1
|
Meyerson BE, Bentele KG, Brady BR, Stavros N, Russell DM, Mahoney AN, Garnett I, Jackson S, Garcia RC, Coles HB, Granillo B, Carter GA. Insufficient Impact: Limited Implementation of Federal Regulatory Changes to Methadone and Buprenorphine Access in Arizona During COVID-19. AJPM Focus 2024; 3:100177. [PMID: 38312524 PMCID: PMC10835120 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Introduction This study examined the impact of federal regulatory changes on methadone and buprenorphine treatment during COVID-19 in Arizona. Methods A cohort study of methadone and buprenorphine providers from September 14, 2021 to April 15, 2022 measured the proportion of 6 treatment accommodations implemented at 3 time periods: before COVID-19, during Arizona's COVID-19 shutdown, and at the time of the survey completion. Accommodations included (1) telehealth, (2) telehealth buprenorphine induction, (3) increased multiday dosing, (4) license reciprocity, (5) home medications delivery, and (6) off-site dispensing. A multilevel model assessed the association of treatment setting, rurality, and treatment with accommodation implementation time. Results Over half (62.2%) of the 74-provider sample practiced in healthcare settings not primarily focused on addiction treatment, 19% practiced in methadone clinics, and 19% practiced in treatment clinics not offering methadone. Almost half (43%) were unaware of the regulatory changes allowing treatment accommodation. Telehealth was most frequently reported, increasing from 30% before COVID-19 to 80% at the time of the survey. Multiday dosing was the only accommodation substantially retracted after COVID-19 shutdown: from 41% to 23% at the time of the survey. Providers with higher patient limits were 2.5-3.2 times as likely to implement telehealth services, 4.4 times as likely to implement buprenorphine induction through telehealth, and 15.2-20.9 times as likely to implement license reciprocity as providers with lower patient limits. Providers of methadone implemented 12% more accommodations and maintained a higher average proportion of implemented accommodations during the COVID-19 shutdown period but were more likely to reduce the proportion of implemented accommodations (a 17-percentage point gap by the time of the survey). Conclusions Federal regulatory changes are not sufficient to produce a substantive or sustained impact on provider accommodations, especially in methadone medical treatment settings. Practice change interventions specific to treatment settings should be implemented and studied for their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, The University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Keith G Bentele
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Benjamin R Brady
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, The University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, Arizona
- School of Interdisciplinary Health Programs, College of Health and Human Services, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Nick Stavros
- Community Medical Services, Phoenix, Arizona
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Danielle M Russell
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, Tucson, Arizona
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arlene N Mahoney
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, Tucson, Arizona
- Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Irene Garnett
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | | | | | - Brenda Granillo
- Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Gregory A Carter
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Department of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
- Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|