Optimization of the emergency endoscopy process for patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding using failure mode and effect analysis

OBJECTIVE

To optimize the emergency endoscopy process for patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) using failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA).

METHOD

In this retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who were hospitalized in Ganzhou People's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. They were divided into 51 cases before and 51 cases after the intervention according to the time of FMEA model intervention. The risk of unsafe transport, endoscopic hemostasis success rate, RPN (risk priority number) value, dual venous access time, resuscitation success rate, emergency endoscopy timeout execution rate, patient health education awareness rate, and endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices (EVL) procedure volume were compared accordingly before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

After the FMEA intervention, the emergency endoscopy process for EGVB patients was optimized, the risk of unsafe transport for emergency EGVB endoscopy was reduced, and the success rate of emergency endoscopic hemostasis for patients was improved. Also, the failure mode of RPN values greater than 12 was improved. After the countermeasures were implemented, the resuscitation success rate of EGVB patients reached 95%, the safe transport pass rate increased from 88% to 98.7%, and the patient health education awareness increased from 69% to 92%. The number of EGVB patients who underwent EVL surgery ranked second in the province. The waiting time, gastric function recovery time, dual venous access time, and hospital stay of patients who underwent the optimized procedure were significantly shorter compared to those before implementation (all P<0.01). The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in patients who underwent the optimized procedure compared to the pre-implementation period (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Applying FMEA to analyze and optimize the process of EGVB patients undergoing emergency endoscopy can maximize patient life safety and treatment safety, as well as improve medical quality and care safety.

Investigation report on endoscopic management of esophagogastric variceal bleeding by Chinese endoscopists

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a potentially life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Endoscopic treatment combined with pharmacotherapy remains the mainstay in the management of acute variceal bleeding.

AIM

This article intends to highlight the potential differences in the endoscopic management of EGVB in China.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Endoscopists from 85 hospitals in 62 cities from 26 provinces were contacted by email. The items in questionnaire involved academic experience, screening, esophagogastric varices (EGV) classification, emergency treatment, and primary and secondary prophylaxis of EGVB by endoscopists with different lengths of experience.

RESULTS

A total of 85 questionnaires were collected. There was no statistical difference in the selection of items (P < .05 indicated statistical significance). The majority of endoscopists (95.29%) offered EGV screening for patients with liver cirrhosis. The location, diameter, and risk factor classification was selected by 82.35% of endoscopists. Endoscopy + medication was preferred (42.35%) for the primary prophylaxis of moderate-to-severe EGVs. There was no statistical difference in emergency intervention time for active EGVB (P > .05). The response "patients receive emergency endoscopic intervention within 12 hours" was selected by 61.2% of the endoscopists. The preferred emergency treatment for EGVB was combination treatment (40%). Tissue adhesive embolization was selected for the treatment of gastric variceal bleeding by 74.12% of endoscopists; transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt/percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization were selected as remedial measures by 48.23% to 52.94% of endoscopists. In addition, 67.06% of endoscopists elected to perform secondary prophylaxis and treatment within 1 week after hemostasis. Endoscopy and endoscopy + medication were selected by 44.71% and 49.41% of endoscopists, respectively, for secondary prophylaxis. The choice of laboratory indicators did not differ with length of experience.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical difference in the endoscopic management of EGVB among Chinese endoscopists. The selection of diagnosis/treatment schemes was mainly based on guidelines and physician experience.

Combinations of liver lobe and spleen volumes obtained on magnetic resonance imaging to predict esophagogastric variceal bleeding in hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients: A prospective cohort study

To evaluate whether combinations of liver lobe and spleen volumes obtained on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) in hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients. Ninety-six consecutive patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis underwent upper abdominal contrast-enhanced MRI within 1 week after initial hospitalization, and grouped based on outcomes of EVB during the 2 years' follow-up after being discharged. Total liver volume (TLV), spleen volume (SV) and 4 liver lobe volumes including right lobe volume (RV), left medial lobe volume (LMV), left lateral lobe volume (LLV), and caudate lobe volume (CV) were measured on MRI. Percentages of individual liver lobe volumes in TLV (including RV/TLV, LMV/TLV, LLV/TLV, and CV/TLV), ratios of SV to individual liver lobe volumes (including SV/RV, SV/LMV, SV/LLV, and SV/CV), and SV/TLV were statistically analyzed to predict EVB. Patients with EVB had lower RV than without EVB (P value = .001), whereas no differences in LMV, LLV, CV, and TLV were found (P values >.05 for all). Among percentages of individual liver lobe volumes in TLV, RV/TLV was lower whereas LMV/TLV and LLV/TLV were greater in patients with EVB than without EVB (P values <.05 for all). SV, ratios of SV to individual liver lobe volumes, and SV/TLV in patients with EVB were larger than without EVB (P values <.05 for all). Among parameters with difference between patients with and without EVB, SV/RV could best predict EVB with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84. SV/RV could best predict EVB in hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients.

