1
|
Scheirich L, Maguire T, Daffern M. Testing a recovery-oriented nursing communication framework to encourage collaboration and discussion about aggression prevention: A mixed methods study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024. [PMID: 38532536 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Recovery-oriented practice is essential in healthcare, yet research exploring methods for integrating recovery-oriented principles in forensic mental health settings is limited. This study involved the co-development, with mental health care nurses and a lived experience expert, and testing of a recovery-oriented script for forensic mental health nurses to use when communicating with consumers at high-risk of imminent aggression. The aim was to examine whether nurses perceived the script as more empathic when the script included specific references to empathy, compared to an equivalent script that did not include empathic statements, and to explore nurses' perspectives on whether the script could help prevent aggression. Nurses (n = 54) working in a secure forensic mental health hospital were randomly allocated to read a script containing statements representing nine recovery-oriented principles that also included empathic statements, or an equivalent script that did not include empathic statements. After reading the script, the participants completed a questionnaire involving a recovery-oriented practice scale developed by the authors, measuring the extent to which the scripts reflected recovery-oriented principles, and open-ended questions about the script's potential to prevent aggression. Results revealed no significant difference in nurse perceptions of empathy between the two scripts. Content analysis indicated that nurses perceived the scripts could help prevent aggression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Scheirich
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tessa Maguire
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Fairfield, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Daffern
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Fairfield, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hipp K, Kangasniemi M, Varpula J, Lantta T. Nurses' and patient' descriptions about forms of power in pro re nata medication participation in forensic psychiatric care: A qualitative secondary analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:73-84. [PMID: 37661371 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Despite there being an emphasis on patient participation in their own care, it has been a challenge in pro re nata (PRN, as the circumstance arises) medication in forensic psychiatric care. The power imbalance in treatment relationships can be a barrier to patient participation and should therefore be further explored. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore the aspect of power in the descriptions of patients and nurses interviewed in a Finnish forensic psychiatric hospital about patient participation in PRN. A qualitative secondary analysis was conducted through the semi-structured interviews of the patients (n = 34) and nurses (n = 19). The data were analysed with deductive content analysis. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines were used to ensure comprehensive reporting. The findings revealed that patients and health professionals may have conflicting goals in PRN and that they both use power to try to achieve them. Power in PRN was described in different forms, including authority, force, manipulation and persuasion. Based on our results, the power that health professionals have in PRN medication is particularly based on their legitimate authority and the hierarchical structures of the hospital environment. Patients also hold power in the dynamics of PRN medication care, but their position as a power holder can vary individually and situationally. Recognizing different forms of power and supporting patients with a decreased capacity for decision-making is essential for promoting high-quality and patient-centred forensic psychiatric nursing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsi Hipp
- School of Health and Social Services, Häme University of Applied Sciences, Hämeenlinna, Finland
| | - Mari Kangasniemi
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Satakunta Hospital District, Turku, Finland
| | - Jaakko Varpula
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Satakunta Hospital District, Turku, Finland
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Satakunta Hospital District, Turku, Finland
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maguire T, Ryan J, Levett-Jones T, Olasoji M, Garvey L. Modifying the clinical reasoning cycle to enhance forensic mental health nursing utility. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023. [PMID: 38012100 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Forensic mental health nursing is a specialty area of practice requiring specific knowledge and skills to work collaboratively with consumers. The Clinical Reasoning Cycle has been recognised as a potential framework to support nursing practice; however, it has been identified that adaptations are required to enhance utility in a forensic mental health services. The aim of this study was to explore and finalise a version of the cycle for forensic mental health nursing practice. Focus groups and interviews were used to explore adaptations with staff from a state-wide forensic service and forensic mental health nursing academics. Data were thematically analysed. Four main themes were interpreted: (1) allegiance to the Nursing Process, (2) moving the cycle from page to practice, (3) working as a team, or not, and (4) implementation will be a marathon and not a sprint. While nursing academics were more in favour of updating the Nursing Process to ensure contemporary practice is captured, staff from the service were supportive of the adapted cycle but emphasised the need to ensure collaboration with the consumer and their supporters. The adapted cycle was seen to articulate the contribution of forensic mental health nursing care, and support for a nursing-specific cycle was embraced by other disciplines, despite some hesitation from nurses. Prior to implementation there is a need to ensure the merits of the cycle are clearly articulated, along with a range of resources and specific contextual information to ensure the cycle can be successfully applied to enhance nursing practice and consumer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Maguire
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, Victoria, Australia
- Forensicare (Victorian institute of Forensic Mental Health), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Federation University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jo Ryan
- Forensicare (Victorian institute of Forensic Mental Health), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Loretta Garvey
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, Victoria, Australia
- Federation University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moyles J, Hunter A, Grealish A. Forensic mental health nurses' experiences of rebuilding the therapeutic relationship after an episode of physical restraint in forensic services in Ireland: A qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:1377-1389. [PMID: 37243405 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have explored how forensic mental health nurses can rebuild the therapeutic relationship following an episode of physical restraint in the acute forensic setting. In this study, we aimed to redress this gap in the literature by exploring with forensic mental health nurses the factors that enable or hinder the rebuilding of the therapeutic relationship following an episode of physical restraint. A qualitative study design was used to capture participants' experiences, views and perceptions of the therapeutic relationship following an episode of physical restraint in the acute forensic setting. Data were collected through individual interviews with forensic mental health nurses (n = 10) working in an acute forensic setting. Interviews were audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim and accounts were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: 'Building a Recovery Focused Therapeutic Relationship'; 'Authoritarian Role'; 'Inevitable Imbalance'; 'Rebuilding the Therapeutic Relationship'; plus two sub-themes 'Facilitators to rebuilding' and 'Barriers to rebuilding'. Findings suggest that an inevitable imbalance exists in building a recovery-focused therapeutic relationship and at times, is hindered by the authoritarian role of the forensic mental health nurse. Recommendations for changes in clinical practice and in upcoming policies should incorporate a dedicated debrief room and protected time for staff to debrief effectively following restraint. Routine post-restraint-focused clinical supervision would also be beneficial to mental health nursing staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Moyles
