term exposure of the population to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions from hard coal- and lignite-fired power plants in Germany for the year 2015. Methods: The contribution of coal-fired power plants to the total air pollutant concentration was modelled using a chemical transport model and then combined with population data to assess the corresponding population exposure. We calculated years of life lost (YLL), years of life with disability, or disability-adjusted life years for different health outcomes with a strong evidence for an association with the exposure. Results: The burden of disease from PM2.5 emissions from lignite is 1.2 times higher than that from hard coal emissions (7,866 YLL compared to 6,412 YLL). NO2 emissions from lignite, cause a burden of disease 2.3 times higher than hard coal NO2-emission (13,537 YLL compared to 5,906 YLL). The EBD for both pollutants is dominated by diseases of the cardiovascular system. Conclusion: Abandoning energy generation by coal-fired power plants would lower the burden of disease in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Liebig-Gonglach
- Department of Sustainable Environmental Health Sciences, Medical School East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Jeroen Kuenen
- Department of Climate, Air and Sustainability, TNO (Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast-natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Barbara Hoffmann
- Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Vanessa Soppa
- Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Hornberg
- Department of Sustainable Environmental Health Sciences, Medical School East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tobollik M, Kienzler S, Schuster C, Wintermeyer D, Plass D. Burden of Disease Due to Ambient Particulate Matter in Germany-Explaining the Differences in the Available Estimates. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:13197. [PMID: 36293778 PMCID: PMC9602590 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Ambient particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution is an important threat to human health. The aim of this study is to estimate the environmental burden of disease (EBD) for the German population associated with PM2.5 exposure in Germany for the years 2010 until 2018. The EBD method was used to quantify relevant indicators, e.g., disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and the life table approach was used to estimate the reduction in life expectancy caused by long-term PM2.5 exposure. The impact of varying assumptions and input data was assessed. From 2010 to 2018 in Germany, the annual population-weighted PM2.5 concentration declined from 13.7 to 10.8 µg/m3. The estimates of annual PM2.5-attributable DALYs for all disease outcomes showed a downward trend. In 2018, the highest EBD was estimated for ischemic heart disease (101.776; 95% uncertainty interval (UI) 62,713-145,644), followed by lung cancer (60,843; 95% UI 43,380-79,379). The estimates for Germany differ from those provided by other institutions. This is mainly related to considerable differences in the input data, the use of a specific German national life expectancy and the selected relative risks. A transparent description of input data, computational steps, and assumptions is essential to explain differing results of EBD studies to improve methodological credibility and trust in the results. Furthermore, the different calculated indicators should be explained and interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Tobollik
- German Environment Agency, Department Environmental Hygiene, Corrensplatz, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Kienzler
- German Environment Agency, Department Environmental Hygiene, Corrensplatz, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Schuster
- German Environment Agency, Department Environmental Hygiene, Corrensplatz, 14195 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Transfer Unit Science Communication, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Wintermeyer
- German Environment Agency, Department Environmental Hygiene, Corrensplatz, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dietrich Plass
- German Environment Agency, Department Environmental Hygiene, Corrensplatz, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deguen S, Marchetta GP, Kihal-Talantikite W. Measuring Burden of Disease Attributable to Air Pollution Due to Preterm Birth Complications and Infant Death in Paris Using Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17:E7841. [PMID: 33114696 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Several studies have found maternal exposure to particulate matter pollution was associated with adverse birth outcomes, including infant mortality and preterm birth. In this context, our study aims to quantify the air pollution burden of disease due to preterm birth complications and infant death in Paris, with particular attention to people living in the most deprived census blocks. Data on infant death and preterm birth was available from the birth and death certificates. The postal address of mother’s newborn was converted in census block number. A socioeconomic deprivation index was built at the census block level. Average annual ambient concentrations of PM10 were modelled at census block level using the ESMERALDA atmospheric modelling system. The number of infant deaths attributed to PM10 exposure is expressed in years of life lost. We used a three-step compartmental model to appraise neurodevelopmental impairment among survivors of preterm birth. We estimated that 12.8 infant deaths per 100,000 live births may be attributable to PM10 exposure, and about one third of these infants lived in deprived census blocks. In addition, we found that approximately 4.8% of preterm births could be attributable to PM10 exposure, and approximately 1.9% of these infants died (corresponding to about 5.75 deaths per 100,000 live birth). Quantification of environmental hazard-related health impacts for children at local level is essential to prioritizing interventions. Our study suggests that additional effort is needed to reduce the risk of complications and deaths related to air pollution exposure, especially among preterm births. Because of widespread exposure to air pollution, significant health benefits could be achieved through regulatory interventions aimed at reducing exposure of the population as a whole, and particularly of the most vulnerable, such as children and pregnant women.