The fitness costs and benefits of trisomy of each Candida albicans chromosome

Candida albicans is a prevalent human fungal pathogen. Rapid genomic change, due to aneuploidy, is a common mechanism that facilitates survival from multiple types of stresses including the few classes of available antifungal drugs. The stress survival of aneuploids occurs despite the fitness costs attributed to most aneuploids growing under idealized lab conditions. Systematic study of the aneuploid state in C. albicans has been hindered by the lack of a comprehensive collection of aneuploid strains. Here, we describe a collection of diploid C. albicans aneuploid strains, each carrying one extra copy of each chromosome, all from the same genetic background. We tested the fitness of this collection under several physiological conditions including shifts in pH, low glucose, oxidative stress, temperature, high osmolarity, membrane stress, and cell wall stress. We found that most aneuploids, under most conditions, were less fit than their euploid parent, yet there were specific conditions under which specific aneuploid isolates provided a fitness benefit relative to the euploid parent strain. Importantly, this fitness benefit was attributable to the change in the copy number of specific chromosomes. Thus, C. albicans can tolerate aneuploidy of each chromosome and some aneuploids confer improved growth under conditions that the yeast encounters in its host niches.

Experimental evidence that brighter males sire more extra-pair young in tree swallows

Across taxa, extra-pair mating is widespread among socially monogamous species, but few studies have identified male ornamental traits associated with extra-pair mating success, and even fewer studies have experimentally manipulated male traits to determine whether they are related directly to paternity. As a consequence, there is little experimental evidence to support the widespread hypothesis that females choose more ornamented males as extra-pair mates. Here, we conducted an experimental study of the relationship between male plumage colour and fertilization success in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), which have one of the highest levels of extra-pair mating in birds. In this study, we experimentally dulled the bright blue plumage on the back of males (with nontoxic ink markers) early in the breeding season prior to most mating. Compared with control males, dulled males sired fewer extra-pair young, and, as a result, fewer young overall. Among untreated males, brighter blue males also sired more extra-pair young, and in paired comparisons, extra-pair sires had brighter blue plumage than the within-pair male they cuckolded. These results, together with previous work on tree swallows, suggest that extra-pair mating behaviour is driven by benefits to both males and females.

Limited and fitness-neutral effects of resource heterogeneity on sociality in a communally rearing rodent

Contrasting scenarios have been proposed to explain how resource heterogeneity influences group living or sociality. First, sociality may result from individuals in larger groups attaining net fitness benefits by monopolizing access to resources ("resource-defense" hypothesis). Second, sociality may be the fitness-neutral outcome of multiple individuals using a territory with sufficient resources to sustain a group of conspecifics ("resource-dispersion" hypothesis). While previous studies have tended to support the resource-dispersion hypothesis, these analyses have typically examined only 1 or a few predictions, making it difficult to distinguish between the 2 alternatives. We conducted a 4-year field study of Octodon degus to quantify the effects of spatial heterogeneity in food and refuge distributions on group size and 2 components of reproductive success (per capita number of offspring, offspring survival) in this plural breeding and communal rearing rodent. We found only a small effect of heterogeneity of food resources on group size; the effect food resource distribution on group territory size varied across years. Group size did not vary with spatial variation in group territory size and quality. Importantly, there was no covariation between group size and quality of an individual's territory (i.e., a measure of individual access to resources), or between this measure of territory quality and reproductive success, implying no resource-based benefits to social degus. Overall, our results were more consistent with fitness-neutral relationships among spatial heterogeneity of resources, sociality, and territory size. The resource-dispersion hypothesis, however, did not provide a complete explanation for degu socioecology. Se han propuesto distintas hipótesis para explicar cómo la heterogeneidad de los recursos afecta la vida en grupos, o sociabilidad. Esta puede surgir en situaciones donde individuos en grupos grandes se benefician al monopolizar el acceso a recursos (hipótesis de defensa de recursos). Por otra parte, la vida en grupos también puede ser el resultado neutro (en términos de adecuación) de individuos que comparten un territorio con recursos suficientes (hipótesis de dispersión de recursos). Aunque algunos estudios previos han validado la hipótesis de dispersión de recursos, estos solo han evaluado un número limitado de las predicciones de esta hipótesis, lo que ha dificultado distinguir entre esta y otras hipótesis alternativas. Durante un estudio de 4 años cuantificamos los efectos de la heterogeneidad espacial de alimento y distribución de refugios sobre el tamaño de grupo y dos componentes del éxito reproductivo (número per cápita de crías, supervivencia de las crías) en Octodon degus. Se registraron efectos relativamente pequeños de la heterogeneidad espacial del alimento sobre el tamaño de grupo, y variables entre años sobre el tamaño del territorio de cada grupo. El tamaño de grupo no fue afectado por la variación espacial en el tamaño y calidad del territorio de los grupos. No se registró co-variación entre el tamaño de los grupos y la calidad del territorio de cada individuo (una medida individual del acceso a recursos), o entre la calidad del territorio individual y el éxito reproductivo, lo que sugiere ausencia de beneficios derivados del uso social de recursos en degus. En general, los resultados fueron más consistentes con un escenario de efectos neutros de la heterogeneidad espacial de recursos sobre la sociabilidad. Sin embargo, la hipótesis de dispersión de recursos no explicó el conjunto de efectos (o su ausencia) asociados a la socioecología del degu.

Bad guys turned nice? A critical assessment of Wolbachia mutualisms in arthropod hosts

Wolbachia are the most abundant bacterial endosymbionts among arthropods. Although maternally inherited, they do not conform to the widespread view that vertical transmission inevitably selects for beneficial symbionts. Instead, Wolbachia are notorious for their reproductive parasitism which, although lowering host fitness, ensures their spread. However, even for reproductive parasites it can pay to enhance host fitness. Indeed, there is a recent upsurge of reports on Wolbachia-associated fitness benefits. Therefore, the question arises how such instances of mutualism are related to the phenotypes of reproductive parasitism. Here, we review the evidence of Wolbachia mutualisms in arthropods, including both facultative and obligate relationships, and critically assess their biological relevance. Although many studies report anti-pathogenic effects of Wolbachia, few actually prove these effects to be relevant to field conditions. We further show that Wolbachia frequently have beneficial and detrimental effects at the same time, and that reproductive manipulations and obligate mutualisms may share common mechanisms. These findings undermine the idea of a clear-cut distinction between Wolbachia mutualism and parasitism. In general, both facultative and obligate mutualisms can have a strong, and sometimes unforeseen, impact on the ecology and evolution of Wolbachia and their arthropod hosts. Acknowledging this mutualistic potential might be the key to a better understanding of some unresolved issues in the study of Wolbachia-host interactions.