1
|
Vera P, Thureau S, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Modzelewski R, Bohn P, Vermandel M, Hapdey S, Pallardy A, Mahé MA, Lacombe M, Boisselier P, Guillemard S, Olivier P, Beckendorf V, Salem N, Charrier N, Chajon E, Devillers A, Aide N, Danhier S, Denis F, Muratet JP, Martin E, Riedinger AB, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Dansin E, Massabeau C, Courbon F, Farcy Jacquet MP, Kotzki PO, Houzard C, Mornex F, Vervueren L, Paumier A, Fernandez P, Salaun M, Dubray B. Phase II Study of a Radiotherapy Total Dose Increase in Hypoxic Lesions Identified by 18F-Misonidazole PET/CT in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (RTEP5 Study). J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1045-1053. [PMID: 28254869 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
See an invited perspective on this article on page 1043.This multicenter phase II study investigated a selective radiotherapy dose increase to tumor areas with significant 18F-misonidazole (18F-FMISO) uptake in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Methods: Eligible patients had locally advanced NSCLC and no contraindication to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The 18F-FMISO uptake on PET/CT was assessed by trained experts. If there was no uptake, 66 Gy were delivered. In 18F-FMISO-positive patients, the contours of the hypoxic area were transferred to the radiation oncologist. It was necessary for the radiotherapy dose to be as high as possible while fulfilling dose-limiting constraints for the spinal cord and lungs. The primary endpoint was tumor response (complete response plus partial response) at 3 mo. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival at 1 y. The target sample size was set to demonstrate a response rate of 40% or more (bilateral α = 0.05, power 1-β = 0.95). Results: Seventy-nine patients were preincluded, 54 were included, and 34 were 18F-FMISO-positive, 24 of whom received escalated doses of up to 86 Gy. The response rate at 3 mo was 31 of 54 (57%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-71%) using RECIST 1.1 (17/34 responders in the 18F-FMISO-positive group). DFS and overall survival at 1 y were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74), respectively. DFS was longer in the 18F-FMISO-negative patients (P = 0.004). The radiotherapy dose was not associated with DFS when adjusting for the 18F-FMISO status. One toxic death (66 Gy) and 1 case of grade 4 pneumonitis (>66 Gy) were reported. Conclusion: Our approach results in a response rate of 40% or more, with acceptable toxicity. 18F-FMISO uptake in NSCLC patients is strongly associated with poor prognosis features that could not be reversed by radiotherapy doses up to 86 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Vera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF-LITIS, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Sébastien Thureau
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF-LITIS, Rouen, France
| | - Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpitaux universitaires Paris Sud Bicêtre AP-HP and University Paris Sud, Paris, France
| | - Romain Modzelewski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF-LITIS, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Pierre Bohn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF-LITIS, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Maximilien Vermandel
- University Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1189-ONCO-THAI-Image Assisted Laser Therapy for Oncology, Lille, France
| | - Sébastien Hapdey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF-LITIS, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Amandine Pallardy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Marc-André Mahé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Marie Lacombe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes, France
| | - Pierre Boisselier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Guillemard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Olivier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Veronique Beckendorf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Naji Salem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - Nathalie Charrier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - Enrique Chajon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre regional de lutte contre le cancer de Bretagne Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Anne Devillers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre regional de lutte contre le cancer de Bretagne Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Nicolas Aide
- Nicolas Aide, Nuclear Medicine and TEP Centre, Caen University Hospital and Inserm U1086 ANTICIPE, Caen, France
| | - Serge Danhier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | - Fabrice Denis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Inter-Régional de Cancérologie (ILC), Centre Jean Bernard/Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Muratet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Inter-Régional de Cancérologie (ILC), Centre Jean Bernard/Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Eric Dansin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille cedex, France
| | - Carole Massabeau
- Département de Radiothérapie. Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - Fredéric Courbon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT, Toulouse cedex 9, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Farcy Jacquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Nîmes, Institut de cancérologie du Gard, Rue Henri Pujol, Nîmes, France
| | - Pierre-Olivier Kotzki
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Nîmes, Institut de cancérologie du Gard, Nîmes, France
| | - Claire Houzard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Francoise Mornex
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Amaury Paumier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, site Paul Papin, France
| | - Philippe Fernandez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, France; and
| | - Mathieu Salaun
- Normandy University, UNIROUEN, QuantIF-LITIS EA 4108, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Pulmonology-Thoracic Oncology-Respiratory Intensive Care, Rouen, France
| | - Bernard Dubray
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF-LITIS, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|