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hammitt JK, Morfeld P, Tuomisto JT, Erren TC. Premature Deaths, Statistical Lives, and Years of Life Lost: Identification, Quantification, and Valuation of Mortality Risks. Risk Anal 2020; 40:674-695. [PMID: 31820829 PMCID: PMC7217195 DOI: 10.1111/risa.13427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Mortality effects of exposure to air pollution and other environmental hazards are often described by the estimated number of "premature" or "attributable" deaths and the economic value of a reduction in exposure as the product of an estimate of "statistical lives saved" and a "value per statistical life." These terms can be misleading because the number of deaths advanced by exposure cannot be determined from mortality data alone, whether from epidemiology or randomized trials (it is not statistically identified). The fraction of deaths "attributed" to exposure is conventionally derived as the hazard fraction (R - 1)/R, where R is the relative risk of mortality between high and low exposure levels. The fraction of deaths advanced by exposure (the "etiologic" fraction) can be substantially larger or smaller: it can be as large as one and as small as 1/e (≈0.37) times the hazard fraction (if the association is causal and zero otherwise). Recent literature reveals misunderstanding about these concepts. Total life years lost in a population due to exposure can be estimated but cannot be disaggregated by age or cause of death. Economic valuation of a change in exposure-related mortality risk to a population is not affected by inability to know the fraction of deaths that are etiologic. When individuals facing larger or smaller changes in mortality risk cannot be identified, the mean change in population hazard is sufficient for valuation; otherwise, the economic value can depend on the distribution of risk reductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James K. Hammitt
- Harvard University (Center for Risk Analysis & Center for Health Decision Science)Boston, MA, USA and Toulouse School of EconomicsUniversité Toulouse CapitoleToulouseFrance
| | - Peter Morfeld
- Ruhr‐Universität BochumUniversity of Cologne (Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research)KölnGermany
| | | | - Thomas C. Erren
- University of Cologne (Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research)KölnGermany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mason K, Lindberg K, Read D, Borman B. The Importance of Using Public Health Impact Criteria to Develop Environmental Health Indicators: The Example of the Indoor Environment in New Zealand. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15:E1786. [PMID: 30127284 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15081786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Developing environmental health indicators is challenging and applying a conceptual framework and indicator selection criteria may not be sufficient to prioritise potential indicators to monitor. This study developed a new approach for prioritising potential environmental health indicators, using the example of the indoor environment for New Zealand. A three-stage process of scoping, selection, and design was implemented. A set of potential indicators (including 4 exposure indicators and 20 health indicators) were initially identified and evaluated against indicator selection criteria. The health indicators were then further prioritised according to their public health impact and assessed by the five following sub-criteria: number of people affected (based on environmental burden of disease statistics); severity of health impact; whether vulnerable populations were affected and/or large inequalities were apparent; whether the indicator related to multiple environmental exposures; and policy relevance. Eight core indicators were ultimately selected, as follows: living in crowded households, second-hand smoke exposure, maternal smoking at two weeks post-natal, asthma prevalence, asthma hospitalisations, lower respiratory tract infection hospitalisations, meningococcal disease notifications, and sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI). Additionally, indicators on living in damp and mouldy housing and children's injuries in the home, were identified as potential indicators, along with attributable burden indicators. Using public health impact criteria and an environmental burden of disease approach was valuable in prioritising and selecting the most important health impacts to monitor, using robust evidence and objective criteria.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lebret E. Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment for Risk Governance Purposes; Across What Do We Integrate? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 13:ijerph13010071. [PMID: 26703709 PMCID: PMC4730462 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13010071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2015] [Revised: 10/14/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment (IEHIA) can be considered as an element in the third phase of environmental risk management. Its focus is on providing inclusive descriptions of multiple impacts from multiple stressors in such a way that they can be evaluated against the potential societal benefits of the causes of the stressors. This paper emphasises some differences and difficulties in the integration across professional paradigms and scientific fields, across stakeholder perspectives and differences in impact indicators that emanate from these different fields and paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Lebret
