Comparison of efficacy between tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid for total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) have been demonstrated to reduce blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TXA and EACA in reducing blood loss in primary TKA patients.

METHODS

A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified all relevant studies published until December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting a comparison of TXA and EACA for TKA patients were selected. The main outcomes were total blood loss (TBL), hemoglobin (Hb) drop on postoperative day 3, intraoperative blood loss, operation time and the transfusion rate were evaluated. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 739 (TXA:372; EACA:367) patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss, Hb drop on postoperative day 3, operation time, tourniquet time (TT), transfusion rate and the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between the 2 treatments groups. However, compared with EACA, TXA significant reduced TBL (WMD, 174.60; 95% CI, -244.09 to -105.11).

CONCLUSION

Our research did not demonstrate TXA to be superior to EACA in reducing need for transfusion and Hb drop. TXA was superior than EACA in reducing TBL in TKA patients. More RCTs with identical inclusion criteria and dose and duration of treatment, are required to confirm these findings.

Safety of antifibrinolytics in 6583 pediatric patients having craniosynostosis surgery: A decade of data reported from the multicenter Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

Antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are effective at reducing blood loss and transfusion in pediatric patients having craniofacial surgery. The Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group has previously reported low rates of seizures and thromboembolic events (equal to no antifibrinolytic given) in open craniofacial surgery.

AIMS

To query the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group database to provide an updated antifibrinolytic safety profile in children given that antifibrinolytics have become recommended standard of care in this surgical population. Additionally, we include the population of younger infants having minimally invasive procedures.

METHODS

Patients in the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group registry between June 2012 and March 2021 having open craniofacial surgery (fronto-orbital advancement, mid and posterior vault, total cranial vault remodeling, intracranial LeFort III monobloc), endoscopic cranial suture release, and spring mediated cranioplasty were included. The primary outcome is the rate of postoperative complications possibly attributable to antifibrinolytic use (seizures, seizure-like activity, and thromboembolic events) in infants and children undergoing craniosynostosis surgery who did or did not receive antifibrinolytics.

RESULTS

Forty-five institutions reporting 6583 patients were included. The overall seizure rate was 0.24% (95% CI: 0.14, 0.39%), with 0.20% in the no Antifibrinolytic group and 0.26% in the combined Antifibrinolytic group, with no statistically reported difference. Comparing seizure rates between tranexamic acid (0.22%) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (0.44%), there was no statistically significant difference (odds ratio = 2.0; 95% CI: 0.6, 6.7; p = .257). Seizure rate was higher in patients greater than 6 months (0.30% vs. 0.18%; p = .327), patients undergoing open procedures (0.30% vs. 0.06%; p = .141), and syndromic patients (0.70% vs. 0.19%; p = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter international experience of pediatric craniofacial surgery reports no increase in seizures or thromboembolic events in those that received antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid) versus those that did not. This report provides further evidence of antifibrinolytic safety. We recommend following pharmacokinetic-based dosing guidelines for administration.

A New Insight on the Radioprotective Potential of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid

Background and objectives: The aim of the study was to scrutinize the ability of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) to prevent radiation-induced damage to human cells. Materials and Methods: Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were exposed to ionizing radiation at three low doses (22.62 mGy, 45.27 mGy, and 67.88 mGy) in the presence of EACA at the concentration of 50 ng/mL. Results: EACA was able to prevent cell death induced by low-dose X-ray radiation and suppress the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). EACA also demonstrated a capacity to protect DNA from radiation-induced damage. The data indicated that EACA is capable of suppression of radiation-induced apoptosis. Comparative tests of antioxidative activity of EACA and a range of free radical scavengers showed an ability of EACA to effectively inhibit the generation of ROS. Conclusions: This study showed that the pretreatment of PBMCs with EACA is able to protect the cells from radiation-elicited damage, including free radicals' formation, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

A randomized, double-blinded trial comparing the effectiveness of tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid in reducing bleeding and transfusion in cardiac surgery

Objectives:

To compare the effectiveness of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) to tranexamic acid (TA) in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergone cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Design:

Randomized, double blinded study. Outcome variables collected included; baseline demographic characteristics, type of surgery, amount of 24 hour chest tube drainage, amount of 24 hour blood products administered, 30 day mortality and morbidity and length of stay. We analyzed the data using parametric and non-parametric tests as appropriate.

Setting:

Single center tertiary-care university hospital setting.

Participants:

114 patients who had undergone cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Interventions:

Standard dose of intra-operative EACA or TA was compared in patients undergone cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Results:

There was no statistically significant difference between groups when analyzing chest tube drainage. However, there was a significant difference in the administration of any transfusion (PRBC's, FFP, platelets) intra-operatively to 24 hours postoperatively, with less transfusion in patients receiving EACA compared to TA (25% vs. 44.8%, respectively P = 0.027). Additionally, there was no significant difference in terms of adverse events during the one month follow up period.

Conclusion:

The findings of this study suggest that EACA and TA have similar effects on chest tube drainage but EACA is associated with fewer transfusions in CABG alone surgeries. Our results suggest that EACA can be used in a similar fashion to TA which may result in a cost and morbidity advantage.

Association of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid With Blood Loss and Risk of Transfusion After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) reorients the acetabular cartilage through a complex series of pelvic osteotomies, which risks significant blood loss often necessitating blood transfusion. Therefore, it is important to identify effective strategies to manage blood loss and decrease morbidity after PAO. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), an antifibrinolytic agent, with blood loss from PAO.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients out of 110 consecutive patients that underwent unilateral PAO for acetabular dysplasia met inclusion criteria. Fifty patients received EACA intraoperatively. Demographics, autologous blood predonation, anesthetic type, intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), cell-saver utilization, and transfusions were recorded. Total blood loss was calculated. Two-sample t-test and chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. The associations between EACA administration and calculated EBL, cell-saver utilization, intraoperative EBL, and maximum difference in postoperative hemoglobin were assessed via multiple regression, adjusting for confounders. Post hoc power analysis demonstrated sufficient power to detect a 250-mL difference in calculated EBL between groups. Alpha level was 0.05 for all tests.

RESULTS

No demographic differences existed between groups. Mean blood loss and allogeneic transfusion rates were not statistically significant between groups (P = .093 and .170, respectively). There were no differences in cell-saver utilization, intraoperative EBL, and/or postoperative hemoglobin. There was a higher rate of autologous blood utilization in the group not receiving EACA because of a clinical practice change.

CONCLUSIONS

EACA administration was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in blood loss or allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing PAO.