1
|
Hultman L, Hultman M. "Believe me, only I know how I feel." An autoethnographic account of experiences of epistemic injustice in mental health care. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1058422. [PMID: 36911123 PMCID: PMC9997454 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1058422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In Sweden, support and service for people with disabilities is provided under the Swedish disability legislation, which has a clear focus on the individual's right to a life like that of any other citizen and on promoting equality and participation in society. Nevertheless, having a physical impairment makes it clear that equal mental health care is not provided in practice. This becomes particularly salient when there is a need for mental health in-patient care. In this article, the aim is to explore our own experiences of epistemic injustice in relation to mental health care provision in a situation where one of us has a mobility impairment that require the presence of personal assistants in everyday life. Critical personal narrative is applied to highlight the different, but intertwined experiences of a young female mental health user with a physical disability and her mother. Diary entrances, shared discussions and extracts from health care records are used to illustrate how epistemic injustice may occur in health care practices. In the analysis, we use Fricker's concepts that relate to different aspects of epistemic injustice, to show how power is exerted. Healthcare professionals' inability to value and integrate patients experience-based knowledge into practice where the lack of a holistic perspective visualizes what happens when people do not fit into predefined categories. Instead of strengthening patients' rights, health care professionals discredit patients' and family members knowledge, and thereby giving themselves epistemic privilege. People with the combined experience of both disabilities and mental health issues are vulnerable to epistemic injustice and epistemic harm since they are commonly denied both epistemic credibility and authority. Our results highlight the importance of counteracting resilient structures of social privilege and power and identifying and, in as far as possible, removing the mechanisms that exclude the epistemic resources of people with disabilities and their family members from being part of shared epistemic resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lill Hultman
- Department of Social Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith K, McLeod J, Blunden N, Cooper M, Gabriel L, Kupfer C, McLeod J, Murphie MC, Oddli HW, Thurston M, Winter LA. A Pluralistic Perspective on Research in Psychotherapy: Harnessing Passion, Difference and Dialogue to Promote Justice and Relevance. Front Psychol 2021; 12:742676. [PMID: 34552542 PMCID: PMC8450328 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The adoption of a pluralistic perspective on research design, processes of data collection and analysis and dissemination of findings, has the potential to enable psychotherapy research to make a more effective contribution to building a just society. A review of the key features of the concept of pluralism is followed by a historical analysis of the ways in which research in counselling, psychotherapy and related disciplines has moved in the direction of a pluralistic position around knowledge creation. Core principles of a pluralistic approach to research are identified and explored in the context of a critical case study of contemporary research into psychotherapy for depression, examples of pluralistically oriented research practices, and analysis of a pluralistic conceptualisation of the nature of evidence. Implications of a pluralistic perspective for research training and practice are discussed. Pluralistic inquiry that emphasises dialogue, collaboration, epistemic justice and the co-existence of multiple truths, creates opportunities for individuals, families and communities from a wide range of backgrounds to co-produce knowledge in ways that support their capacities for active citizenship and involvement in open democratic decision-making. To fulfil these possibilities, it is necessary for psychotherapy research to be oriented towards social goals that are sufficiently relevant to both researchers and co-participants to harness their passion and work together for a common good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Smith
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - John McLeod
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mick Cooper
- Department of Psychology, Roehampton University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lynne Gabriel
- School of Education, Language and Psychology, York St John University, York, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Kupfer
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Julia McLeod
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hanne Weie Oddli
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mhairi Thurston
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Anne Winter
- Manchester Institute of Education, Schools of Environment, Education, and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|