UPLC-MS/MS-Based Serum Metabolomics Signature as Biomarkers of Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Cirrhosis

Background: Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) is a common and ominous complication of cirrhosis and represents the degree of portal hypertension progression and cirrhosis decompensation, desiderating the investigation into sensitive and specific markers for early detection and prediction. The purpose of this study is to characterize unique metabolites in serum of cirrhotic EVB patients and identify potential noninvasive biomarkers for detecting and assessing risk of variceal bleeding and cirrhosis progression through metabolomics-based approaches and explore possible pathophysiological mechanisms.

Methods: We used ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) to profile serum metabolomes. In one discovery cohort (n = 26, 13 cases of EVB), univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to demonstrate separation between the two groups and identify differentially expressed metabolites. Potential biomarkers were screened by Boruta and logistic regression analyses, further evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis, and tested in two validation cohorts (n = 34, 17 cases and n = 10, 5 cases).

Results: Bioinformatics analyses demonstrated that EVB patients possessed distinct metabolic phenotypes compared with nEVB controls, characterized by seven elevated and six downregulated metabolites, indicating that EVB-related metabolic disturbance might be associated with vitamin metabolism and fatty acid metabolism. Eight potential biomarkers were selected among which citrulline and alpha-aminobutyric acid with moderate AUC values, tested in the validation cohorts, were identified as specific biomarkers of EVB.

Conclusion: Our metabolomic study provides an overview of serum metabolic profiles in EVB patients, highlighting the potential utility of UPLC-MS/MS-based serum fingerprint as a feasible avenue for early detection of EVB.

Efficacy and Safety of Ligation Combined With Sclerotherapy for Patients With Acute Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation + endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EVL+EIS) to control acute variceal bleeding (AVB). Methods: Online databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM) disc, VIP, and Wanfang, were searched to identify the studies comparing the differences between EVB+EIS and EVB, EIS from the inception of the databases up to December 30, 2020. STATA 13.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of eight studies involving 595 patients (317 patients in the EVL group and 278 patients in the EVL+EIS group) were included. The results of the meta-analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the efficacy of acute bleeding control (P = 0.981), overall rebleeding (P = 0.415), variceal eradication (P = 0.960), and overall mortality (P = 0.314), but a significant difference was noted in the overall complications (P = 0.01). Conclusion: EVL is superior to the combination of EVL and EIS in safety, while no statistically significant differences were detected in efficacy. Further studies should be designed with a large sample size, multiple centers, and randomized controlled trials to assess both clinical interventions.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices is a fatal event in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, the effects of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection on esophagogastric variceal bleeding are not known. The present study was aimed to elucidate the role of H. pylori infection in esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

METHODS

The subjects were 196 cirrhotic patients who were admitted to the Kurume University Hospital to treat their esophagogastric varices consisted of 95 with acute bleeding and 101 with nonbleeding but high risk of bleeding. For the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, a (13) C-urea breath test was used, and serum pepsinogen (PG) I and II levels and the PG I/II ratio were also measured.

RESULTS

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding was seen in 34.9% (n = 30) of the H. pylori-infected patients (n = 86) and in 59.1% (n = 65) of the noninfected patients (n = 110) (P < 0.0007). There was no significant difference in the infection rate between the bleeding sites of the esophagus and the stomach. The serum PG I and II levels and the PG I/II ratio were 65.6 ng/dL, 14.7 ng/dL, and 4.4, respectively, for the bleeding patients (n = 95), and 43.7 ng/dL, 17.7 ng/dL, and 3.1 for the nonbleeding patients (n = 101). Thus, the nonbleeding patients had significantly higher rate of H. pylori infection and lower acid secretion than bleeding patients (0.001). In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant negative association between H. pylori infection and esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that H. pylori infection has a protective effect against esophagogastric variceal bleeding through the induction of gastric mucosal atrophy and concomitant hypoacidity.