- National Institute of Public Health and the Environment-RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences-IRAS, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 2, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Briggs D, Mason K, Borman B. Rapid Assessment of Environmental Health Impacts for Policy Support: The Example of Road Transport in New Zealand. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 13:ijerph13010061. [PMID: 26703699 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13010061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Revised: 11/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
An integrated environmental health impact assessment of road transport in New Zealand was carried out, using a rapid assessment. The disease and injury burden was assessed from traffic-related accidents, air pollution, noise and physical (in)activity, and impacts attributed back to modal source. In total, road transport was found to be responsible for 650 deaths in 2012 (2.1% of annual mortality): 308 from traffic accidents, 283 as a result of air pollution, and 59 from noise. Together with morbidity, these represent a total burden of disease of 26,610 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). An estimated 40 deaths and 1874 DALYs were avoided through active transport. Cars are responsible for about 52% of attributable deaths, but heavy goods vehicles (6% of vehicle kilometres travelled, vkt) accounted for 21% of deaths. Motorcycles (1 per cent of vkt) are implicated in nearly 8% of deaths. Overall, impacts of traffic-related air pollution and noise are low compared to other developed countries, but road accident rates are high. Results highlight the need for policies targeted at road accidents, and especially at heavy goods vehicles and motorcycles, along with more general action to reduce the reliance on private road transport. The study also provides a framework for national indicator development.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tobollik M, Razum O, Wintermeyer D, Plass D. Burden of Outdoor Air Pollution in Kerala, India—A First Health Risk Assessment at State Level. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12:10602-19. [PMID: 26343701 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120910602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Revised: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Ambient air pollution causes a considerable disease burden, particularly in South Asia. The objective of the study is to test the feasibility of applying the environmental burden of disease method at state level in India and to quantify a first set of disease burden estimates due to ambient air pollution in Kerala. Particulate Matter (PM) was used as an indicator for ambient air pollution. The disease burden was quantified in Years of Life Lost (YLL) for the population (30 + years) living in urban areas of Kerala. Scenario analyses were performed to account for uncertainties in the input parameters. 6108 (confidence interval (95% CI): 4150–7791) of 81,636 total natural deaths can be attributed to PM, resulting in 96,359 (95% CI: 65,479–122,917) YLLs due to premature mortality (base case scenario, average for 2008–2011). Depending on the underlying assumptions the results vary between 69,582 and 377,195 YLLs. Around half of the total burden is related to cardiovascular deaths. Scenario analyses show that a decrease of 10% in PM concentrations would save 15,904 (95% CI: 11,090–19,806) life years. The results can be used to raise awareness about air quality standards at a local level and to support decision-making processes aiming at cleaner and healthier environments.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoon SJ, Kim HS, Ha J, Kim EJ. Measuring the Environmental Burden of Disease in South Korea: A Population-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12:7938-48. [PMID: 26184265 PMCID: PMC4515701 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120707938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Revised: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study attempted to measure the environmental burden of disease by examining mortality and disability rates in South Korea, permitting international comparisons. METHODS Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) was used to analyze data from public records. Years of life lost (YLL) and years lost to disability (YLD) were measured in terms of incidence rate and number of deaths. Attributable risks were based on those for WHO Western Pacific Regions. For air pollution, attributable risk was calculated using local PM10 levels and relative risk. RESULTS The total Korean environmental burden of disease was 17.98 per 1000 persons and the most serious risk factor was air pollution, at 6.89 per 1000 persons. Occupation was the second highest contributing factor, at 3.29 per 1000 persons, followed by indoor air pollution at 2.91 per 1000 persons. The DALY of air-pollution (indoor and outdoor) was 9.80 per 1000 persons, accounting for more than half of the total environmental burden of disease. The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and asthma were 4.07, 3.16, and 1.96 per 1000 persons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Respiratory illnesses comprised most of the disease burden, the majority of which was linked to air pollution. The present results are important as they could be used to make evidence-based decisions regarding the management of diseases and environmental-risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seok-Jun Yoon
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 136-705, Korea.
| | - Hyeong-Su Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, KonKuk University, Seoul 143-729, Korea.
| | - Jongsik Ha
- Korea Adaptation Center for Climate Change, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong 339-007, Korea.