- Department of Nursing, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew Hunter
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Annmarie Grealish
- Department of Nursing, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maguire T, Garvey L, Ryan J, Olasoji M, Willets G. Using the Nominal Group Technique to determine a nursing framework for a forensic mental health service: A discussion paper. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2022; 31:1030-1038. [PMID: 35591773 PMCID: PMC9321579 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The Nominal Group Technique is a method used to explore issues, generate ideas, and reach consensus on a topic. The Nominal Group Technique includes individual and group work and is designed to ensure participants have the same opportunity to engage and provide their opinions. While the technique has been used for around six decades to assist groups, in industry, and government organizations to examine issues and make decisions, this technique has received limited attention in nursing research, particularly in mental health. This discussion paper describes the use of a modified Nominal Group Technique for a study designed to determine a nursing decision-making framework for a state-wide forensic mental health service. Modifications were made to the traditional technique, to enable participants to make an informed and collective decision about a suitable framework for the novice to expert nurses, across secure inpatient, prison, and community forensic mental health settings. The Nominal Group Technique generated rich data and offered a structured approach to the process. We argue that the Nominal Group Technique offers an exciting and interactive method for nursing research and can increase opportunity for minority group members to participate. This technique also offers a time efficient way to engage busy clinical nurses to participate in research, with the advantage of members knowing the decision on the day of the group. Consideration, however, needs to be given to the duration and effect on participant concentration, and if not actively managed by facilitators, the possible emergence of group dynamics affecting individuals' decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Maguire
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.,The Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Loretta Garvey
- Department of Nursing & Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jo Ryan
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.,The Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Olasoji
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Georgina Willets
- School of Health, Federation University Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the personal, professional and workplace factors that influence evidence-based practice for forensic mental health nurses. Aim: This study describes the sources of practice knowledge for forensic mental health nurses, and the factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. Design: This research study utilised a cross sectional survey design. Methods: All nurses (n = 244) working in one forensic mental health in-patient facility were sent an electronic invitation to complete the Developing Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire. Data was analysed to calculate descriptive statistics. Findings: Fifty-three respondents completed the survey. Respondents reported using experiential knowledge and locally derived sources of information more frequently than research-based evidence to inform their practice. Respondents reported being least skilled at finding, reviewing and using research evidence to change practice. The most frequently rated barriers to evidence-based practice were having insufficient time and resources to both finding and reviewing information and to implement changes in practice. Conclusions: Forensic mental health nurses tend to express a bias towards valuing social or qualitative sources of information to inform practice. Exploring the relationships between individual and organisational factors in the context of forensic mental health is recommended in order to gain further insights into the translation of evidence into practice for forensic mental health nurses. Impact statement: Unique contextual aspects of the forensic mental health environment may influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. Our study highlights that further support, resources and training is required to promote the use of research-based evidence in forensic mental health nursing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Newman
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, PO Box 150, Matraville, NSW 2210, Australia
| | - Karen Patterson
- Clinical Excellence Commission, NSW Health McKell Building, 2-24 Rawson Pl, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
| | - Michelle Eason
- Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, PO Box 150, Matraville, NSW 2210, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barr L, Wynaden D, Heslop K. Promoting positive and safe care in forensic mental health inpatient settings: Evaluating critical factors that assist nurses to reduce the use of restrictive practices. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:888-898. [PMID: 30916443 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Reducing and eliminating the use of restrictive practices, such as seclusion and restraint, is a national priority for Australia's mental health services. Whilst legislation, organization and practice changes have all contributed to a reduction in these practices, forensic mental health services continue to report high rates. This paper details the findings of research that examined the experiences of nurses working in the inpatient forensic mental health setting. The research aimed to (i) document the experiences of nurses working in the forensic mental health setting, (ii) articulate their perceived unique skill set to manage challenging patient behaviours, and (iii) determine how their experiences and skill set can inform practice changes to reduce the use of restrictive practices. Thirty-two nurses were recruited from one Australian forensic mental health service. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed using inductive content analysis. Four categories were identified that influenced practice experiences: (i) working in a challenging but interesting environment, (ii) specialty expertize, (iii) exposure to aggression and resilience as a protective factor, and (iv) the importance of effective teamwork and leadership. Forensic mental health care is complex, highly specialized, and often delivered in an unpredictable environment. Whilst high rates of restrictive practices may be linked to the unique characteristics of forensic patients, training, teamwork, and leadership are critical factors influencing their use in this setting. Nurses working in this area need to be educated and supported to work confidently and safely with this high-risk patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Barr
- State Forensic Mental Health Service, Western Australia, (NMHS-MH), Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dianne Wynaden
- Curtin University (Nursing & Midwifery), Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Heslop
- Curtin University (Nursing & Midwifery), Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|