| | - Eun-Jung Kim
- Department of Economics, Economic Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Steckling N, Bose-O’Reilly S, Pinheiro P, Plass D, Shoko D, Drasch G, Bernaudat L, Siebert U, Hornberg C. The burden of chronic mercury intoxication in artisanal small-scale gold mining in Zimbabwe: data availability and preliminary estimates. Environ Health 2014; 13:111. [PMID: 25495641 PMCID: PMC4290131 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069x-13-111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 12/04/2014] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artisanal small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is a poverty-driven activity practiced in over 70 countries worldwide. Zimbabwe is amongst the top ten countries using large quantities of mercury to extract gold from ore. This analysis was performed to check data availability and derive a preliminary estimate of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to mercury use in ASGM in Zimbabwe. METHODS Cases of chronic mercury intoxication were identified following an algorithm using mercury-related health effects and mercury in human specimens. The sample prevalence amongst miners and controls (surveyed by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization in 2004 and the University of Munich in 2006) was determined and extrapolated to the entire population of Zimbabwe. Further epidemiological and demographic data were taken from the literature and missing data modeled with DisMod II to quantify DALYs using the methods from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2004 update published by the World Health Organization (WHO). While there was no disability weight (DW) available indicating the relative disease severity of chronic mercury intoxication, the DW of a comparable disease was assigned by following the criteria 1) chronic condition, 2) triggered by a substance, and 3) causing similar health symptoms. RESULTS Miners showed a sample prevalence of 72% while controls showed no cases of chronic mercury intoxication. Data availability is very limited why it was necessary to model data and make assumptions about the number of exposed population, the definition of chronic mercury intoxication, DW, and epidemiology. If these assumptions hold, the extrapolation would result in around 95,400 DALYs in Zimbabwe's total population in 2004. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides a preliminary quantification of the mercury-related health burden from ASGM based on the limited data available. If the determined assumptions hold, chronic mercury intoxication is likely to have been one of the top 20 hazards for population health in Zimbabwe in 2004 when comparing with more than 130 categories of diseases and injuries quantified in the WHO's GBD 2004 update. Improving data quality would allow more accurate estimates. However, the results highlight the need to reduce a burden which could be entirely avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Steckling
- />Department Environment & Health, Bielefeld University, School of Public Health, Universitätsstraße 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
- />University Hospital Munich, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Occupational Health, Workgroup Paediatric Environmental Epidemiology, Ziemssenstr. 1, D-80336 Munich, Germany
- />UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Eduard Wallnoefer Center I, A-6060 Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Stephan Bose-O’Reilly
- />University Hospital Munich, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Occupational Health, Workgroup Paediatric Environmental Epidemiology, Ziemssenstr. 1, D-80336 Munich, Germany
- />UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Eduard Wallnoefer Center I, A-6060 Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Paulo Pinheiro
- />Bielefeld University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Universitätsstraße 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Dietrich Plass
- />Federal Environment Agency, Section Exposure Assessment and Environmental Health Indicators, Corrensplatz 1, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Shoko
- />Tailjet Consultancy Services, 4 Tor Road, Vainona, Borrowdale, Harare Zimbabwe
| | - Gustav Drasch
- />Institute of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Toxicology, University of Munich - LMU, Nussbaumstr. 26, D-80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Ludovic Bernaudat
- />United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 300, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- />UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Eduard Wallnoefer Center I, A-6060 Hall i.T., Austria
- />Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Boston, USA
- />Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, USA
| | - Claudia Hornberg
- />Department Environment & Health, Bielefeld University, School of Public Health, Universitätsstraße 25, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gibson JM, Farah ZS. Environmental risks to public health in the United Arab Emirates: a quantitative assessment and strategic plan. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120:681-6. [PMID: 22357098 PMCID: PMC3346776 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2011] [Accepted: 01/18/2012] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental risks to health in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have shifted rapidly from infectious to noninfectious diseases as the nation has developed at an unprecedented rate. In response to public concerns over newly emerging environmental risks, the Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi commissioned a multidisciplinary environmental health strategic planning project. OBJECTIVES In order to develop the environmental health strategic plan, we sought to quantify the illnesses and premature deaths in the UAE attributable to 14 environmental pollutant categories, prioritize these 14 risk factors, and identify interventions. METHODS We estimated the disease burden imposed by each risk factor using an attributable fraction approach, and we prioritized the risks using an empirically tested stakeholder engagement process. We then engaged government personnel, scientists, and other stakeholders to identify interventions. RESULTS The UAE's environmental disease burden is low by global standards. Ambient air pollution is the leading contributor to premature mortality [~ 650 annual deaths; 95% confidence interval (CI): 140, 1,400]. Risk factors leading to > 10,000 annual health care facility visits included occupational exposures, indoor air pollution, drinking water contamination, seafood contamination, and ambient air pollution. Among the 14 risks considered, on average, outdoor air pollution was ranked by the stakeholders as the highest priority (mean rank, 1.4; interquartile range, 1-2) and indoor air pollution as the second-highest priority (mean rank 3.3; interquartile range, 2-4). The resulting strategic plan identified 216 potential interventions for reducing environmental risks to health. CONCLUSIONS The strategic planning exercise described here provides a framework for systematically deciding how to invest public funds to maximize expected returns in environmental health, where returns are measured in terms of reductions in a population's environmental burden of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7431, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|